We have developed and had good linebackers in recent and franchise history. DE not so much.
Although the need is greater in the modern day nfl for a pass rusher, Jack is the pick to help right the ship on d.
My worries about Jack is frankly that the biggest attributes constantly mentioned are versatility, athleticism, and instinct. Those are all great attributes to have, but those are also common attributes that I worry could be overrating him solely on his potential. Even if he were to translate those to the NFL, would he really be able to do so as a rookie? Everyone here keeps talking about how he will immediately step in as a great coverage LB, but don't most defensive players, even CB's, take time to figure out NFL coverages and preparation? Then on top of that, you cannot expect him to be all that versatile his first year.
True, if you think he will be great in 2-3 years, you have to take that chance but I don't really feel he showed that many flashes on defense at UCLA. On top of that, he has to recover from this first major injury, and that can be mental challenge for many players.
I get that Bosa is not the sexy pick. I know that most of the people are using the statement that you also take "great player over the good player." But a DE who gets 8-10 sacks a year for the next 5-7 years is highly sought after in NFL, and not something the Jag's franchise has ever really had.
The team needs to win now so you go with the best edge pass rusher in the draft with Joey Bosa, while Myles Jack has a lot of potential and upside he is a project (has to gain weight, get healthy, etc)
the GM & HC dont have the ability to risk the 5th overall pick on a guy that might not be great until next year.. same reason no LT Tunsil at 5.
I would say Ramsey & Vernon Hargreavess III are high potential at 5 or Joey Bosa or Buckner.. just depends on if they want the pass rusher or CB.