Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Biden vs Trump
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
Seems like Biden has done a better job than Trump if you compare their first four years as President.

Even if half speed, he was better than the alternative of Trump.

Trump has no leadership capabilities. He has no solid policies and he operates like an unmedicated ADHD child simply running around acting on impulse and not putting thought into what he’s doing.

And his merry band of cultist follow him around clapping like trained seals. It's hilarious how easy and how bad he humiliates his cult members and the poor guys just take it all in.
Oh DOOF, your trolling knows such miniscule boundaries. Stale, tired...perhaps it's time for you to retire to Bluesky where they'll appreciate your "insights" and "intellect."
(12-21-2024, 09:30 AM)TDOSS Wrote: [ -> ]Seems like Biden has done a better job than Trump if you compare their first four years as President.

Even if half speed, he was better than the alternative of Trump.

Trump has no leadership capabilities. He has no solid policies and he operates like an unmedicated ADHD child simply running around acting on impulse and not putting thought into what he’s doing.

And his merry band of cultist follow him around clapping like trained seals. It's hilarious how easy and how bad he humiliates his cult members and the poor guys just take it all in.

Stay away from the kids, Pedo Pete.. Go back to BlueSky with the rest of your ilk. Just do it, Pete..

It's like that coat hanger hooked your brain..
No response but name calling.
(12-21-2024, 10:39 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]No response but name calling.

The response appear to be based on the quality of the initial post. Just my opinion. Actually when I read the title I was hoping they had agreed to do a pay per view MMA event on Prime.
(12-21-2024, 11:02 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-21-2024, 10:39 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]No response but name calling.

The response appear to be based on the quality of the initial post. Just my opinion. Actually when I read the title I was hoping they had agreed to do a pay per view MMA event on Prime.

Once again blaming others for your behavior. 
If the post is bad you can ignore it, or you can explain why it's bad, it is not an excuse for name calling.
(12-21-2024, 11:31 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-21-2024, 11:02 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]The response appear to be based on the quality of the initial post. Just my opinion. Actually when I read the title I was hoping they had agreed to do a pay per view MMA event on Prime.

Once again blaming others for your behavior. 
If the post is bad you can ignore it, or you can explain why it's bad, it is not an excuse for name calling.
Have a nice day...Wink
(12-21-2024, 11:31 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-21-2024, 11:02 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]The response appear to be based on the quality of the initial post. Just my opinion. Actually when I read the title I was hoping they had agreed to do a pay per view MMA event on Prime.

Once again blaming others for your behavior. 
If the post is bad you can ignore it, or you can explain why it's bad, it is not an excuse for name calling.

149 didn't say anything, why are you blaming him for your perceived injustice?
(12-21-2024, 10:39 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]No response but name calling.

Respond to what?  There's nothing of substance in the original post.  It was just more of his Trump-bashing troll-speak, without a single reference to either's specific accomplishments or failures.
(12-22-2024, 01:15 PM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-21-2024, 10:39 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]No response but name calling.

Respond to what?  There's nothing of substance in the original post.  It was just more of his Trump-bashing troll-speak, without a single reference to either's specific accomplishments or failures.

Mike is the MSM of the message board.
(12-22-2024, 01:15 PM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-21-2024, 10:39 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]No response but name calling.

Respond to what?  There's nothing of substance in the original post.  It was just more of his Trump-bashing troll-speak, without a single reference to either's specific accomplishments or failures.

Lol.
There were plenty of falsifiable statements.  Plenty of claims of fact.  But not much evidence or specifics, true.
So here are some constructive replies you could make,
"Do you have any evidence?"
"Cultists? All of them? Aren't you painting with a broad brush there, guy?"
"What specifically was better with Biden's term than Trump's? Certainly not inflation!"

Instead we got 
"You're a pedophile." And there's no evidence that he is. Who actually lacks substance here?
(12-22-2024, 02:22 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-22-2024, 01:15 PM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]Respond to what?  There's nothing of substance in the original post.  It was just more of his Trump-bashing troll-speak, without a single reference to either's specific accomplishments or failures.

Lol.
There were plenty of falsifiable statements.  Plenty of claims of fact.  But not much evidence or specifics, true.
So here are some constructive replies you could make,
"Do you have any evidence?"
"Cultists? All of them? Aren't you painting with a broad brush there, guy?"
"What specifically was better with Biden's term than Trump's? Certainly not inflation!"

Instead we got 
"You're a pedophile." And there's no evidence that he is.  Who actually lacks substance here?

I never said that, in fact I have never used those words. You posted a complete falsehood. As far how we reply to posts you are not in a position to council us, your as flawed or possibly more flawed than most of us.  Please do not put words in my mouth in the future. I copied my post and your reply below.

mikesez Wrote: Wrote:
(Yesterday, 11:02 AM)Jag149 Wrote: Wrote:The response appear to be based on the quality of the initial post. Just my opinion. Actually when I read the title I was hoping they had agreed to do a pay per view MMA event on Prime.

Once again blaming others for your behavior. 
If the post is bad you can ignore it, or you can explain why it's bad, it is not an excuse for name calling.
(12-22-2024, 01:19 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-22-2024, 01:15 PM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]Respond to what?  There's nothing of substance in the original post.  It was just more of his Trump-bashing troll-speak, without a single reference to either's specific accomplishments or failures.

Mike is the MSM of the message board.

