(11-06-2017, 04:53 PM)MalabarJag Wrote: [ -> ] (11-06-2017, 03:53 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]The dog story is patently false, and there were jabs here and there about Obama golfing, most parroting Trump's hypocritical criticism. But you see what you want to see, right?
1. Even the far-Left Snopes admits that the dog flew separately from the rest of the family on a vacation trip. They excuse it by saying that the dog flew with other support staff, but claiming it was "patently false" is patently false.
2. Whatever you believe about the dog story, my statement was that that was a point of discussion. A story does not have to be true to be discussed. So ...
3. about the golfing, maybe you have a link?
The patently false part was the "solo trip", scheduled just for the dog, which was the crux of the criticism. An outright lie is not a point of discussion, anyone not checking out that story doesn't really need to be lent an ear.
Ok, you got me, I'm not going to the old boards to dig up quotes about Obama. I remember them, you don't, fair enough. Are you naive enough to think the avid Trumpettes here never parroted their Emperor, who damn sure did talk about Obama golfing.
(11-06-2017, 04:02 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-06-2017, 03:53 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]The dog story is patently false, and there were jabs here and there about Obama golfing, most parroting Trump's hypocritical criticism. But you see what you want to see, right?
Trump is better at everything than Obama, including golf. Watch his shots from yesterday with Abe and Hideki. Pure.
When you spend as much time on the course as Trump, you should be good.
(11-06-2017, 05:46 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ] (11-06-2017, 04:02 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Trump is better at everything than Obama, including golf. Watch his shots from yesterday with Abe and Hideki. Pure.
When you spend as much time on the course as Trump, you should be good.
You would think, but golf is a brutal game. Practice doesn't always make perfect.
(11-06-2017, 05:50 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-06-2017, 05:46 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]When you spend as much time on the course as Trump, you should be good.
You would think, but golf is a brutal game. Practice doesn't always make perfect.
Who said anything about perfect? Practice makes you better.
Either way, being a good golfer means one thing - you are a good golfer. Ask Tiger Woods.
(11-06-2017, 04:24 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-06-2017, 04:21 PM)copycat Wrote: [ -> ]Yup, he is far better at wasting taxpayers money on a golf coarse than Obama ever dreamed.
Amazing how fiscally responsible people become when Trump is in the White House.
I was no different when Obama was in office. I am however calling out Trump since he was all over Barry on multiple occasions for golfing too much. Hypocrisy is hypocrisy and it stinks from both sides of the isle.
Ok, since nobody else asked, I'll have to. Maybe this should go in the "Questions You Always Wondered About, But Were Afraid To Ask" thread, but here it goes anyway.
Does Brazile have a Brazillian?

(11-07-2017, 06:02 PM)Dakota Wrote: [ -> ]Ok, since nobody else asked, I'll have to. Maybe this should go in the "Questions You Always Wondered About, But Were Afraid To Ask" thread, but here it goes anyway.
Does Brazile have a Brazillian? 
How much a is Brazillian?
(11-07-2017, 10:25 PM)TheBigDawg Wrote: [ -> ] (11-07-2017, 06:02 PM)Dakota Wrote: [ -> ]Ok, since nobody else asked, I'll have to. Maybe this should go in the "Questions You Always Wondered About, But Were Afraid To Ask" thread, but here it goes anyway.
Does Brazile have a Brazillian? 
How much a is Brazillian?
Depends on the exchange rate?
Has anyone thought about just how BAD a party has to be for someone like Brazile to turn against them??
(11-07-2017, 10:44 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Has anyone thought about just how BAD a party has to be for someone like Brazile to turn against them??
I find both parties equally despicable and corrupt.
I love it when they resort to pointing out golf trips lol
Going back to the ol bag of same ol schtick
Too bad the Republicans didn't rig their primary. We'd be a lot better off today.
(11-07-2017, 10:44 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Has anyone thought about just how BAD a party has to be for someone like Brazile to turn against them??
Has anyone thought about just how BAD a party has to be for someone like Trump win a Presidential Election??
Yes, the Democratic party, with Hillary, Wasserman-Schultz, and Nancy Freaking Pelosi leading the way in 2016 was God-awful
(11-08-2017, 04:23 PM)HURRICANE!!! Wrote: [ -> ] (11-07-2017, 10:44 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Has anyone thought about just how BAD a party has to be for someone like Brazile to turn against them??
Has anyone thought about just how BAD a party has to be for someone like Trump win a Presidential Election??
Yes, the Democratic party, with Hillary, Wasserman-Schultz, and Nancy Freaking Pelosi leading the way in 2016 was God-awful
It wasn't as much about the GOP being bad as it was Hillary being the worst candidate in US history.
There are a handful of guys that Trump took down that I would be just fine with being president that would have done a good job.
(11-08-2017, 04:35 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-08-2017, 04:23 PM)HURRICANE!!! Wrote: [ -> ]Has anyone thought about just how BAD a party has to be for someone like Trump win a Presidential Election??
Yes, the Democratic party, with Hillary, Wasserman-Schultz, and Nancy Freaking Pelosi leading the way in 2016 was God-awful
It wasn't as much about the GOP being bad as it was Hillary being the worst candidate in US history.
There are a handful of guys that Trump took down that I would be just fine with being president that would have done a good job.
I believe Hillary and Trump were the two worst candidates in U.S. history. Personally, I would've taken
any of the GOP candidates over Trump. Even Cruz and Christie. At least they went in somewhat knowing, what the job would entail. Trump had no clue what he was getting into and he's still clueless.
(11-08-2017, 05:07 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ] (11-08-2017, 04:35 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]It wasn't as much about the GOP being bad as it was Hillary being the worst candidate in US history.
There are a handful of guys that Trump took down that I would be just fine with being president that would have done a good job.
I believe Hillary and Trump were the two worst candidates in U.S. history. Personally, I would've taken any of the GOP candidates over Trump. Even Cruz and Christie. At least they went in somewhat knowing, what the job would entail. Trump had no clue what he was getting into and he's still clueless.
The economy disagrees with you.
(11-08-2017, 05:11 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-08-2017, 05:07 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]I believe Hillary and Trump were the two worst candidates in U.S. history. Personally, I would've taken any of the GOP candidates over Trump. Even Cruz and Christie. At least they went in somewhat knowing, what the job would entail. Trump had no clue what he was getting into and he's still clueless.
The economy disagrees with you.
It's hard for libtards to understand what the economy is as their welfare check has dwindled. To them, that means a bad economy...lol.
(11-08-2017, 05:11 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-08-2017, 05:07 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]I believe Hillary and Trump were the two worst candidates in U.S. history. Personally, I would've taken any of the GOP candidates over Trump. Even Cruz and Christie. At least they went in somewhat knowing, what the job would entail. Trump had no clue what he was getting into and he's still clueless.
The economy disagrees with you.
Rich white guys think the only presidential responsibility is stimulating the economy. Believe it or not, it involves
ALOT more. Being able to only complete one mere task at a job that entails thousands of tasks should still get you fired.