Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: DeShaun Watson
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3
(09-12-2017, 07:40 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-12-2017, 02:57 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]Mahomes was gone when they traded up for Watson.  But I am glad they didn't get Hahomes too

Ah, right. Thank you. Forgot the chefs traded up to get PM at ten. Thought it was late first round for some reason.

The Chiefs did have a late first and traded up from there.
(09-14-2017, 11:40 AM)SDM Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-14-2017, 10:30 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]The tinhorns pulled a more accurate passer with little mobility for a kid that can at least run for his life from behind a joke of an O-Line that was getting torched.
Yes, that OL is a complete joke. Which is why I think #Sacksonville should slow their roll a bit until they see what happens against a competent OL.
No one is saying the Texans OL is worldbeaters but they probably won't give up even close to 10 sacks again this season. 10 sacks is ridiculously rare no matter who you are going against. We're not getting hyped because we sacked a QB 3 times here, it's 10...
(09-14-2017, 12:31 PM)JNev Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-14-2017, 11:40 AM)SDM Wrote: [ -> ]Yes, that OL is a complete joke.  Which is why I think #Sacksonville should slow their roll a bit until they see what happens against a competent OL.
No one is saying the Texans OL is worldbeaters but they probably won't give up even close to 10 sacks again this season. 10 sacks is ridiculously rare no matter who you are going against. We're not getting hyped because we sacked a QB 3 times here, it's 10...

Exactly. Even the worst OL does not give up 10 sacks with a decent QB behind it.
(09-14-2017, 12:31 PM)JNev Wrote: [ -> ]No one is saying the Texans OL is worldbeaters but they probably won't give up even close to 10 sacks again this season. 10 sacks is ridiculously rare no matter who you are going against. We're not getting hyped because we sacked a QB 3 times here, it's 10...
No doubt it's impressive either way. I just find the whole Sacksonville thing kinda funny one week into the season.
(09-14-2017, 12:51 PM)SDM Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-14-2017, 12:31 PM)JNev Wrote: [ -> ]No one is saying the Texans OL is worldbeaters but they probably won't give up even close to 10 sacks again this season. 10 sacks is ridiculously rare no matter who you are going against. We're not getting hyped because we sacked a QB 3 times here, it's 10...
No doubt it's impressive either way.  I just find the whole Sacksonville thing kinda funny one week into the season.

Sacksonville started before this season really...
2015 might have been the first time I remember seeing it...

What seems funny to me is when people talk like their team won last week
even though they lost  Cool
(09-14-2017, 11:40 AM)SDM Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-14-2017, 10:30 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]The tinhorns pulled a more accurate passer with little mobility for a kid that can at least run for his life from behind a joke of an O-Line that was getting torched.
Yes, that OL is a complete joke.  Which is why I think #Sacksonville should slow their roll a bit until they see what happens against a competent OL.

3 sacks before the addition of Campbell. We'll see how it goes this year. I'd say probably around 3-4 is about right though.
(09-14-2017, 11:40 AM)SDM Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-14-2017, 10:30 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]The tinhorns pulled a more accurate passer with little mobility for a kid that can at least run for his life from behind a joke of an O-Line that was getting torched.
Yes, that OL is a complete joke.  Which is why I think #Sacksonville should slow their roll a bit until they see what happens against a competent OL.

This actually is what most Jags fans are saying to each other.  "Let's see what they do in week two." 
 But they're still going to enjoy putting ten sacks on a division rival for a few days nonetheless.
(09-14-2017, 12:58 PM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]What seems funny to me is when people talk like their team won last week
even though they lost  Cool
Once again you fail to make any sense whatsoever.

Yes your team won last week and we lost. You beat a team that I'd be willing to bet is going to be picking in the top 10 in the draft. We lost to a team that went 12-4 last year and is widely considered a legit Super Bowl contender. Wow. Congratulations I guess.

I get it. You guys gotta celebrate when and where you can. Have at it.
(09-14-2017, 02:01 PM)SDM Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-14-2017, 12:58 PM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]What seems funny to me is when people talk like their team won last week
even though they lost  Cool
Once again you fail to make any sense whatsoever.  

Yes your team won last week and we lost.  You beat a team that I'd be willing to bet is going to be picking in the top 10 in the draft.  We lost to a team that went 12-4 last year and is widely considered a legit Super Bowl contender.  Wow.  Congratulations I guess.  

I get it.  You guys gotta celebrate when and where you can.  Have at it.
I make perfect sense...
You're beating your teams drum like losing to Oakland is OK but winning VS the tinhorns (A team a lot of people talked up with stability at QB and the league's #1 D) is nothing.
I'm saying it's something. But we didn't just win. We dominated.
And you guys had a hard fought loss.
But your smack talk is that of a person who isn't worried about losing... yet you JUST lost... to a team that doesn't have as good a defense as Sacksonville.
You don't have to believe the DL is going to get double digit sacks every week to know the talent is there at every level.
From Yannick, to Calais, to Malik, to Jack and Smith, to Ramsey, Bouye, Church and Gipson....

It isn't from one game... it's a large amount of talent acquired over a couple of seasons that we're seeing come to fruition under decent coaching.
And you're scared that the media darling Mary-led tacks are gonna get beat by the Jagwads.

You'll be missed when you disappear after Sunday.
(09-14-2017, 01:40 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-14-2017, 11:40 AM)SDM Wrote: [ -> ]Yes, that OL is a complete joke. Which is why I think #Sacksonville should slow their roll a bit until they see what happens against a competent OL.

