Lots and lots of talent left on the board. If we have some of these players graded similarly this could present a good opportunity to acquire a few more picks.
I'd be fine with that. I'm expecting a Running Back in the next two rounds though whether we stand pat or trade back.
Would love to see us trade back. Maybe get an extra third out of the deal.
Yea we can trade back about 10 picks a get a good player and an extra pick or picks
I would love it. More picks would be better.
- TAM – OT T.J. Clemmings
- TEN – OT Jake Fisher
- OAK – DE Randy Gregory
- NYG – SS Landon Collins (from JAC)
- NYJ – WR Dorial Green-Beckham
- WAS – OLB Eli Harold
- CHI – DT Eddie Goldman
- JAC – FS Eric Rowe (from NYG)
If not trade back, it's certainly a good round to trade back INto...
Yes, trade back to someone who desperately needs an offensive tackle like Clemmings or Fisher and willing to part with their 3rd rounder. That way Jags could get running back, receiver, safety and linebacker by the top of the 4th round.
Quote:If not trade back, it's certainly a good round to trade back INto...
That's my thinking. Grab our safety at 36, then trade back in for a running back.
Word is Seattle wants to move up to the top of the 2nd.
Quote:Word is Seattle wants to move up to the top of the 2nd.
DGB would be my guess for them. The report also mentioned Atlanta as well. They could be in play for Tevin Coleman.
Quote:
- TAM – OT T.J. Clemmings
- TEN – OT Jake Fisher
- OAK – DE Randy Gregory
- NYG – SS Landon Collins (from JAC)
- NYJ – WR Dorial Green-Beckham
- WAS – OLB Eli Harold
- CHI – DT Eddie Goldman
- JAC – FS Eric Rowe (from NYG)
I don't imagine we'd get much for that. Not sure it's worth the risk if there's a guy they like.
Rumors are swirling on twitter, all of the top teams in round 2 have had calls supposedly from teams wanting their picks. Seahawks, Steelers, others.
Quote:Yea we can trade back about 10 picks a get a good player and an extra pick or picks
Who would want to give up a lot to move up 10 spots? Denver traded three picks and a player to move up only five spots last night. Obviously trading up further would cost a lot more than that.
Quote:Who would want to give up a lot to move up 10 spots? Denver traded three picks and a player to move up only five spots last night. Obviously trading up further would cost a lot more than that.
Not in the second round. Trading up ten spots could cost as little as a couple of late-round picks, maybe a four depending on who's being traded up for and how many teams are calling.
Quote:Who would want to give up a lot to move up 10 spots? Denver traded three picks and a player to move up only five spots last night. Obviously trading up further would cost a lot more than that.
Prices go down in the later rounds. Trading up from 46 to 36 is a lot cheaper than trading up from say 31 to 21.
Quote:Word is Seattle wants to move up to the top of the 2nd.
Source?
I can't believe they want to trade up that far with the second-to-last pick in Round 2.
This topic is meaningless. Caldwell does not know how to trade down.
Quote:This topic is meaningless. Caldwell does not know how to trade down.
Yes he does. He listened to trade down offers before deciding to stay at #3.
Quote:This topic is meaningless. Caldwell does not know how to trade down.
<a class="bbc_url" href='http://espn.go.com/nfl/draft2013/story/_/id/9217877/2013-nfl-draft-philadelphia-eagles-trade-take-trojans-qb-matt-barkley'>http://espn.go.com/nfl/draft2013/story/_/id/9217877/2013-nfl-draft-philadelphia-eagles-trade-take-trojans-qb-matt-barkley</a>