Quote:I saw him panicking with Dallas' 2nd stringers, i can't imagine how bad he would look playing Seattles starters.
Just flop down at every snap, I'm sure.
Quote:I agree that it was, but it definitely shone a light on just how ham handed and socially inept the Front Office was. Was it a good choice? I agree that it was. Was it poorly handled? A drunken monkey with Asperger's could have handled that situation more deftly.
It was as poorly handled as the Leftwich release was a few years earlier. In both instances, the front office showed a high level of ineptitude. I think we've got a better bunch in control now.
Regardless of how Garrard was unceremoniously dumped, it was the right move for the team as validated by his career coming to a quiet end. Gabbert had nothing to do with that situation. He found a way to stink on his own. Nobody is opining the departure, and I'm not really sure why some folks around here feel compelled to dredge it up. He's gone. The team is in a much better place today. It's okay to move on (not speaking to you on this, but to the intent of this thread).
We didn't act fast enough.
We should have cut Gabbert years before getting the trade offer.
That way we can fake that we cared more than anybody, that we're angrier than anybody, and that we want to win more than anybody.
That would've shown everybody, that's what that would have done.
SF has stunk every since the trade. Even Harbough left.
Quote:If we still had Gabbert I'd have to visit this famous Jaguars landmark. RIP to the ones that weren't strong enough to wait out the Gabbert era.
![[Image: 29197.jpg]](https://www.jaxdailyrecord.com/storyimages/29197.jpg)
This is the funniest thing I've read yet on this MB.
Quote:Pretty much agree, but his termination was pretty classless. They introduced him at a luncheon as the starting QB and then fired him less than 2 hours later.
It's hard to believe that could actually happen, but it did.