Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Trump to rewrite Constitution with executive order

#61

The UK never lost its great thanks!
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#62

(11-02-2018, 01:05 AM)lastonealive Wrote: The UK never lost its great thanks!

Whatever you say, Mr. Immigrant.
Reply

#63

(11-01-2018, 01:09 AM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote:
(10-31-2018, 08:09 PM)mikesez Wrote: Yeah just Germany, France, United Kingdom, and Ireland. Just countries accounting for about half of the population of Europe.

Germanyprior to 2000 Germany had its nationality law based entirely on jus sanguinis, but now children born on or after 1 January 2000 to non-ethnic German descent parents acquire German citizenship at birth, if at least one parent has a permanent residence permit (and had this status for at least three years) and the parent was residing in Germany for at least eight years.

France:Children born in France (including overseas territories) to at least one parent who is also born in France automatically acquire French citizenship at birth (double jus soli).

A child born in France to foreign parents may acquire French citizenship:[3]
  • at birth, if stateless.

  • at 18, if resident in France with at least 5 years' residence since age 11.

  • between 16 and 18 upon request by the child and if resident in France with at least 5 years' residence since age 11.

  • between 13 and 16 upon request by the child's parents and if resident in France continuously since age 8.

  • if born in France of parents born before independence in a colony/territory in the past under French sovereignty.
    • at birth, if born in France before January 1, 1994.
    • at age 18, if born in France on or after January 1, 1994.

United Kingdom: Since 1 January 1983, at least one parent must be a British citizen or be legally "settled" in the country or upon the 10th birthday of the child regardless of their parent's citizenship status 

Ireland: On 1 January 2005, the law was amended to require that at least one of the parents be an Irish citizen; a British citizen; a resident with a permanent right to reside in Ireland or In Northern Ireland; or a legal resident residing three of the last four years in the country (excluding students and asylum seekers) (see Irish nationality law).[39] The amendment was prompted by the case of Man Chen, a Chinese woman living in mainland United Kingdom who travelled to Belfast (Northern Ireland, part of the UK) to give birth in order to benefit from the previous rule whereby anyone born on any part of the island of Ireland was automatically granted Irish citizenship. The Chinese parents used their daughter's Irish (and thereby European Union) citizenship to obtain permanent residence in the UK as parents of a dependent EU citizen. Ireland was the last country in Europe to abolish unrestricted jus soli.


Interestingly enough, not one of those countries you mention allow a foreigner to enter the country illegally, cop a squat and give birth to a brand new, unrestricted free citizen.

Is this how immigrants give birth? They cop a squat?

Making America Great Again by slowly paring away the things that made it great in the first place.
If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley

[Image: kiWL4mF.jpg]
 
Reply

#64

(11-02-2018, 10:35 AM)rollerjag Wrote:
(11-01-2018, 01:09 AM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: Germanyprior to 2000 Germany had its nationality law based entirely on jus sanguinis, but now children born on or after 1 January 2000 to non-ethnic German descent parents acquire German citizenship at birth, if at least one parent has a permanent residence permit (and had this status for at least three years) and the parent was residing in Germany for at least eight years.

France:Children born in France (including overseas territories) to at least one parent who is also born in France automatically acquire French citizenship at birth (double jus soli).

A child born in France to foreign parents may acquire French citizenship:[3]
  • at birth, if stateless.

  • at 18, if resident in France with at least 5 years' residence since age 11.

  • between 16 and 18 upon request by the child and if resident in France with at least 5 years' residence since age 11.

  • between 13 and 16 upon request by the child's parents and if resident in France continuously since age 8.

  • if born in France of parents born before independence in a colony/territory in the past under French sovereignty.
    • at birth, if born in France before January 1, 1994.
    • at age 18, if born in France on or after January 1, 1994.

