Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Quote:Nobody is "trying to manufacture untruths", just pointing out the obvious.

  

Quote:The obvious being, you were wrong assuming I was "acting like it doesn't exist?"

Get a room!

Yeah the Right is so outraged by this image.

<a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.infowarsstore.com/cnn-terrorist-t-shirt.html'>https://www.infowarsstore.com/cnn-terrorist-t-shirt.html</a>


They decided to profit from it!



Better yet Kathy is guilty of Plagiarism. She didn't even come up with this bit. Beefcake the Mighty did.

Quote:Yeah the Right is so outraged by this image.
<a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.infowarsstore.com/cnn-terrorist-t-shirt.html'>https://www.infowarsstore.com/cnn-terrorist-t-shirt.html</a>

They decided to profit from it!

There goes $ 15 out of Dingers piggy bank.

Quote:Link? (I mean one quoting Ted, not one from Salon.com claiming that Ted said that)

  

Quote:Ted Nugent says hi<a class="bbc_url" href='https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tNLmi0_216g'>https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tNLmi0_216g</a>

But sure, I'm sure the " I never heard that until now ostriches" will claim just that.

Either they just started to pay attention to politics, have weak or selective memories or lie.


My point made.

She looks like a damn crack whore in her fake insincere apology video. That's one skinny, ugly, skank.

Now Griffin is holding a presser to say how she was bullied by the Trump family.

 

Couldn't make this stuff up if I tried.

Quote:Ted Nugent says hi


<a class="bbc_url" href='https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tNLmi0_216g'>https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tNLmi0_216g</a>

 

Thanks for the link that Ringo wouldn't provide.


 

I agree, Ted Nugent was every bit as disgusting as Kathy Griffin. I still defend their right to free speech, no matter how offensive, but also the right of their employers and customers to blackball them for it.

Quote:Thanks for the link that Ringo wouldn't provide.


I agree, Ted Nugent was every bit as disgusting as Kathy Griffin. I still defend their right to free speech, no matter how offensive, but also the right of their employers and customers to blackball them for it.

And for Alex Jones to make $$$ from it while pretending to be offended?

Quote:There goes $ 15 out of Dingers piggy bank.

Nice to see I'm alive and well, right between your ears.. Gotta say though, you gotta fix that vacancy sign.. This place is deserted.

Quote:Nice to see I'm alive and well, right between your ears.. Gotta say though, you gotta fix that vacancy sign.. This place is deserted.

It was meant for Dinger Winger. Don't get the chest too puffed up.

Quote:Ted Nugent says hi


<a class="bbc_url" href='https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tNLmi0_216g'>https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tNLmi0_216g</a>

 

You seem ridiculously confused on this topic, so allow me to outline the disconnect.

 

Tell me this.

 

If this was the "same," then why didn't this get the play that Kathy Griffin did?

 

Well, the truthful, simplest answer is that it's not the same.

 

But to take your unobjective viewpoint and claim that it was the same, the following mental gymnastics must occur...

 

The media is, was, and will forever be in 0bama's pocket, so they must have ignored it.  They gave up the opportunity to destroy a conservative for his words (which were not images gone viral, mind you.)  Makes no sense they would ignore this, they overblow the smallest things, even attempt to create something out of absolutely nothing) to try to attack conservatives and those they choose to side against (does covfefe ring a bell, or is your bell perpetually rung?  Russians?)

 

The media is on a mission to destroy and undermine our current President, not to destroy one of their own (Griffin.)  Was it simply a backfire, where they expected it to have a positive (people would love the images because their intent is to pile as many citizens on the hate Trump bandwagon?) but it actually had the opposite effect?

 

Again, the simple answer is - it's not the same.

 

A cynic may say it was purposefully distributed to have a negative impact on Trump, Given the media behavior and abandoning honest and objective journalism, that's quite possible. Absolutely sinister if true, but very plausible.

 

But the simplest answer is...

 

It's just not the same.

 

Both attacks were the same in being wrong.  But not the same in how it has been handled by the media.  A media who was 10:1, night and day, preferential in treating the previous president MUCH better than the current one.  They've become middle school age buffoons cheerleading for/against their favorites/enemies.

 

So if you believe it's the same and are outraged about the outrage against the Trump images (in that they got MUCH more attention,) then look no further than your mainstream media. If you feel the coverage and outrage is disproportional, then consider that their intents backfired... that more people were outraged by it instead of embracing it as they perhaps intended.

