01-24-2014, 10:55 PM
01-24-2014, 11:45 PM
Quote:What were your assessments?
There's internet access at the city library.
01-24-2014, 11:48 PM
Quote:There's internet access at the city library.
Try again, its a bit more rural
01-25-2014, 12:03 AM
Quote:Try again, its a bit more rural
Well, then look out for those buggies.
01-25-2014, 12:54 AM
<a class="bbc_url" href='http://s1122.photobucket.com/user/jfand/media/Coach_Clips10.png.html'>
</a>
All 22 angle/game film courtesy of nfl.com. Youtube cut ups don't show this view.
![[Image: Coach_Clips10.png]](http://i1122.photobucket.com/albums/l521/jfand/Coach_Clips10.png)
All 22 angle/game film courtesy of nfl.com. Youtube cut ups don't show this view.
01-25-2014, 01:04 AM
Quote:Well, then look out for those buggies.Will try, appreciate the concern
01-25-2014, 01:24 AM
Okay.. this thread has thoroughly abused the "lol" tag. None of you actually laughed audibly. Get over yourselves.
Furthermore, the notion that adding ANY rookie Quarterback will turn this team into a 9 or 10 win team is wholly unrealistic. There are huge holes on both sides of the ball which need to be filled.
Teddy is no more a lock to be a stud QB than Tim Couch or JaMarcus Russell was. Not that he couldn't be a perrenial pro bowler, but if drafting franchise QBs was easy, every team would have one. Go back and look at the last 20 drafts and see how many times the first QB drafted was the best one to come out of the class. I like a lot of things in Teddy's game, but I also saw him underthrow plenty of balls this season, even in his stat explosion vs. Miami, which would have been picked by NFL pros.
In a perfect world, media pundits would also be fired like GMs when they make outlandish claims about can't miss prospects who turn out to be total busts.
Furthermore, the notion that adding ANY rookie Quarterback will turn this team into a 9 or 10 win team is wholly unrealistic. There are huge holes on both sides of the ball which need to be filled.
Teddy is no more a lock to be a stud QB than Tim Couch or JaMarcus Russell was. Not that he couldn't be a perrenial pro bowler, but if drafting franchise QBs was easy, every team would have one. Go back and look at the last 20 drafts and see how many times the first QB drafted was the best one to come out of the class. I like a lot of things in Teddy's game, but I also saw him underthrow plenty of balls this season, even in his stat explosion vs. Miami, which would have been picked by NFL pros.
In a perfect world, media pundits would also be fired like GMs when they make outlandish claims about can't miss prospects who turn out to be total busts.
01-25-2014, 03:21 AM
One of the posters in this thread isn't dealing with a full deck.
01-25-2014, 07:40 AM
Quote:Right after we drafted Gabbert, Cosell was interviewed on one of the local radio stations, and he said the same thing.
Big deal? He never played the game.
It sounds like he was dialed up for On-Demand Blaine-bashing. Whatever!!!!@
01-25-2014, 07:52 AM
Quote:Their cut ups are taken from broadcast footage. There's a difference between cut ups from what we can see on Saturday's and actual game film. Actual game film is broken down from several angles not just the angle ESPN has lol
Teddy is better if we could just see him from a different angle? Compare the scouting reports?
![[Image: dungy2.jpg]](http://images.usatoday.com/sports/_photos/2007/01/29/dungy2.jpg)
Bill Cosby or Tony Dungy?
01-25-2014, 08:09 AM
Quote:10 years and counting???
Seen a lot film on the ol'greats
Play it, live it, love it
I used to sit in my high-chair diagramming Lombardi's greatest plays using Rice Krispies while Bart Starr was running them on TV.
Needless to say, we can all tell the difference between a guy that's made the most of his limited opportunities and a guy that's big because he sand-bagged his way through school.
To the guy that made the most out of what he was offered, may he be accepted into the NFL with open arms. He deserves a break because he's had to fight twice as hard to get recognition.
To the guy that sand-bagged to make himself look bigger than he is, well, he's gotta pay the price.
Time was when the NFL punished guys that sand-bagged. They were detested and were deliberately held back in the draft because sand-bagging is a good old fashioned way of cheating.
01-25-2014, 09:49 AM
Sand bagged? Straw man is full of hay....and still smokes crack.
01-25-2014, 10:10 AM
How long does a poster have to troll around here before they get the banned hammer?
01-25-2014, 11:18 AM
Quote:I want the best player available regardless of position.
When you over-value a player because you think you have a need to address, you're only hurting yourself and your organization. If your draft pick value is twenty and because of a perception of need, you settle for a ten - believing you have filled a need, you've agreed to waste half the value of that asset.
You think you have filled a need, but in reality you burned a pick with a value of twenty for a player scouts agree will never reach a value greater than ten.
Cutting the value of your asset(s) deliberately by making an upside down decision is a very bad business practice.
Blowing off an elite prospect for a lesser talented player at another position makes your organization less talented.
The reason the Jaguars can't reach competitive strength relates directly to the unwillingness to develop a talented roster.
The only way to develop a talented roster is through drafting the most talented football players available with each and every draft pick.
A fool and his picks are soon parted.
But what if you have a huge need at DE and you already have your QB. do you draft the QB who is rated at 8 overall over DE rated 9 overall? Again, this is why your way of thinking is flawed.