Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Kam Chancellor would be incredible here.  I would gladly trade a 3rd, 6th from Scobee, and maybe even a future 3rd to get him.

 

He would be worth it.  

So glad some of yall ain't our gm.

Do you even football?

I won't believe this franchise is serious about winning until we at least make a serious effort when players like him become approachable.  

 

They always seem to go to the same teams..  right, the winning teams..

Lol

One thought about why it might be too risky for the Jaguars to trade for Kam Chancellor.  Being that Chancellor is already 27 with plenty of wear and tear,  by the time the Jags are positioned as a consistent Super Bowl contender,  Chancellor's value might be substantially less.  

 

Though a contract extension probably wouldn't hurt the Jags because of the team's excellent salary cap situation,  the trade compensation could ultimately set the team back.   At the very least,  it's something for the Jags brass to weigh.  

Quote:I won't believe this franchise is serious about winning until we at least make a serious effort when players like him become approachable.


They always seem to go to the same teams.. right, the winning teams..

Dude chill. He's not going anywhere unless they get some offer that's too hard to pass up aka to much for a team to give up.

NYG are looking for trade this morning. He can be had.

Quote:Why trade away a valuable pick and player for someone who will most likely be a free agent at the end of the year? You don't overpay for someone like that because they are trying to get rid of him. They either gonna have to pay him or let him test FA because they need to resign Irvin, Kam and Okung. And can only Franchise Tag 1. So the post lacks irrelevance. But one can only dream I suppose.

He has 3 years left on his deal...

Quote:NYG are looking for trade this morning. He can be had.

Any player can be had. But it might cost an arm, a leg, and your first born child.


The Hawks hold ALL the cards in this one. They can choose to play hard ball let him sit and not pay him anything. He has 3 years left on his deal. He has to eventually show up by week 10 for him to accrue a year so he has no choice but to show up right when the Hawks are making their mid-season push.


If they decide to trade him, again it's on their terms. There's no rush or pressure to move him. They can sit back and entertain offers for the next 3 years if they so choose until they get the one that they deem worthy.

Hell I would give a 1st and a 3rd for Kam and Irvin

Keep the picks, we aren't one player away from being great. It would be nice to stop getting burned deep, he is a good player, but I think we do more with the draft picks.

Quote:Well they just traded FOR Kelcie McCray so there may be some merit to this

 

Kelcie McCray is a former UDFA, who has played for 3 different NFL teams in 3 years and has ZERO career starts. Our FO might be using this trade to make clear to Kam that there is no way his contract will be addressed, but in no way McCray is a replacement for Kam Chancellor.

 

I don't know much about McCray and maybe he'll turn out good, but for now he's just a depth move, who can apparently play both safety positions (remember that Earl Thomas is also just returning after injury and may not be 100% yet at start of the season) and Ive also read he's a great special team player.

 

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/20...cial-teams

I want Kam Kam in a Jags jersey.

I like Cam, but what ppl in this thread are suggesting we give up for him is crazy...


A second or third rd pick for a player causing his current team drama should be more than enough to get him.


No need to give up our entire draft plus Cyp for one guy.

One problem with trading for Chancellor.

 

The whole reason this is being discussed is because he is holding out.

 

He is holding out because he wants to redo his deal.

 

His current deal has three (3) years remaining on it.

 

The Jaguars' longstanding practice is not to rework a deal that has more than one year remaining (see MJD).

 

In order to trade for Chancellor, the team would have to rework his deal.

 

While he undoubtedly is a scheme fit and would upgrade the secondary, reworking his deal with more than a year remaining would set a bad, and destabilizing precedent.

Quote:One problem with trading for Chancellor.


The whole reason this is being discussed is because he is holding out.


He is holding out because he wants to redo his deal.


His current deal has three (3) years remaining on it.


The Jaguars' longstanding practice is not to rework a deal that has more than one year remaining (see MJD).


In order to trade for Chancellor, the team would have to rework his deal.


While he undoubtedly is a scheme fit and would upgrade the secondary, reworking his deal with more than a year remaining would set a bad, and destabilizing precedent.

Idk. It's a little different restructuring for a new player in order to facilitate a trade than it is restructuring a current player

Seeing as it's a Seahawks player I figured we'd be the first place he'd go.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/201...hancellor/