United Kingdom: Since 1 January 1983, at least one parent must be a British citizen or be legally "settled" in the country or upon the 10th birthday of the child regardless of their parent's citizenship status 

Ireland: On 1 January 2005, the law was amended to require that at least one of the parents be an Irish citizen; a British citizen; a resident with a permanent right to reside in Ireland or In Northern Ireland; or a legal resident residing three of the last four years in the country (excluding students and asylum seekers) (see Irish nationality law).[39] The amendment was prompted by the case of Man Chen, a Chinese woman living in mainland United Kingdom who travelled to Belfast (Northern Ireland, part of the UK) to give birth in order to benefit from the previous rule whereby anyone born on any part of the island of Ireland was automatically granted Irish citizenship. The Chinese parents used their daughter's Irish (and thereby European Union) citizenship to obtain permanent residence in the UK as parents of a dependent EU citizen. Ireland was the last country in Europe to abolish unrestricted jus soli.


Interestingly enough, not one of those countries you mention allow a foreigner to enter the country illegally, cop a squat and give birth to a brand new, unrestricted free citizen.

Is this how immigrants give birth? They cop a squat?

Making America Great Again by slowly paring away the things that made it great in the first place.

That’s actually how a lot of women give birth. Not having a uterus, maybe you’re not up on the different and very beneficial birthing positions. 

https://www.babyprepping.com/pregnancy-p...ing-birth/
What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???
Reply

#65

(11-02-2018, 11:02 AM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote:
(11-02-2018, 10:35 AM)rollerjag Wrote: Is this how immigrants give birth? They cop a squat?

Making America Great Again by slowly paring away the things that made it great in the first place.

That’s actually how a lot of women give birth. Not having a uterus, maybe you’re not up on the different and very beneficial birthing positions. 

https://www.babyprepping.com/pregnancy-p...ing-birth/

[Image: tenor.gif]
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#66

The Australian head of state is British? Of course the queen is British.
Reply

#67

(11-02-2018, 11:02 AM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote:
(11-02-2018, 10:35 AM)rollerjag Wrote: Is this how immigrants give birth? They cop a squat?

Making America Great Again by slowly paring away the things that made it great in the first place.

That’s actually how a lot of women give birth. Not having a uterus, maybe you’re not up on the different and very beneficial birthing positions. 

https://www.babyprepping.com/pregnancy-p...ing-birth/

Oh, and of course that's your mind set when you posted.
If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley

[Image: kiWL4mF.jpg]
 
Reply

#68

(11-01-2018, 11:19 PM)TJBender Wrote:
(11-01-2018, 11:12 PM)MalabarJag Wrote: I was talking about prominent Dem Senators and Congressmen. Not a single Dem has called them out on it. That's a bit more important than some trailer-dweller, and every prominent Republican has disavowed the racists.

Most tellingly, the Kavanaugh character assassination had every Dem senator (but one) put Hate above country.

You call a party-line vote "hate above country"? I call it politics.

Never until Trump was elected has any party just ignored the qualifications of a nominee and voted to support character assassination. The logical explanation for voting "no" on a candidate as highly qualified as Kavanaugh is hatred of Trump, a hatred which was put above country. 

And if you want to claim that it was a vote about his actions 30 years ago, where there was zero-point-zero supporting evidence, then the willingness of the Dems to cast aside presumption of innocence in order to justify their votes makes an even stronger case. Note also that Gorsuch got only three Dem votes from senators in highly Republican states.





                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"
Reply

#69

(11-02-2018, 09:30 PM)MalabarJag Wrote:
(11-01-2018, 11:19 PM)TJBender Wrote: You call a party-line vote "hate above country"? I call it politics.

Never until Trump was elected has any party just ignored the qualifications of a nominee and voted to support character assassination. The logical explanation for voting "no" on a candidate as highly qualified as Kavanaugh is hatred of Trump, a hatred which was put above country. 

