Already guaranteed another sub .500 week...and my Jags lost a winnable game.
Shaking my head in dismay.
Edit: Seattle beats Colts...as expected.
This week: 1-2
Overall: 5-8
(09-27-2017, 10:30 PM)KodiakJag Wrote: [ -> ]Jaguars over Jets - Jacksonville has already got their bad game out of the way
Texans over Titans - Tennessee is due for a bad game, and Texans look a lot better than when we faced them
Seahawks over Colts - Hard to pick the Colts over most other teams in the league
Last week 4-0
Overall 6-4
Oh well...thx Jags
2-1 this week
8-5 overall
(09-28-2017, 02:36 PM)Perkolater Wrote: [ -> ]Jags
Titans (sigh)
Hawks.
3-1 last week
6-4 overall
Well crap,
1-2 this week
7-6 overall
(09-27-2017, 09:00 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]This week's picks.
Jaguars - This game has me a bit worried, but I think it's a should win. The two biggest factors is playing the game more disciplined with no turnovers and limiting the costly penalties.
Titans - While I would rather see the Texans win this one, I just think that the Titans are the better team.
Seahawks - The Colts are a mess right now and traveling to the West coast is never an easy thing, especially to that stadium.
Last week 3-1
Overall 6-4
Sigh...
1-2 This Week
7-6 Overall
Damn, the NFL is all over the place this year. No consistency, except the clots!
1-2 this week
7-6 overall
Looking at the schedules the next few weeks i see the TITANS entering their bye week at 5-2, the texans 4-3 and the jags 3-4. Thoughts?
(10-02-2017, 09:37 AM)Jeff.Fisher Wrote: [ -> ]Looking at the schedules the next few weeks i see the TITANS entering their bye week at 5-2, the texans 4-3 and the jags 3-4. Thoughts?
What's the status of MM?
(09-28-2017, 01:03 AM)snowwolf776 Wrote: [ -> ]3-1 last week. 6-1 overall.
I'm going to go with
Seahawks
Texans
Jags
2-1 this week. 5-2 overall. not to bad.
(09-28-2017, 01:03 AM)snowwolf776 Wrote: [ -> ]3-1 last week. 6-1 overall.
I'm going to go with
Seahawks
Texans
Jags
2-1 this week. 5-2 overall. not to bad.
(09-28-2017, 10:43 AM)unf_nashvillian Wrote: [ -> ]Jets over Jaguars
Titans over Texans
Seahawks over Colts
4-0 last week
8-2 overall
2-1 this week
10-3 overall
Man, we looked like [BLEEP] this weekend lol. I think we all need to resign ourselves to the fact that the entire AFCS is a [BLEEP] show.
Even if I don't post in this type of thread I count my picks. They were the Jaguars, Titans, and Seahawks, so I went 1-2 this week and am 7-6 overall.
8-5 now after going 2-1...If only, Jags.
(10-01-2017, 12:59 PM)Psychop1 Wrote: [ -> ]Jags
Titans
Seahawks
1-2 for the week
4-6 overall
(10-02-2017, 10:27 AM)jradMITEX Wrote: [ -> ] (10-02-2017, 09:37 AM)Jeff.Fisher Wrote: [ -> ]Looking at the schedules the next few weeks i see the TITANS entering their bye week at 5-2, the texans 4-3 and the jags 3-4. Thoughts?
What's the status of MM?
Don’t really know. I had the feeling he would have played if the game was close. I don’t think the coaching staff wanted him to really get hurt in a game we couldn’t win. I haven’t seen anything to make me think different so far but we will see.
(09-28-2017, 04:26 PM)imtheblkranger Wrote: [ -> ]Going to go
Jags
tacks
Hawks
Hoping for a Hou win though.
2-2 last week
6-4 overall
Well that didn't go as planned
1-2 this week
7-6 overall
(10-02-2017, 10:59 AM)unf_nashvillian Wrote: [ -> ]2-1 this week
10-3 overall
Man, we looked like [BLEEP] this weekend lol. I think we all need to resign ourselves to the fact that the entire AFCS is a [BLEEP] show.
Speak for yourself, we went 9-7 last year with no QB...we have one now.
(09-27-2017, 11:47 PM)JagsFanSince95 Wrote: [ -> ]Jaguars should handle their business and beat the Jets in a low scoring game. 17-9
Tacks will beat the Texans, but I want Houston to win bad. 24-10 Tennessee.
Colts should lose to Seattle, Hawks O looks bad though. 20-13 Seattle.
2-1 last week *forgot to post Indy over Browns
4-3 Overall. - Missed week 1.
1-2. Thanks Jaguars
Thanks Watson, no really thanks I enjoyed that beat down of the tacks..
5-5 Overall.
(10-02-2017, 08:27 PM)Psychop1 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-02-2017, 10:27 AM)jradMITEX Wrote: [ -> ]What's the status of MM?
Don’t really know. I had the feeling he would have played if the game was close. I don’t think the coaching staff wanted him to really get hurt in a game we couldn’t win. I haven’t seen anything to make me think different so far but we will see.
I have never heard of a player returning to the game with a hamstring injury. It always knocks players out for a few weeks. If it was just a cramp, they would have let him back in no matter what.
(10-02-2017, 09:36 PM)TurndownforWatt Wrote: [ -> ]Speak for yourself, we went 9-7 last year with no QB...we have one now.
Nonsense. You obviously had a QB.
(10-03-2017, 12:56 AM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-02-2017, 09:36 PM)TurndownforWatt Wrote: [ -> ]Speak for yourself, we went 9-7 last year with no QB...we have one now.
Nonsense. You obviously had a QB.
Deshaun Watson has shown the potential to be great..a true franchise QB. That's all Houston needed. What's scary is they still have a all pro LT and Cushing returning later. In his first start against the Bengals we could only dress 3 WRs and didn't have any TEs because everyone was out and the kid still found a way to make enough plays to win.(also balled out in New England..should've won that game but oh well) Now Fuller is back and in his first game back Watson hit him for 2 TDs and the TE Griffen for another..
Now we have a guy who is a real playmaker and can actually carry a offense like a franchise QB..we've never really had that before. Schaub was really good though for a stretch..I'll give him that.
If Watson stays healthy, Houston is going to win this division and be a tough out in the playoffs. The guy is special..and I know y'all think I'm a homer saying that, but I'm not, he's mature beyond his years. He "gets it" and the game is not too fast for him at all.
Turndcown, do you accept PMs? I am willing to discuss the issue privately but not in a thread.
(10-03-2017, 09:54 AM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]Turndcown, do you accept PMs? I am willing to discuss the issue privately but not in a thread.
Sure I do..what's up