Quote:I wouldn't quite say sacks are a useless stat, but constant pressure and hitting the QB, whether it's a sack or not, is definitely very important.
Especially when that pressure causes a turnover. Those are always better than sacks.
Quote:Especially when that pressure causes a turnover. Those are always better than sacks.
Especially when those turnovers lead to Touchdowns. Those are always better than just turnovers.
Quote:Especially when those turnovers lead to Touchdowns. Those are always better than just turnovers.
And especially when those TD's lead to wins. Wins are always better than losses.
Quote:And especially when those TD's lead to wins. Wins are always better than losses.
Especially win that win is in the Super Bowl. Super Bowl wins are always better than other wins.
Quote:Especially win that win is in the Super Bowl. Super Bowl wins are always better than other wins.
Especially when that Super Bowl win is in Jacksonville. Super Bowl wins in your home town is always better than Super Bowls in another stadium.
Quote:Especially when that Super Bowl win is in Jacksonville. Super Bowl wins in your home town is always better than Super Bowls in another stadium.
Unfortunately there will not be another Super Bowl in Jacksonville.
Quote:What?
You don't have the Instinct.
Quote:People focus so much on sacks. They are overrated and a useless stat. What I expect is to see whoever we sign in the backfield often and contributing to a disruptive pass rush along with other players.
Sacks are an extremely important stat as they 100% of the time guarantee a loss of yards.
Quote:Sacks are an extremely important stat as they 100% of the time guarantee a loss of yards.
Loss of yards is great, but what matters is making sure the QB cannot sit back there 5+ seconds and pick the secondary a part. Pressure > sacks.