Login

Bullseye · 03-23-2019, 11:00 PM

(03-23-2019, 10:15 PM)surfon Wrote: So the phins can trade tannehill for mult picks and we couldn't get anything for bortles.

1. Tannehill did not have as bad of a reputation as Bortles did.

2. We DID manage to get a 6th round pick out of Gabbert...so perhaps things balanced out.

Worst to 1st. Curse Reversed!

JackCity · 03-23-2019, 11:18 PM

(03-23-2019, 10:15 PM)surfon Wrote: So the phins can trade tannehill for mult picks and we couldn't get anything for bortles.

The Phins ate part of the contract

surfon · 03-25-2019, 01:48 PM

(03-23-2019, 11:18 PM)JackCity Wrote:
(03-23-2019, 10:15 PM)surfon Wrote: So the phins can trade tannehill for mult picks and we couldn't get anything for bortles.

The Phins ate part of the contract

Bet that tasted good. Aren't we taking a big cap hit for bottles? Guess I don't get the diff.

HandsomeRob86 · 03-25-2019, 10:04 PM

(03-25-2019, 01:48 PM)surfon Wrote:
(03-23-2019, 11:18 PM)JackCity Wrote: The Phins ate part of the contract

Bet that tasted good. Aren't we taking a big cap hit for bottles? Guess I don't get the diff.

Tannehill is quite a bit better than Bortles, and actually costs a bit less. His problems is injuries, otherwise Tannehill is a perfectly average starting QB. Bortles is a borderline starter at best, at this point. Also Tannehill is a lot more accurate than Bortles (mid sixties vs high fifties).

Yes, it's improvement, but it's Blaine Gabbert 2012 level improvement. - Pirkster

http://youtu.be/ouGM3NWpjxk The Home Hypnotist!

http://youtu.be/XQRFkn0Ly3A Media on the Brain Link!

Quote:Peyton must store oxygen in that forehead of his. No way I'd still be alive after all that choking.