And if you want to claim that it was a vote about his actions 30 years ago, where there was zero-point-zero supporting evidence, then the willingness of the Dems to cast aside presumption of innocence in order to justify their votes makes an even stronger case. Note also that Gorsuch got only three Dem votes from senators in highly Republican states.


it was less than 30 years ago that Kavanaugh behaved as a naked partisan, first in service of Ken Starr and then and service of George W Bush.
so there were plenty of reasons to oppose his nomination that had nothing to do with Donald Trump and nothing to do with allegations of sexual harassment. If you are somebody was hoping for less partisanship, Kavanaugh's record of employment is highly concerning. Of course he confirmed all of those concerns in his final testimony to the Senate, making it much more hostile and partisan than it was already.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#70

(11-02-2018, 09:01 PM)rollerjag Wrote:
(11-02-2018, 11:02 AM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: That’s actually how a lot of women give birth. Not having a uterus, maybe you’re not up on the different and very beneficial birthing positions. 

https://www.babyprepping.com/pregnancy-p...ing-birth/

Oh, and of course that's your mind set when you posted.

Another swing and a miss...I gave birth that way, so yeah, it was. Congratulations on trying to make birthing positions somehow racist though.  Rolleyes
What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???
Reply

#71

(11-02-2018, 11:55 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote:
(11-02-2018, 09:01 PM)rollerjag Wrote: Oh, and of course that's your mind set when you posted.

Another swing and a miss...I gave birth that way, so yeah, it was. Congratulations on trying to make birthing positions somehow racist though.  Rolleyes

So you dropped your kid on his head right out of the gate??
Reply

#72

(11-03-2018, 12:52 AM)homebiscuit Wrote:
(11-02-2018, 11:55 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: Another swing and a miss...I gave birth that way, so yeah, it was. Congratulations on trying to make birthing positions somehow racist though.  Rolleyes

So you dropped your kid on his head right out of the gate??

I've never heard it called "The gate" before, but I've always been fond of "The Vulvarine."

(11-02-2018, 09:38 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(11-02-2018, 09:30 PM)MalabarJag Wrote: Never until Trump was elected has any party just ignored the qualifications of a nominee and voted to support character assassination. The logical explanation for voting "no" on a candidate as highly qualified as Kavanaugh is hatred of Trump, a hatred which was put above country. 

And if you want to claim that it was a vote about his actions 30 years ago, where there was zero-point-zero supporting evidence, then the willingness of the Dems to cast aside presumption of innocence in order to justify their votes makes an even stronger case. Note also that Gorsuch got only three Dem votes from senators in highly Republican states.


it was less than 30 years ago that Kavanaugh behaved as a naked partisan, first in service of Ken Starr and then and service of George W Bush.
so there were plenty of reasons to oppose his nomination that had nothing to do with Donald Trump and nothing to do with allegations of sexual harassment. If you are somebody was hoping for less partisanship, Kavanaugh's record of employment is highly concerning. Of course he confirmed all of those concerns in his final testimony to the Senate, making it much more hostile and partisan than it was already.

You're so bad at this, you made his damn point for him. They skipped the valid reasons entirely and voted because of the patently false, completely partisan one. You want so badly to be seen as this intellectual power that you repeatedly talk yourself into these corners. Sad.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

#73
Big Grin 

(11-02-2018, 11:02 AM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: That’s actually how a lot of women give birth. Not having a uterus, maybe you’re not up on the different and very beneficial birthing positions. 

https://www.babyprepping.com/pregnancy-p...ing-birth/

Very efficient position...……....can also be used for conception!
When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#74
(This post was last modified: 11-03-2018, 10:08 AM by mikesez.)

(11-03-2018, 07:53 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote:
(11-02-2018, 09:38 PM)mikesez Wrote: it was less than 30 years ago that Kavanaugh behaved as a naked partisan, first in service of Ken Starr and then and service of George W Bush.
so there were plenty of reasons to oppose his nomination that had nothing to do with Donald Trump and nothing to do with allegations of sexual harassment. If you are somebody was hoping for less partisanship, Kavanaugh's record of employment is highly concerning. Of course he confirmed all of those concerns in his final testimony to the Senate, making it much more hostile and partisan than it was already.

