Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
The Case for Going QB Early (Long)

#61

(03-26-2020, 10:09 AM)Upper Wrote:
(03-25-2020, 08:09 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: The history of this team includes plenty of horrible offensive drafting, but recently the draft has been more defensively focused and the offensive picks have been mostly fine. 

Bortles in 2014 and Fournette chosen way too early in 2017 are the only bad offensive picks in the past 6 drafts.
 (unless you are all in on Cam Robinson being a bad pick at this stage)

Yeldon, Lee, and Cann were bad picks on my ledger too. Just counting first 3 rounders.

Yeldon and Cann were both from a weak draft. Hindsight is 20/20 and I'm sure you can find better players picked after them (David Johnson instead of Yeldon for sure), but for each "better player" picked in rounds 2 and 3 that year I could find at least five that were worse. Cann had a stellar rookie season as a guard, but has declined ever since. I'm sure the Gus culture and lack of OL coaching were a significant factor in his case.


Lee seemed to be good value at the time. He has had constant injuries issues and never turned into the WR he was expected to be. I'm not sure if the injuries were the reason he never looked all that good even when healthy (although he did lead the Jags in receptions in 2017), but it could be the explanation.

I do agree that drafting a RB high in this day and age (Yeldon and Fournette) is almost always a mistake.



                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#62

(03-25-2020, 12:01 AM)Bullseye Wrote:
(03-24-2020, 05:06 PM)Caldrac Wrote: My thoughts with the first eight picks in the draft is that realistically there's a good chance you're not going to see Chase Young, Jeffrey Okudah nor Isaiah Simmons slip to us with the 9th overall pick. I like Derrick Brown. And he may or may not be there. It would be hard for me. I like Andrew Thomas at LT. But I think he's a better run blocker than pass blocker, and this is from watching a lot of Georgia games. He's rated highly in pass protection because they rarely pass the damn football. I don't really know how well he'll hold up in pass protection at this level. 

Wirfs is a freak of nature. Becton is too. But he seems more raw. Wills is another freak of nature but him and Wirfs BOTH have not had much experience at LT. That concerns me with our team's current situation. I like any one of those receivers there though. Jeudy, Lamb and Ruggs. I think you're getting an excellent compliment to Chark. BUT. . . I really like Jefferson as a slot receiver at the next level. And you could possibly get him at 20 later on that night. 

Young is a no brainer at 9. Okudah is a no brainer at 9. Simmons is a no brainer at 9. Derrick Brown? I don't know. I like Kinlaw a little bit more in the pass rushing department. And I think later on between Neville Gallimore, McTelvin Agim, Khalil Davis & Jordan Elliot that we can get a pretty good DL3T. And I like Leki Fotu and Benito Jones as DL1T. 

So. . . tough call. But, if for whatever odd reason that Young, Okudah or Simmons slip to us at 9? I am running up to the podium with their names on the card. Just like last year where we all really, really, really WANTED Hockenson at TE. But Josh Allen at DE was just too damn good to pass up on. That was a gift. You can't mess that up.

As of now. Based on how I *think" the first eight picks are going to play out. My choices would be:

1. One of the top three overall defensive players magically fell for the taking between Young, Okudah & Simmons
2. Best WR on your draft board is selected between Jeudy, Lamb & Ruggs
3. Trade down a little bit and see if you can still gain Kinlaw at DT, Ruggs or Lamb at WR or Becton at LT

That's my ideal scenario right now.

So now, my question is how does taking Young, Okudah, Simmons or Brown (for that matter) at 9 directly help Minshew?  Would it be possible to help Minshew directly with picks after a defensive player at 9?  So what's the difference between taking a defensive player at 9 and a QB at 9 if the team thought there was a franchise QB at 9?

(03-24-2020, 04:53 PM)MalabarJag Wrote:
I read Caldrac's post as expecting the Jags to take an offensive player based on the free agent signings, not that that's what he wants.

Personally I'd be appalled if the Jags passed on any of those defensive players you named and picked a WR. I could be OK with taking the top-rated OT instead of Simmons, mainly because he doesn't fit neatly into an NFL defense. Trading down might be an option too, although Caldwell has never traded down in the first few rounds. I don't think he knows how.
(emphasis added)

Same questions to you I posed to Caldrac,

If the primary goal is giving Minshew weapons, how does taking one of those defensive players at 9 accomplish that goal?

