Quote:Exactly. He's on record saying they have another release coming about this topic. That's why I dont get why people think they have some kind of argument here to defend Hillary.
They're just doing what they've been conditioned to do through a lifetime of indoctrination. It's nothing more than a dog whistle any time they see something potentially negative being reported about their pantsuit princess.
Quote:It's difficult to lie about something when you're dumping info out there in the words of the people standing accused. I have yet to see anyone question the validity of any information Wikileaks has released.
I'm not disagreeing with anything allegedly leaked, but at some point these things need to be be validated. Otherwise the rumor mill can say anything uncontested and it will be believed. Russia's got its hands all over this too. Information is just as valuable as misinformation if the source is not verified.
Quote:I'm not disagreeing with anything allegedly leaked, but at some point these things need to be be validated. Otherwise the rumor mill can say anything uncontested and it will be believed. Russia's got its hands all over this too. Information is just as valuable as misinformation if the source is not verified.
Assange has like 10 years flawless record
Quote:Assange has like 10 years flawless record
So if he leaks something that's not true tomorrow and nobody verifies it how would anyone know it's not true? That's my only point.
Quote:So if he leaks something that's not true tomorrow and nobody verifies it how would anyone know it's not true? That's my only point.
Do you honestly believe that anything that gets leaked wouldn't be verified by someone? Seriously? The media, your media, would desperately do everything in their power to discredit the emails. The fact that they have yet to discredit a single document that's been released by Assange speaks volumes, and underscores why the Clinton campaign is extremely nervous and concerned about the upcoming document dump.
Quote:I'm not disagreeing with anything allegedly leaked, but at some point these things need to be be validated. Otherwise the rumor mill can say anything uncontested and it will be believed. Russia's got its hands all over this too. Information is just as valuable as misinformation if the source is not verified.
They've been validated, either by the media digging into them, or by the deafening silence you hear from those who are attached to the emails.
The connection with Russia and Wikileaks does not exist. That's a fabrication from the Hillary camp created after the DNC email leak. Maybe you should apply more scrutiny to the KNOWN liars and not Assange. The guy who has yet to mislead us.
Quote:The connection with Russia and Wikileaks does not exist. That's a fabrication from the Hillary camp created after the DNC email leak. Maybe you should apply more scrutiny to the KNOWN liars and not Assange. The guy who has yet to mislead us.
I have been hearing wikileaks is a front for Russian Intelligence long before this election. They take money from RT which is funded by the Kremlin.
Quote:They've been validated, either by the media digging into them, or by the deafening silence you hear from those who are attached to the emails.
Wikileaks has been caught in lies before. But the damage is done when people blindly believe everything from this source.
Quote:I have been hearing wikileaks is a front for Russian Intelligence long before this election.
Well then, if you've been hearing it then damn, it must be true.
Quote:Wikileaks has been caught in lies before. But the damage is done when people blindly believe everything from this source.
Please provide link to proof of these lies you type about.
Quote:Well then, if you've been hearing it then damn, it must be true.
Believe me.
Quote:Wikileaks has been caught in lies before. But the damage is done when people blindly believe everything from this source.
What lies have they been caught in?
Assange is the liar, not the DNC. complete inversion of reality.
Quote:Assange is the liar, not the DNC. complete inversion of reality.
Yet another example of progressives blaming the messenger any time their pantsuit princess is caught in a sticky situation. Better to trash the messenger than to face the message.
For the record again.. I am not disputing anything they have said about anyone or anything. Just that there is danger in just believing everything from a source without any verification.
Quote:Yet another example of progressives blaming the messenger any time their pantsuit princess is caught in a sticky situation. Better to trash the messenger than to face the message.
You don't read much do you?
Quote:http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenber...7890293c2c
This is your great indictment? Bringing the weak sauce in an attempt to discredit WikiLeaks.
Bottom line: they're releasing EMAILS that were sent/received by the pantsuit princess. They're not trolling anyone here despite your most desperate wishful thinking.