Quote:TMD gets banned for stating facts/his opinions...
Do you really believe this?
Quote:Why do Jaguars fans get their panties in a wad when an opponent fan posts on "their" message board?
How I wear my panties is my business.
Quote:Do you really believe this?
Yes.
If I'm wrong (which I very well could be, I don't venture out of the AFC South sub-forum), please prove me otherwise..
AFC south forum would be terrible without the opposing fans. Not sure what's wrong with a bit of light hearted banter between rival teams.
However TMD is a massive troll every offseason. If it is his genuine feelings and opionions he must be really lacking a social life to be so stressed out every year.
I've been here almost 10 years and he's been the same throughout
Quote:AFC south forum would be terrible without the opposing fans. Not sure what's wrong with a bit of light hearted banter between rival teams.
However TMD is a massive troll every offseason. If it is his genuine feelings and opionions he must be really lacking a social life to be so stressed out every year.
I've been here almost 10 years and he's been the same throughout
So that is the reason? That's what I thought... He's being blamed for being a troll, even though lots of his posts have GREAT points (although, some of his points I definitely don't agree with). Yet people like Haterade, who is an obvious troll, is allowed to stay?
EDIT: Also, let's say he genuinely is "lacking a social life to be so stressed out every year" is that
REALLY a reason to ban someone? That's not right. (PS- This post isn't necessarily directed at you, more so to the people who ban him. Unless I'm proven otherwise he deserved to be banned time & time again...)
Quote:So that is the reason? That's what I thought... He's being blamed for being a troll, even though lots of his posts have GREAT points (although, some of his points I definitely don't agree with). Yet people like Haterade, who is an obvious troll, is allowed to stay?
EDIT: Also, let's say he genuinely is "lacking a social life to be so stressed out every year" is that REALLY a reason to ban someone? That's not right. (PS- This post isn't necessarily directed at you, more so to the people who ban him. Unless I'm proven otherwise he deserved to be banned time & time again...)
It wasn't 'trolling' that got him banned. It was multiple warnings for breaking rules in the coc - primarily derailing threads - which was the final offense that put his warnings over the top as far as I could surmise.
For your reading pleasure - here's 10 pages of everything wrong and right with the our resident expert of Jaguar doom and gloom.
http://jungle.jaguars.com/index.php?/top...ned-again/
Quote:Yes.
If I'm wrong (which I very well could be, I don't venture out of the AFC South sub-forum), please prove me otherwise..
Simply because you believe something to be true, doesn't necessarily make it true. Unless you can prove otherwise.
Am I doing this right?
Quote:Simply because you believe something to be true, doesn't necessarily make it true. Unless you can prove otherwise.
Um... LOL. Isn't this exactly why you banned him in the first place?
Or was it because he's derailed topics before? Just like you and I are doing right now. In fact, most of the posts in this thread aren't pertaining to the OP's post.
Seems weak to ban people just because they have strong opinions. And so far, that's the only reason that's been shown to me.
Quote:Um... LOL. Isn't this exactly why you banned him in the first place?
Or was it because he's derailed topics before? Just like you and I are doing right now. In fact, most of the posts in this thread aren't pertaining to the OP's post.
Seems weak to ban people just because they have strong opinions. And so far, that's the only reason that's been shown to me.
His (insane) opinions were fine. It was that in EVERY SINGLE THREAD he turned it into his opinion of the poor quality of the Jags' assistant coaches or the NFL conspiracy against the Jaguars. EVERY SINGLE THREAD.
He gets stuck on a line of thought and can't let it go to the point where he mentions it every time he posts in order to create an argument.
I actually am easier on him than most, but man, it was time he went for a while.
Quote:You're banned.
It would fit the bill if I was...
Quote:It would fit the bill if I was...
But I like you.
I can only ban those I don't like and disagree with.
That's the way you've told me it's supposed to work, right? Apparently you are wiser and know better than the Mods.
Truth is, you don't know the half of it. You'd be surprised if we could share what's discussed behind closed doors, but unfortunately that's something can't do. What happens in Mod Vegas, stays in Mod Vegas.
Quote:But I like you.
I can only ban those I don't like and disagree with.
So... you agree with me then?
Quote:So... you agree with me then?
sar-
chasm
(sär'kăz'əm)
<b>1.</b> (n.) The abyss between the creator of witticisms and the intended recipient who does not find the humor in it.
Cam, Wilson are both better than Luck.... and younger as well.. RG3 will bounce back this year
Quote:I've said this a million times, division games are rarely 'easy'
They may not be
as easy, but being a moderately talented team in the AFC South will win you the division.
You guys played the 2-14 Texans, 4-12 Jags, and the 7-9 Titans... 2 of the top 3 picks... it's a good time to be the Colts. It may not be as easy but it's still easy.
Quote:They may not be as easy, but being a moderately talented team in the AFC South will win you the division.
You guys played the 2-14 Texans, 4-12 Jags, and the 7-9 Titans... 2 of the top 3 picks... it's a good time to be the Colts. It may not be as easy but it's still easy.
Not true...
What else were we supposed to do? We beat all of you. Plus, look at 2012. The Texans went 12-4, the Colts still went 11-5.
Quote:Not true...
What else were we supposed to do? We beat all of you. Plus, look at 2012. The Texans went 12-4, the Colts still went 11-5.
Of course you beat us. I'm not saying you shouldn't--obviously. I'm saying that it wasn't difficult; it was easy.
What about 2012? We were 2-14 and the Titans were 6-10... again... easy. It doesn't matter anyway because we're talking about 2013.
Quote:Of course you beat us. I'm not saying you shouldn't--obviously. I'm saying that it wasn't difficult; it was easy.
What about 2012? We were 2-14 and the Titans were 6-10... again... easy. It doesn't matter anyway because we're talking about 2013.
The argument is silly anyways.
The Colts beat the best teams this year in the NFL.... Obviously showed they could beat anyone.
You never fooled anybody CW. You guys were never really taken serious by the oddsmakers and frankly looked out of your depth in the playoffs.
A lot of improvement needs to happen before you are taken as serious contenders, and your GM tossing draft picks down the toilet probably has killed that.