04-02-2014, 08:54 PM
Quote:Rashean WAS a ballhawk.
Not for long, but in his prime, he definitely was.
Unlike those HOFers I mentioned with more career INTs that the Attention Dog is conveniently ignoring?
Quote:Rashean WAS a ballhawk.
Not for long, but in his prime, he definitely was.
Quote:Seems like he was drafted to just be a decent starter, someone you can plug in and expect to do a decent job.
A selection based on need last year.
Gus said that Gratz was the only CB left when they picked last year that had a starting grade, so they took him. You first need to field a decent team.
I think guys like McCray were those that were selected on high potential that could also bust realistically. They really seem to like McCray so we'll see if he develops into anything.
What you speak of (playmaking DB) is what I see in LaMarcus Joyner. I want him.
Quote:I'd prefer Pierre Desir.
Quote:in terms of value (for instance, Desir in the 5th vs. Joyner in the 3rd) or flatout you think think Desir is going to be better?
I think Joyner would be awesome value in the 2nd.
Quote:I thought you were talking CB at first, I edited to include a Safety instead.
Joyner is 5' 8". No thanks.
Quote:I thought you were talking CB at first, I edited to include a Safety instead.
Joyner is 5' 8". No thanks.
Quote:Him being 5'8" is the only reason he will drop out of the 1st round. If he drops into the 3rd, I don't care how short he is - you get him.
His change of direction is elite, he hits like a truck, blitzes well, is always around the ball...
Quote:Hey....remember that time you said Rashean Mathis was more of a ball hawk than Ronnie Lott and Deion Sanders...?
Hilarious.
Quote:Sounds like Bob Sanders.....which means, we'll have him for what 2 seasons before the NFL beating takes its toll on that tiny frame and he declines uber early like Sanders....
Quote:from 2004-2007, he was more of a ball hawk than even those guys. As good a "cover" corner? No.
But, keep thinking you're right....
Quote:Sounds like? I'm not judging or anything, I really just want to know. How many times have you seen Joyner play?
It just appears you saw he's listed at 5'8" and instantly thought "nope!"...
Sanders was a bigger hitter than Joyner. Joyner is the better ballhawk. Joyner is the better playmaker IMO.
Quote:God you're embarrassing.
Quote:I don't see a 5"8" DB being a playmaking ball hawk in the National Football League in 2014, sorry. He wasn't even that big of a ball hawk in college.
Quote:we may have different opinions on what a ball hawk is.
doesn't matter, NBD.
Quote:LOL you like Gratz and think the current Jags DB corps is good enough....
Thats more embarrassing.
Quote:Show me where I said that, Tiny Dancer
Quote:Its implied by your defense of Gratz and then comparing his college stats to all time all stars college stats. Thats what you do.I disputed your argument that he will never be a ball hawk. I'm not saying he will, but I sure a hell know that you DON'T know either.
Quote:I disputed your argument that he will never be a ball hawk. I'm not saying he will, but I sure a hell know that you DON'T know either.
You compared his college stats to those of alltime great ball hawk (LOL) Rashean Mathis' college stats.
I then countered by presenting current and future HOFers college numbers with Gratz, to which the compare with favorably.
Embarrassing, Tiny Dancer. Sooooooo Embarrassing.
Just put your tail between your legs and scurry home. Things aren't getting any better for you here.
Quote:I disputed your argument that he will never be a ball hawk. I'm not saying he will, but I sure a hell know that you DON'T know either.
You compared his college stats to those of alltime great ball hawk (LOL) Rashean Mathis' college stats.
I then countered by presenting current and future HOFers college numbers with Gratz, to which the compare with favorably.
Embarrassing, Tiny Dancer. Sooooooo Embarrassing.
Just put your tail between your legs and scurry home. Things aren't getting any better for you here.