11-15-2017, 02:00 PM
(11-15-2017, 01:44 PM)irontrooper83 Wrote: [ -> ](11-15-2017, 01:40 PM)Byron LeftTown Wrote: [ -> ]There's one replay angle on the Gipson fumble recovery that clearly shows Gipson was bobbling the ball as he got up.
There is no replay that shows Gipson touching a Charger with clear possession of the ball. The refs did not see it and the replays did not show it, so how could they reverse the call? Even if it was likely or logical that Gipson was touching the player as he gained possession, at what point did he stop touching the player and at what point did he actually have possession? There was no basis to overturn it.
Marrone said that the call to reverse it came from New York where apparently the puzzled together different images and replays and decide to overturn it.
The replay has gotten worse since they go to NY for a lot of calls now....
Sometimes they overturn stuff that shouldn't be... sometimes they allow stuff that clearly shouldn't....
Insane... the harder they try the worse they do it seems....
Also... isn't this supposed to be the first year we have some "full time" refs?
These dudes sorry lol