You're so bad at this, you made his damn point for him. They skipped the valid reasons entirely and voted because of the patently false, completely partisan one. You want so badly to be seen as this intellectual power that you repeatedly talk yourself into these corners. Sad.

Malabar Jag seems unaware of the fact that there were non sexual allegations against Kavanaugh.
if Malabar Jags whole point is that the Kavanaugh episode makes Democrats and their voters look bad, I agree.
But it also makes Republicans and their voters look bad.
You have to remember that the Kavanaugh hearings took place over a course of months, and the sexual stuff did not become public until the very last month. 
The Democrats in the Senate did indeed put forward the same arguments about him being too partisan that I just put forward.
But nobody cared. 
The Republicans in the Senate were not moved by arguments for fair play.
The media did not make a big deal about it.
The Democratic party voters were not highly engaged.
Shame on all of us.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

#75

(11-03-2018, 12:52 AM)homebiscuit Wrote:
(11-02-2018, 11:55 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: Another swing and a miss...I gave birth that way, so yeah, it was. Congratulations on trying to make birthing positions somehow racist though.  Rolleyes

So you dropped your kid on his head right out of the gate??

They’re very resilient at that age. Tongue
What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???
Reply

#76

(11-03-2018, 09:55 AM)mikesez Wrote:
(11-03-2018, 07:53 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote:

You're so bad at this, you made his damn point for him. They skipped the valid reasons entirely and voted because of the patently false, completely partisan one. You want so badly to be seen as this intellectual power that you repeatedly talk yourself into these corners. Sad.

Malabar Jag seems unaware of the fact that there were non sexual allegations against Kavanaugh.
if Malabar Jags whole point is that the Kavanaugh episode makes Democrats and their voters look bad, I agree.
But it also makes Republicans and their voters look bad.
You have to remember that the Kavanaugh hearings took place over a course of months, and the sexual stuff did not become public until the very last month. 
The Democrats in the Senate did indeed put forward the same arguments about him being too partisan that I just put forward.
But nobody cared. 
The Republicans in the Senate were not moved by arguments for fair play.
The media did not make a big deal about it.
The Democratic party voters were not highly engaged.
Shame on all of us.

Shame on you maybe, I was pro-Kav and glad that, like Voltaire, my enemies are ridiculous.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

#77

The lunacy of some in this thread... Kavanaugh was the most qualified and as or more honorable of character than any justice since Scalia or Kennedy.

His character assassination was pure fabrication. A sick, inexcusable partisan attack.

More than that, it sets the tone for every single nomination moving forward. It's the blueprint for baseless opposition attacks.

That is what the divisive, destructive radical left has contributed to changing politics forever. If you were fine with that circus, then congratulations. You are just as responsible for it.
"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#78

Sounds like you have had a nice dose of fox news.

A loyal servant.
Reply

#79

(11-07-2018, 09:39 PM)lastonealive Wrote: Sounds like you have had a nice dose of fox news.

A loyal servant.

Not as loyal as fabricating a sexual assault charge for political gain. Like all of the Kavaccusers.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

#80

(11-07-2018, 09:15 PM)pirkster Wrote: The lunacy of some in this thread... Kavanaugh was the most qualified and as or more honorable of character than any justice since Scalia or Kennedy.

His character assassination was pure fabrication.  A sick, inexcusable partisan attack.

More than that, it sets the tone for every single nomination moving forward.  It's the blueprint for baseless opposition attacks.

That is what the divisive, destructive radical left has contributed to changing politics forever.  If you were fine with that circus, then congratulations.  You are just as responsible for it.

Sets the table?  This was a dry run.  God Forbid anything happen to the 'notorious' RBG you aint seen NOTHING!  Oh and if they have to break the Biden Rule...
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!