This actually is what most Jags fans are saying to each other. "Let's see what they do in week two." 
But they're still going to enjoy putting ten sacks on a division rival for a few days nonetheless

You know what NFL teams always say. They are only focused on what they have to do to win next week. Fans should think the same way knowing the Titans are not the Texans and the Ravens are not like either of them. But when we get ready to ost the Texans, it will be fun to think again about sacking their QBs a total of 10 times.

(09-14-2017, 02:01 PM)SDM Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-14-2017, 12:58 PM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]What seems funny to me is when people talk like their team won last week even though they lost.

Once again you fail to make any sense whatsoever.  

Yes your team won last week and we lost. You beat a team that I'd be willing to bet is going to be picking in the top 10 in the draft. We lost to a team that went 12-4 last year and is widely considered a legit Super Bowl contender. Wow. Congratulations I guess.  

I get it.  You guys gotta celebrate when and where you can.  Have at it.

You are the one who makes no sense. If you lose, you lose, so it is crazy to call that game a win no matter who your opponent is. And face it, that loss was worse than the score.
(09-14-2017, 02:16 PM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]I make perfect sense...
You're beating your teams drum like losing to Oakland is OK but winning VS the tinhorns (A team a lot of people talked up with stability at QB and the league's #1 D) is nothing.
I'm saying it's something. But we didn't just win. We dominated.
And you guys had a hard fought loss.
But your smack talk is that of a person who isn't worried about losing... yet you JUST lost... to a team that doesn't have as good a defense as Sacksonville.
You don't have to believe the DL is going to get double digit sacks every week to know the talent is there at every level.
From Yannick, to Calais, to Malik, to Jack and Smith, to Ramsey, Bouye, Church and Gipson....

It isn't from one game... it's a large amount of talent acquired over a couple of seasons that we're seeing come to fruition under decent coaching.
And you're scared that the media darling Mary-led tacks are gonna get beat by the Jagwads.

You'll be missed when you disappear after Sunday.
Again with the making stuff up lol. Not sure where I've been "beating my team's drum." I've been more pessimistic about this team than 95% of other Titan fans. For the fiftieth time, I just find it funny how hyped you guys are after one game against a bad team. Talk about low expectations.

I'll be back on Sunday, win or lose. I have no reason not to. It's not like I'm over here guaranteeing victory or anything.

(09-14-2017, 02:24 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]You are the one who makes no sense. If you lose, you lose, so it is crazy to call that game a win no matter who your opponent is. And face it, that loss was worse than the score.
Where did I call, or even imply, it was a win? All I'm saying is we lost to a good team and you beat a bad team. So it's not as simple as "we won, you lost, therefore we are better."
(09-14-2017, 02:49 PM)SDM Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-14-2017, 02:16 PM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]I make perfect sense...
You're beating your teams drum like losing to Oakland is OK but winning VS the tinhorns (A team a lot of people talked up with stability at QB and the league's #1 D) is nothing.
I'm saying it's something. But we didn't just win. We dominated.
And you guys had a hard fought loss.
But your smack talk is that of a person who isn't worried about losing... yet you JUST lost... to a team that doesn't have as good a defense as Sacksonville.
You don't have to believe the DL is going to get double digit sacks every week to know the talent is there at every level.
From Yannick, to Calais, to Malik, to Jack and Smith, to Ramsey, Bouye, Church and Gipson....

It isn't from one game... it's a large amount of talent acquired over a couple of seasons that we're seeing come to fruition under decent coaching.
And you're scared that the media darling Mary-led tacks are gonna get beat by the Jagwads.

You'll be missed when you disappear after Sunday.
Again with the making stuff up lol.  Not sure where I've been "beating my team's drum."  I've been more pessimistic about this team than 95% of other Titan fans.  For the fiftieth time, I just find it funny how hyped you guys are after one game against a bad team.  Talk about low expectations.  

I'll be back on Sunday, win or lose.   I have no reason not to.  It's not like I'm over here guaranteeing victory or anything.

(09-14-2017, 02:24 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]You are the one who makes no sense. If you lose, you lose, so it is crazy to call that game a win no matter who your opponent is. And face it, that loss was worse than the score.
Where did I call, or even imply, it was a win?  All I'm saying is we lost to a good team and you beat a bad team.  So it's not as simple as "we won, you lost, therefore we are better."

Check the standings.
Also... Houston wasn't a horrible team until they got beat by the Jags... now all a sudden they are horrible.

They won the division last year...
Had Watt back healthy with Clowney and Mercilus...
Still had ol Nuke Hopkins....
blah blah blah

One missing OT and now they are trash?


K.
(09-14-2017, 02:59 PM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]Check the standings.
Also... Houston wasn't a horrible team until they got beat by the Jags... now all a sudden they are horrible.

They won the division last year...
Had Watt back healthy with Clowney and Mercilus...
Still had ol Nuke Hopkins....
blah blah blah

One missing OT and now they are trash?


K.

Personally (if I were a Texans fan) I'd rather have the roided up JJ Watt playing on a broken leg than to have a non-juiced up Watt attempting to make an impact.
If J.J. Watt had a broken leg he would be on IR again.
(09-15-2017, 04:37 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]If J.J. Watt had a broken leg he would be on IR again.

Whoosh!
Pages: 1 2 3