I wouldn't say House threw the Jags under the bus. That's a stretch.
(08-02-2017, 10:01 AM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]He was GB's nickel. Left to become a starter and got starter money. Wasn't that good as a starter, OK one year bad the next (scheme didn't change from one year to the next iirc) and now is back in Green Bay because they were desperate.
Exactly right !!
We took another teams 3rd best DB and turned him into our #1 DB. That strategy partly contributed to us sucking so bad for so long.
(08-02-2017, 03:04 AM)Jags02 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-02-2017, 12:11 AM)Tuxedo Wrote: [ -> ]In today's NFL, tight ends can function without blocking just fine, ha.
Marcedes explained it when it said, to paraphrase... those aren't TEs, they're WRs being paid like TEs.
FTFY
or for him.. lol
He's admitting he's not good in zone coverage. Not all defenses can be suited to fit one player.
I've updated the title for ya'll
(08-02-2017, 12:16 PM)knarnn Wrote: [ -> ]I've updated the title for ya'll
That title sounds reasonable and accurate. I know what you were trying to say with the first title, but it just seemed a bit excessive.
No biggie.
(08-02-2017, 11:52 AM)UCF Knight Wrote: [ -> ]He's admitting he's not good in zone coverage. Not all defenses can be suited to fit one player.
Now if he can only get to Step 2 in the recovery process.....
Why are all of you experts on a team website and not scouting and coaching in the NFL?
did no one else catch that part of "If you say I was A in man to man, i would say i was a C MINUS, PLUS in zone? [BLEEP] IS A C-+
(08-02-2017, 08:22 PM)archer56 Wrote: [ -> ]did no one else catch that part of "If you say I was A in man to man, i would say i was a C MINUS, PLUS in zone? [BLEEP] IS A C-+
It just formatted weird on the transcript. It should show C-plus, the written out version of C+.
(08-02-2017, 08:22 PM)archer56 Wrote: [ -> ]did no one else catch that part of "If you say I was A in man to man, i would say i was a C MINUS, PLUS in zone? [BLEEP] IS A C-+
Yeah. That's a hyphen. Not a "minus." Like empty was saying.
(08-02-2017, 03:04 AM)Jags02 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-02-2017, 12:11 AM)Tuxedo Wrote: [ -> ]In today's NFL, tight ends can function without blocking just fine, ha.
Marcedes explained it when it said, to paraphrase... those aren't TEs, they're WRs claiming to be TEs.
Is Lewis an OL claiming to be a TE?