It doesn't of course. Just because you have a "primary goal" doesn't mean that you have to do something stupid if the choices don't fit your goal.

Picking a QB at 9 could end up being incredibly stupid too, for three reasons:


1) The usual reason that our pick could be the next QB bust (there have been plenty in recent years even excluding Bortles and Gabbert).
2) Minshew could turn out to be a top five QB (while unlikely, it's not extremely unlikely).
3) If Minshew fails badly enough we are likely in position to draft Lawrence.

Those last two factors didn't exist when the Jags passed on Watson and Mahomes (and Wilson).

In this draft there will be plenty of WR upgrades in rounds 2 and 3, and I've seen plenty of mocks where one of the top three WR and/or OT will still be there at pick 20. It's a crapshoot as to who is the best among the top three at both positions.



                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"
Reply

#63

(03-25-2020, 06:32 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:
(03-24-2020, 03:53 PM)Bullseye Wrote: (Emphasis added)


Though in my original post, I discuss taking QB early this year and possibly next year, in the most immediate context, I'm talking about this year.  Remember, we don't know how the draft position think will pan out next year.  Even if Trevor Lawrence and J. Fields have great years, declare themselves draft eligible, and are the top two signal callers, we don't know whether we'll be in position to draft either of them with or without having to trade up to get them.  This leaves us with this year.  As of this year, we haven't taken a QB high in the past two seasons. 


You continue with the imminently fair observation that it can take a while to know what you have in a player at that position.  But if Minshew is still an unknown (at least not fully known) quantity, why would you consider changing your draft priorities to accommodate him?  If an independent objective analysis of the available talent on the boars shows the best player is on defense, why would you draft a weapon for Minshew?  (I know exactly why and I an fairly certain those of you reading know why too, but I'd like to see the reasoning.)

But to continue on this theme, this carries into the last emphasized point.

For those of you arguing the draft's focus should be on helping Minshew, do you now assert that any pick other than a WR or LT (those positions that might be of most direct help to Minshew which appear to be worth at or near that draft spot) at 9 would be a mistake?


Okay, you've raised several points, so here is my response.  

1.  Talking about this year- I know we didn't spend a high draft pick on Minshew, but from where we are now, with him arguably being one of the best, if not the best, rookie QB of 2019, we're in the same position as if we had spent a high draft pick on a QB, in fact we're in a better position, because added to that is the fact that it looks like the pick might work out and we might have a QB who was actually worthy of a high draft pick.  So it's as if we exercised a high draft pick on a QB AND the player panned out for us, which is not a given for any highly drafted QB.  A lot of them bust.  

Minshew did as well as the #1 overall pick and offensive rookie of the year, Kyler Murray.  So we might as well assume that we spent a top five pick on Minshew and he was worth it.  So, since we are now in the position we would have been in if we had spent a top 5 pick on Minshew and he had panned out as worth it, why in the world would we do it again a year later? 

2.  Your next point- if the best player available on the board when it's our turn to pick is a defensive player, why would we draft a weapon for Minshew instead?  I don't think I ever said I would.  I would do what's best for the team.  I'm sure we'll pick players on both sides of the ball.  

But here's an important point- if we package the 9th and 20th picks to move up to, for example, 5th, and pick, for example, Tua, we would be giving up the 9th and 20th picks.  I don't think it would be wise to give up, say, Derrick Brown and Krystian Fulton, or, say, the best LT and a really good WR, in order to "give Minshew competition."  I don't think our priority should be giving our starting QB some competition.  I think our priority should be to build our team while we see if last year's arguably best rookie QB can continue to develop.


3.  Your posted opinion seems to be based on the assumption that this is our last best opportunity to get a QB in the draft.  That is obviously not the case.  This is not the kind of team that will go 8-8 if Minshew fails.  We're not that good.  If Minshew fails, we could be 4-12.  And add the Rams' pick (and that 2021 pick will most likely be a lot better than this year's 20th overall pick), and we have plenty of ammo to move up and get a QB in 2021.  If Minshew fails, we could wind up with the 5th and 12th picks in the draft.  If Minshew fails, we would probably be in a better draft position next year than we are this year.  If Minshew fails, we'll not only have better picks to use next year, we'll also have a better team to put around the next guy.

