Quote:No it wasn't. The game was certainly exciting, but if you are a Jaguars fan, nothing beats how we sent Jimmy Johnson and Dan Marino into retirement.
It certainly is a matter of opinion, not fact.
To most people, that was the most exciting ever. It's a matter of opinion.
Quote:It certainly is a matter of opinion, not fact.
To most people, that was the most exciting ever. It's a matter of opinion.
Most people don't like it when a game is decided by the overtime coin toss. That is exactly what happened.
Quote:Most people don't like it when a game is decided by the overtime coin toss. That is exactly what happened.
Most people dont like blowouts either
Quote:Most people don't like it when a game is decided by the overtime coin toss. That is exactly what happened.
A coin toss???? What about two last minute Hail Marys just to tie the game or the 100 yard pick 6 called back or how about you don't leave the best player on their offense wide open and than forget how to tackle I'm sorry your teams suck
Quote:Faarrrrrrrr<span style="font-size:8px;">rrrr away.</span>
Yep, as in another galaxy.
Quote:I'm glad for Fitzgerald, though. It couldn't have happened for a nicer guy.
Yeah. Julius Peppers would be the equivalent on Green Bay for me.
Quote:He is 100% correct on this one. The Packers called tails. It was tails. Because the coin did not flip, it had to be tossed again. It came up heads. So Green Bay was screwed out of receiving the ball in overtime.
As usual, you're WRONG. If you read the re-cap, both coin flips came up HEADS after the Packers called TAILS. They re-did the toss since the first one didn't flip. Rodgers said he wanted to call it heads the second time but wasn't given the opportunity.
Where do you come up with this stuff and present them as fact when they're not?
<a class="bbc_url" href='http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2014/story/_/id/14587101/green-bay-packers-left-scratching-heads-coin-toss-catch-ruling-loss-arizona-cardinals'>http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2014/story/_/id/14587101/green-bay-packers-left-scratching-heads-coin-toss-catch-ruling-loss-arizona-cardinals</a>
Quote:As usual, you're WRONG. If you read the re-cap, both coin flips came up HEADS after the Packers called TAILS. They re-did the toss since the first one didn't flip. Rodgers said he wanted to call it heads the second time but wasn't given the opportunity.
Where do you come up with this stuff and present them as fact when they're not?
<a class="bbc_url" href='http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2014/story/_/id/14587101/green-bay-packers-left-scratching-heads-coin-toss-catch-ruling-loss-arizona-cardinals'>http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2014/story/_/id/14587101/green-bay-packers-left-scratching-heads-coin-toss-catch-ruling-loss-arizona-cardinals</a>
She probably reads too much of Rolling Stone magazine.
Quote:A coin toss? What about two last minute Hail Marys just to tie the game or the 100 yard pick 6 called back or how about you don't leave the best player on their offense wide open and then forget how to tackle I'm sorry your teams suck.
I am guessing you want to think I am wrong about the significance of a botched coin toss.