http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016...-puzzling/
This is about as ordinary as it gets. Nothing to see here but an ordinary old couple, but I'm seeing quite a bit of hate directed towards it... as if 200k is suddenly "millionaire" land. Very strange.
lol meanwhile Billary are probably in legit "billionaire" territory if you look at just their 2014 return.
4% to charity while lecturing the country? Lol.
Quote:4% to charity while lecturing the country? Lol.
Its always "do as I say" with libbies.
Quote:Who's directing hate?
News networks and people that watch them
Quote:4% to charity while lecturing the country? Lol.
8,000$ for a 200k earner is pretty standard
Quote:Its always "do as I say" with libbies.
How come we haven't seen returns from your boy The Donald? You and jj82284 and DewIT and badger would probably have to do 30 posts listing excuses.
It always "don't let them see the truth" with yahoos.
Quote:How come we haven't seen returns from your boy The Donald? You and jj82284 and DewIT and badger would probably have to do 30 posts listing excuses.
It always "don't let them see the truth" with yahoos.
Vote fa Boinie, get a free Lambahghini!
Quote:8,000$ for a 200k earner is pretty standard
I expect a little above average for someone advocating compulsory income redistribution
Quote:How come we haven't seen returns from your boy The Donald? You and jj82284 and DewIT and badger would probably have to do 30 posts listing excuses.
It always "don't let them see the truth" with yahoos.
I'm not a Trump supporter.
Quote:I expect a little above average for someone advocating compulsory income redistribution
I expect a candidate running as a Washington and political outsider to never resort to campaign rhetoric, but Trumpettes accept that from their boy every day.
Quote:I expect a candidate running as a Washington and political outsider to never resort to campaign rhetoric, but Trumpettes accept that from their boy every day.
<a class="bbc_url" href='https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uYYKDaUpuTM'>https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uYYKDaUpuTM</a>
Quote:I expect a candidate running as a Washington and political outsider to never resort to campaign rhetoric, but Trumpettes accept that from their boy every day.
You and I don't always agree, but we do on this point.
Quote:<a class="bbc_url" href='https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uYYKDaUpuTM'>https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uYYKDaUpuTM</a>
Thank you for the example of what is playing in your head when Trump talks, because something is obviously distracting you from what he's really saying.
Pot.... Kettle.... Ah nevermind
Quote:4% to charity while lecturing the country? Lol.
Wait, he's been lecturing the country to pay more in charitable contributions?
Yet another classic miss-truth by my man, jj.
You're really on point this month.
Quote:Wait, he's been lecturing the country to pay more in charitable contributions?
Yet another classic miss-truth by my man, jj.
You're really on point this month.
Pretty much. Only it's veiled in the "pay their fair share" rhetoric. You know... for free college and stuff.
Quote:Pretty much. Only it's veiled in the "pay their fair share" rhetoric. You know... for free college and stuff.
Not pretty much. Not even close. Charitable contributions and taxes for the public good are two different things.
To compare them is either dishonesty to support a rhetorical talking point, or stupidity based on being duped by politicians lying to you about a political talking point.
Whether you believe in taxes for the public good or not, don't lie about what they are or are not.
Charitable contributions are not taxes. Yet another fact I've had to point out here..