Their credibility is far superior to his.
(12-22-2024, 02:34 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-22-2024, 02:22 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Lol.
There were plenty of falsifiable statements.  Plenty of claims of fact.  But not much evidence or specifics, true.
So here are some constructive replies you could make,
"Do you have any evidence?"
"Cultists? All of them? Aren't you painting with a broad brush there, guy?"
"What specifically was better with Biden's term than Trump's? Certainly not inflation!"

Instead we got 
"You're a pedophile." And there's no evidence that he is.  Who actually lacks substance here?

I never said that, in fact I have never used those words. You posted a complete falsehood. As far how we reply to posts you are not in a position to council us, your as flawed or possibly more flawed than most of us.  Please do not put words in my mouth in the future. I copied my post and your reply below.

mikesez Wrote: Wrote:Once again blaming others for your behavior. 
If the post is bad you can ignore it, or you can explain why it's bad, it is not an excuse for name calling.

Buddy, I know you didn't call him a pedo.  Winger did. Repeatedly.  And you basically said TDoss deserves it.  "It's based on the quality of the post.". Some posters deserve to be called pedophiles.  You don't call him a pedo, but you say he deserves it.
I will gladly make decent replies to all of you if you will just trust me and others the same.  If you won't, I won't.  Now this can be a bit of a catch-22 but that's where mods are supposed to come in.
(12-22-2024, 06:10 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-22-2024, 02:34 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]I never said that, in fact I have never used those words. You posted a complete falsehood. As far how we reply to posts you are not in a position to council us, your as flawed or possibly more flawed than most of us.  Please do not put words in my mouth in the future. I copied my post and your reply below.

Buddy, I know you didn't call him a pedo.  Winger did. Repeatedly.  And you basically said TDoss deserves it.  "It's based on the quality of the post.". Some posters deserve to be called pedophiles.  You don't call him a pedo, but you say he deserves it.
I will gladly make decent replies to all of you if you will just trust me and others the same.  If you won't, I won't.  Now this can be a bit of a catch-22 but that's where mods are supposed to come in.

Bro, Once again, please do not put words in my mouth. I let your first post go out of respect. When you doubled down with the pedo comment I needed to respond or let it stand. Silly thing is all you had to say was "yea my bad, made a mistake". Obviously from reading the post above you are incapable of that.

Trust me? Trust is earned and you just lost some from me.  Also, I do not believe you are in charge of the mod job description so I'll just ignore that as that is above my pay grade here.
(12-22-2024, 06:10 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-22-2024, 02:34 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]I never said that, in fact I have never used those words. You posted a complete falsehood. As far how we reply to posts you are not in a position to council us, your as flawed or possibly more flawed than most of us.  Please do not put words in my mouth in the future. I copied my post and your reply below.

Buddy, I know you didn't call him a pedo.  Winger did. Repeatedly.  And you basically said TDoss deserves it.  "It's based on the quality of the post.". Some posters deserve to be called pedophiles.  You don't call him a pedo, but you say he deserves it.
I will gladly make decent replies to all of you if you will just trust me and others the same.  If you won't, I won't.  Now this can be a bit of a catch-22 but that's where mods are supposed to come in.

You [BLEEP] right I did.. What other reason would a grown [BLEEP] man go into the girls bathroom? Give me another reason..

That's pedo behavior..

And if you support that, you're no better than one yourself..
(12-22-2024, 06:31 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-22-2024, 06:10 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Buddy, I know you didn't call him a pedo.  Winger did. Repeatedly.  And you basically said TDoss deserves it.  "It's based on the quality of the post.". Some posters deserve to be called pedophiles.  You don't call him a pedo, but you say he deserves it.
I will gladly make decent replies to all of you if you will just trust me and others the same.  If you won't, I won't.  Now this can be a bit of a catch-22 but that's where mods are supposed to come in.

Bro, Once again, please do not put words in my mouth. I let your first post go out of respect. When you doubled down with the pedo comment I needed to respond or let it stand. Silly thing is all you had to say was "yea my bad, made a mistake". Obviously from reading the post above you are incapable of that.

Trust me? Trust is earned and you just lost some from me.  Also, I do not believe you are in charge of the mod job description so I'll just ignore that as that is above my pay grade here.

Please read the thread again, from the beginning.  TDoss starts it, Winger calls him a pedo, I say name calling is bad, you say it's based on the quality of the post.
The truth stings sometimes..
(12-22-2024, 07:51 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-22-2024, 06:31 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]Bro, Once again, please do not put words in my mouth. I let your first post go out of respect. When you doubled down with the pedo comment I needed to respond or let it stand. Silly thing is all you had to say was "yea my bad, made a mistake". Obviously from reading the post above you are incapable of that.

Trust me? Trust is earned and you just lost some from me.  Also, I do not believe you are in charge of the mod job description so I'll just ignore that as that is above my pay grade here.

Please read the thread again, from the beginning.  TDoss starts it, Winger calls him a pedo, I say name calling is bad, you say it's based on the quality of the post.

Have a nice day...Wink
(12-22-2024, 08:46 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-22-2024, 07:51 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Please read the thread again, from the beginning.  TDoss starts it, Winger calls him a pedo, I say name calling is bad, you say it's based on the quality of the post.

Have a nice day...Wink
Translation: you got me so I am going to dismiss myself.
Pages: 1 2