(10-13-2017, 11:55 PM)SamusAranX Wrote: [ -> ] (10-13-2017, 11:31 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]Didn't Blake throw more than 20 passes against the Ravens?
That was what we call a fluke.
Not if Hackett told him to threw less than 20 times. We spent too much time on offense for me to imagine he attempted less than 20 passes.
(10-14-2017, 12:01 AM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ] (10-13-2017, 11:55 PM)SamusAranX Wrote: [ -> ]That was what we call a fluke.
Not if Hackett told him to threw less than 20 times. We spent too much time on offense for me to imagine he attempted less than 20 passes.
It was a fluke that Bortles had that kind of performance. The exception to the rule. It’s not going to happen often, if at all.
(10-13-2017, 08:06 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ] (10-13-2017, 08:05 PM)Caldrac Wrote: [ -> ]This is why I predicted Koyack gets a TD. I think they'll try to attack the Rams like they did the Ravens and they'll attempt to work in the TE's a lot more. They've been quiet the last few weeks. It's time to get them involved.
O'Shaugnessey is more likely to score than Koyack.
Doubt it. He cost us an INT in Pittsburgh. He's not exactly sure handed either. He's dropped a few here and there over the last two weeks.
(10-14-2017, 10:35 AM)Caldrac Wrote: [ -> ] (10-13-2017, 08:06 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]O'Shaugnessey is more likely to score than Koyack.
Doubt it. He cost us an INT in Pittsburgh. He's not exactly sure handed either. He's dropped a few here and there over the last two weeks.
He was sure-handed in both division games. The interception was a bad call. I reserve judgment until the season is over, but so far am glad we signed him.
(10-14-2017, 11:27 AM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2017, 10:35 AM)Caldrac Wrote: [ -> ]Doubt it. He cost us an INT in Pittsburgh. He's not exactly sure handed either. He's dropped a few here and there over the last two weeks.
He was sure-handed in both division games. The interception was a bad call. I reserve judgment until the season is over, but so far am glad we signed him.
I agree. He has a lot of potential. He looks the part. Hopefully we can improve in the passing game. But I feel like they need to try and replicate the attack they put on the Ravens with the tight end position against the Rams tomorrow.
(10-14-2017, 11:33 AM)Caldrac Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2017, 11:27 AM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]He was sure-handed in both division games. The interception was a bad call. I reserve judgment until the season is over, but so far am glad we signed him.
I agree. He has a lot of potential. He looks the part. Hopefully we can improve in the passing game. But I feel like they need to try and replicate the attack they put on the Ravens with the tight end position against the Rams tomorrow.
How good are the Rams against tight ends?
(10-14-2017, 11:55 AM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2017, 11:33 AM)Caldrac Wrote: [ -> ]I agree. He has a lot of potential. He looks the part. Hopefully we can improve in the passing game. But I feel like they need to try and replicate the attack they put on the Ravens with the tight end position against the Rams tomorrow.
How good are the Rams against tight ends?
Looking at my fantasy football league stats, shows they are 15th in the league against TE this year. So roughly middle of the pack. Not great, not awful.
I literally have no idea what to expect at Everbank tomorrow .
(10-14-2017, 12:11 PM)burt1jason Wrote: [ -> ]I literally have no idea what to expect at Everbank tomorrow .
Which section are you in?
Expect to see giant scoreboards, cheerleaders, Jaxson de Ville, and too many empty seats.
(10-14-2017, 12:18 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2017, 12:11 PM)burt1jason Wrote: [ -> ]I literally have no idea what to expect at Everbank tomorrow .
Which section are you in?
Expect to see giant scoreboards, cheerleaders, Jaxson de Ville, and too many empty seats.
I’m pretty sure, it’s comments like these that make that red number bigger.
(10-14-2017, 12:28 PM)Jags Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2017, 12:18 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]Which section are you in?
Expect to see giant scoreboards, cheerleaders, Jaxson de Ville, and too many empty seats.
I’m pretty sure, it’s comments like these that make that red number bigger.
Actually the red number is
smaller because of the negative symbol. But I get it.
There are many reasons for it and you can figure it out by clicking on the red number. I will not discuss specifics in a thread.