90 % that OJ Howard is available at # 12.
If Carolina moves up to take Solomon there is a 75 % chance Fournette drops to # 21.
80% chance Forrest Lamp drops to # 26.
Quote:90 % that OJ Howard is available at # 12.
If Carolina moves up to take Solomon there is a 75 % chance Fournette drops to # 21.
80% chance Forrest Lamp drops to # 26.
On your three...
- I as well have Howard mocked to the Browns at #12, although I can see the Titans taking him at #5, the Jaguars taking him at #8 after a trade with the Panthers, or the Bills taking him at 10. ... agreed though.... those three situations pretty much make up that remaining 10 percent. I'd agree there's a 90 percent chance he's there at #12, and then unless the Browns go QB, they're taking OJ at #12.
- Carolina is going all out for Fournette. They'll get him one way or another.
- I'm now convinced the Dolphins take Lamp at #22, although I agree if they pass he could easily drop to 26... maybe even 29. He won't get past the Packers.
Quote:
On your three...
- I as well have Howard mocked to the Browns at #12, although I can see the Titans taking him at #5, the Jaguars taking him at #8 after a trade with the Panthers, or the Bills taking him at 10. ... agreed though.... those three situations pretty much make up that remaining 10 percent. I'd agree there's a 90 percent chance he's there at #12, and then unless the Browns go QB, they're taking OJ at #12.
- Carolina is going all out for Fournette. They'll get him one way or another.
- I'm now convinced the Dolphins take Lamp at #22, although I agree if they pass he could easily drop to 26... maybe even 29. He won't get past the Packers.
Why do you see Lamp to the Fish?
They have invested heavily in their OL the past few years.
Regarding Howard, I'm starting to change my mind a bit. That is, I'm noticing increased talk regarding OJ going to the Bengals at #9
I had them taking Derek Barnett who they brought in for a private interview, but I now think Barnett might fall possibly even several spots.
If Thomas, Garret, and Allen are gone, we take Barnett at 4. Is that a stretch?
Great statistical analysis, did you consult a firm or did you do the math yourself?
Quote:If Thomas, Garret, and Allen are gone, we take Barnett at 4. Is that a stretch?
I'd even take out Allen...
If Thomas/Garrett are gone I can see the pick being Barnett
Quote:I'd even take out Allen...
If Thomas/Garrett are gone I can see the pick being Barnett
Agreed.