So, the two hypotheticals - that Minshew fails AND we lose our chance to get a QB - those are incompatible events.

4.  I wonder if you and some others are suffering from what could be called "6th round bias."  If we had drafted him 5th overall last year, and he had had the exact same season as the one he had, would you still be wanting to draft another one this year?  

For me, I'm not saying Minshew is definitely the guy, but as long as there is a chance that we have our guy, we should not waste valuable draft picks on another one who could just as easily bust.  Minshew is much more of a known quantity than any prospect in the draft this year other than Joe Burrow, and we can't get Joe Burrow.  

So all the above is why I say no to using a high pick on a QB this year.  If you think last year's rookie has a chance of being the guy, then you build the team while you find out.

(Numbering added.)

1.  Agreed completely he played well enough last year to earn some benefit of the doubt.

2.  Not trying to put words in your mouth or deliberately misrepresent you, but that seems kinda implicit when it comes to placing the draft "focus" on putting weapons around Minshew.

3.  Not necessarily.  Your premise behind this statement assumes several things: 
  • There will be a draft next year in no way impacted by the current coronavirus outbreak.
  • That if Minshew fails, we wiill automatically be in a position to get a QB.
Neither are guaranteed propositions
  • That if Marrone/Caldwell were somehow replaced, his non interimsuccessor wouldn't have a different assessment of Minshew
If the season and subsequent seasons proceed as normal, then this portion of your argument has merit.  Minshew plays and either shows enough to keep him or to keep looking for the guy.    But Heaven forbid this season get cancelled.  Draft order is determined by games played.  If there are no games played what then?  Do they revert to this year's order?  Ifo so, Cincy has the  top pick and we are back at 9.  Even though they may be more willing to trade it away if they already have Burrow, they may only be marginally more willing to let him go at a substantially lower price than they would let go of Burrow this year.  By this time next year, barring something unforseen, we'll have at least FIVE (5) picks fewer with which to negotiate from the 2022 draft (standard 7 pick draft allotment minus extra picks in 1st, 4th 5h and 6th rounds).  Remember, it took Kansas City FIFTY (50) years to go from Len Dawson (their first franchise QB) to Patrick Mahomes, their next franchise QB.  They don't exactly grow on trees, and when they do appear, you have to be in a position to get him.

Regarding Minshew's potential failures,, there is varying degrees of failure.  Suppose Minshew starts off hot then crashes and burns and we finish 5-11.  Based upon this year's draft order, that would put us around 5th or 6th.  While that is decent draft position, if we were interested in Lawrence or perhaps Fields, we'd likely be out of the running without a substantial trade up (without the extra picks we could use), and whichever team has the top pick likely won't be inclined to deal down.

The last bullet point is pretty mich self explanatory. 

While we indeed could still land our desired QB in 2021 if Minshew fails, there is a lot that makes that less likely.

4.  That is fair speculation, one I do not completely discount.  While his 6th round status did not preclude him from playing as well as he did (it certainly didn't hurt Brady's career at all), part of my argument hinges on the fact taking a QB high this year would not violate the unwritten rule about taking QBs in the first round in successive years because Minshew was a 6th rounder.  That aside, there is still the possible remainder of lingering doubt as to why/how Minshew lasted that long in the first place.  I mean this IS the website where #becausejaguars originated, is it not?  Getting a franchise QB in he 6th round doesn't happen for us, does it?  I'm no mind reader, but I submit underneath all of the excitement surrounding Minshew mania here among Jaguars fans, there is an undercurrent of waiting to see  when and how the wheels fall off of this thing.

To be clear, I am not DOWN on Minshew.

His rookie year was promising and is enough to cause reasonable and knowledgeable people (on the team and on the boards) to put faith in him.  Given the weaknesses on this team and how the board seems likely to fall, there is justification for loading up on offense in this draft.  But given our draft position the availability of QB a broad consensus of observers feel could be of first round caliber, the overwhelming depth of the WR position in this draft, and our abundance of draft capital we have over the next twoyears, if there is a time to over saturate the position in our quest to find that franchise signal caller, it's now.
 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!





Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!