Quote:Absolutely have zero issue with an investigation. It is of my opinion that it's a waste of time. The amount of voter fraud has zero effect on the election and the perpetrators are usually caught and punished accordingly.
Even the Republican controlled Congress isn't buying it.
What you and other liberals don't understand is that it's not about the recent election that is in the past. It's about future elections.
Quote:What you and other liberals don't understand is that it's not about the recent election that is in the past. It's about future elections.
Hmm never been called a liberal before. You know there is more than liberal and conservative correct?
Anyways like I have repeated often. Investigate away. Can't wait to see those results. 3-5 million is laughable.
Afterwords can he initiate an investigation into Bigfoot are the Lovh Ness monster?
Quote:Does it change the results of the election? If not, let's move on. Trump is only doing this because he lost the popular vote and he hates the fact that he did. If he had won the popular vote, I highly doubt he would be doing this.
"Yea, We won the SB but I want an investigation on if there was a hold on 3rd and 15 in the 3rd quarter. It won't change the outcome but I need to know!"
Let's say you are right for this past election. Wouldn't you want things to be 100% correct and verified going forward? Let's clean up the voting process I say. Voter ID for everyone no excuses.
Voter ID laws will be the law of the land before we know it. Contrary to the ridiculous argument by communists, a voter ID would not preclude anyone from voting.
ID is required for too many things in everyday life. So much so that people couldn't survive without a legitimate ID.
It will happen, much to the chagrin of the snowflakes, commies, and whiners nationwide.
Quote:Voter ID laws will be the law of the land before we know it. Contrary to the ridiculous argument by communists, a voter ID would not preclude anyone from voting.
ID is required for too many things in everyday life. So much so that people couldn't survive without a legitimate ID.
It will happen, much to the chagrin of the snowflakes, commies, and whiners nationwide.
So the federal government is going to mandate some sort of ID in your mind?
Still not sure that States will feel required to comply.
But yet he can't release his taxes.
Quote:So the federal government is going to mandate some sort of ID in your mind?
Still not sure that States will feel required to comply.
Like the federal Real ID program and secure driver's licenses? Pretty sure the states will comply.
Quote:But yet he can't release his taxes.
What law mandates that an individual most submit their tax returns to a stranger or strangers? Is there a law that states the POTUS must do so? Is there any information in that return that would change your whining?
Quote:Steve Bannon is registered to vote in two states.
Just saying.
I'm registered to vote in two states though I didn't think about it until today. More people probably are and they don't even realize it. It never occurred to me to let Duval County know I no longer live there regarding voter registration. I should have fallen off the list by now since I've been gone for 5.5 years but apparently that doesn't always happen.
I read an article today regarding Trump going off about people who are registered in more than one state (which isn't illegal by the way, just illegal to actually vote in the two states) and how everyone with dual registration voted more than once and they should be punished. The thing is, his own son-in-law (Kushner) and daughter (Tiffany) are both dual registrants. He because when he married Ivanka he moved to NY and registered to vote there (NJ/NY). Tiffany is/was a student in Pennsylvania and registered there (NY/PA). I just think it's funny that he's railing about these 'law breakers' registered in two states yet some of his family are 'guilty' of what he's saying (the 'law breaking' part, not the voting in two states.)
Quote:Trump argument bolstered: Clinton could have received 800,000 votes from noncitizens, study finds
<a class="bbc_url" href='http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/26/hillary-clinton-received-800000-votes-from-nonciti/'>http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/26/hillary-clinton-received-800000-votes-from-nonciti/</a>
Jesse Richman would like you to stop misinterpreting his research.
<a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wired.com/2017/01/author-trumps-favorite-voter-fraud-study-says-everyones-wrong/amp/?client=safari'>https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wired.com/2017/01/author-trumps-favorite-voter-fraud-study-says-everyones-wrong/amp/?client=safari</a>
Quote:Jesse Richman would like you to stop misinterpreting his research.
<a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wired.com/2017/01/author-trumps-favorite-voter-fraud-study-says-everyones-wrong/amp/?client=safari'>https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wired.com/2017/01/author-trumps-favorite-voter-fraud-study-says-everyones-wrong/amp/?client=safari</a>
Ouch!!! What will Jaguar Worrier do now?
Quote:Jesse Richman would like you to stop misinterpreting his research.
<a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wired.com/2017/01/author-trumps-favorite-voter-fraud-study-says-everyones-wrong/amp/?client=safari'>https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wired.com/2017/01/author-trumps-favorite-voter-fraud-study-says-everyones-wrong/amp/?client=safari</a>
Interesting article, though Richman still says he backs the results of the study. He just doesn't agree with the numbers Trump said (but Richman also doesn't address dual registration or the dead) and the fact his study has been politicized and could lead to federal voting laws.
Sounds like your typical butthurt liberal running to a butthurt leftwing media outlet to whine, honestly.
Quote:Ouch!!! What will Jaguar Worrier do now?
From the article,
"Richman himself is not backing down from his initial findings."
Welp.