 

But, keep suckling from such misinformation an poor sources if you like.

Quote:It was meant for Dinger Winger. Don't get the chest too puffed up.

DW was my alt account I made when the board was going through it's SQL fits..


LilWD was not me..

Quote:You seem ridiculously confused on this topic, so allow me to outline the disconnect.


Tell me this.


If this was the "same," then why didn't this get the play that Kathy Griffin did?


Well, the truthful, simplest answer is that it's not the same.


But to take your unobjective viewpoint and claim that it was the same, the following mental gymnastics must occur...


The media is, was, and will forever be in 0bama's pocket, so they must have ignored it. They gave up the opportunity to destroy a conservative for his words (which were not images gone viral, mind you.) Makes no sense they would ignore this, they overblow the smallest things, even attempt to create something out of absolutely nothing) to try to attack conservatives and those they choose to side against (does covfefe ring a bell, or is your bell perpetually rung? Russians?)


The media is on a mission to destroy and undermine our current President, not to destroy one of their own (Griffin.) Was it simply a backfire, where they expected it to have a positive (people would love the images because their intent is to pile as many citizens on the hate Trump bandwagon?) but it actually had the opposite effect?


Again, the simple answer is - it's not the same.


A cynic may say it was purposefully distributed to have a negative impact on Trump, Given the media behavior and abandoning honest and objective journalism, that's quite possible. Absolutely sinister if true, but very plausible.


But the simplest answer is...


It's just not the same.


Both attacks were the same in being wrong. But not the same in how it has been handled by the media. A media who was 10:1, night and day, preferential in treating the previous president MUCH better than the current one. They've become middle school age buffoons cheerleading for/against their favorites/enemies.


So if you believe it's the same and are outraged about the outrage against the Trump images (in that they got MUCH more attention,) then look no further than your mainstream media. If you feel the coverage and outrage is disproportional, then consider that their intents backfired... that more people were outraged by it instead of embracing it as they perhaps intended.


But, keep suckling from such misinformation an poor sources if you like.

If you want to talk misinformation. Where was the outrage when GWAR was holding a bloody Trump head long before Griffin ripped it off.


Make no mistake. I hope this buries her unfunny career. But your hypocrisy is annoying.


Does it bother you that Alex Jones would seek to profit of all this non sense.

Well I won't be buying anymore GWAR records then..

Quote:If you want to talk misinformation. Where was the outrage when GWAR was holding a bloody Trump head long before Griffin ripped it off.


Make no mistake. I hope this buries her unfunny career. But your hypocrisy is annoying.

Does it bother you that Alex Jones would seek to profit of all this non sense.

 

Self righteous indignation has always been for sale. It can make you rich. Or President.

Quote:If you want to talk misinformation. Where was the outrage when GWAR was holding a bloody Trump head long before Griffin ripped it off.


Make no mistake. I hope this buries her unfunny career. But your hypocrisy is annoying.


Does it bother you that Alex Jones would seek to profit of all this non sense.

 

You're starting to understand the point, but you seem a few IQ points short of connecting the dots.

 

But you are coming around, that's progress.

Quote:Self righteous indignation has always been for sale. It can make you rich. Or President.

 

Can get you homes in Hawaii, and in DC.  All kinds of riches, free vacations, and other privilege you couldn't earn in the real world with a real job.

Quote:Thanks for the link that Ringo wouldn't provide.


 
I agree, Ted Nugent was every bit as disgusting as Kathy Griffin. I still defend their right to free speech, no matter how offensive, but also the right of their employers and customers to blackball them for it.

Exactly. Freedom of speech does not come without consequences.

Quote:Can get you homes in Hawaii, and in DC.  All kinds of riches, free vacations, and other privilege you couldn't earn in the real world with a real job.

 

Pirk, you do a terrific imitation of Sean Spicer. Flawless. You should try out for America's Got Talent. It could be a second career!

 

Have you converted to Socialism? You're above statement seems to indicate so. Was not Obama's wealth not earned by the capitalist formula? (And without Russian assistance!) Did he not get elected twice by the American people? Were people forced to buy his books? Should it be determined by the state who succeeds and who fails?

 

I understand that doing so much mental gymnastics to justify your boy's incomprehensible ramblings can be tiresome and confusing, but I think you ought to re-think this socialism thing. It's just not you. Trump flak is much more fitting your personality.

Quote:Does it bother you that Alex Jones would seek to profit of all this non sense.

Alex Jones is a tool the same as Griffin is, and not one that is of any actual use.