Hillary rolled doubles 3 times lock her up!
This Order having been enacted by other presidents, but trump has this one finely tuned to put the shackles on Hillary
Buy the way she has an injured right ankle is it hiding an ankle bracket to track her movement
(12-29-2017, 03:49 PM)13Coronas Wrote: [ -> ]Hillary rolled doubles 3 times lock her up!
This Order having been enacted by other presidents, but trump has this one finely tuned to put the shackles on Hillary
Buy the way she has an injured right ankle is it hiding an ankle bracket to track her movement
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-...orruption/
I thought this is what the OFAC list was for?
Yes the OFAC are the ones that will do this
But the Executive order points to
B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in
Ie Hillary
(12-29-2017, 03:49 PM)13Coronas Wrote: [ -> ]This Order having been enacted by other presidents, but trump has this one finely tuned to put the shackles on Hillary
Good luck putting shackles on those cankles.
(12-29-2017, 03:49 PM)13Coronas Wrote: [ -> ]Hillary rolled doubles 3 times lock her up!
This Order having been enacted by other presidents, but trump has this one finely tuned to put the shackles on Hillary
Buy the way she has an injured right ankle is it hiding an ankle bracket to track her movement
Here ya go
https://www.care.com/writing-tutors/jacksonville-fl
(12-29-2017, 05:08 PM)13Coronas Wrote: [ -> ]Yes the OFAC are the ones that will do this
But the Executive order points to
B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in
Ie Hillary
Trump has jack [BLEEP] nothing to gain by going after Hillary at this point. His 32% would chant in the streets about it, but the other 68% of the country would tell him to get a [BLEEP] life, and if the GOP badly underperforms in the 2018 elections because he grandstands to fail miserably in an attempt to put an old political foe behind bars, he just might find himself with lots and lots of free time on his hands.
Also, using the justice system to systematically target political opponents is pushing the boundaries of yet another impeachable offense.
(12-29-2017, 07:38 PM)TJBender Wrote: [ -> ] (12-29-2017, 05:08 PM)13Coronas Wrote: [ -> ]Yes the OFAC are the ones that will do this
But the Executive order points to
B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in
Ie Hillary
Trump has jack [BLEEP] nothing to gain by going after Hillary at this point. His 32% would chant in the streets about it, but the other 68% of the country would tell him to get a [BLEEP] life, and if the GOP badly underperforms in the 2018 elections because he grandstands to fail miserably in an attempt to put an old political foe behind bars, he just might find himself with lots and lots of free time on his hands.
Also, using the justice system to systematically target political opponents is pushing the boundaries of yet another impeachable offense.
If they have evidence of crimes by the previous administration and do nothing then you would deride them for that.
(12-29-2017, 07:47 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (12-29-2017, 07:38 PM)TJBender Wrote: [ -> ]Trump has jack [BLEEP] nothing to gain by going after Hillary at this point. His 32% would chant in the streets about it, but the other 68% of the country would tell him to get a [BLEEP] life, and if the GOP badly underperforms in the 2018 elections because he grandstands to fail miserably in an attempt to put an old political foe behind bars, he just might find himself with lots and lots of free time on his hands.
Also, using the justice system to systematically target political opponents is pushing the boundaries of yet another impeachable offense.
If they have evidence of crimes by the previous administration and do nothing then you would deride them for that.
Personally? Yes.
Politically? Trump has nothing to gain by going after a miserable old woman. Dredging that back up wouldn't add anyone to the 32% of the country that still licks the turd from his boots, but it would further alienate the smaller and smaller block of voters in the center that are inclined to support Republicans in 2018. If he tries to manufacture a Hillary Clinton show trial at this point, she'll be wrongfully exonerated and he'll be laughed out of office for killing the GOP.
(12-29-2017, 07:38 PM)TJBender Wrote: [ -> ]Also, using the justice system to systematically target political opponents is pushing the boundaries of yet another impeachable offense.
You're probably right that he doesn't have much to gain from it, but the amount of corruption and criminal behavior from Clinton shouldn't go investigated. He should do it for no other reason than to show that no one is above the law.
Also, in no way whatsoever is going after a criminal like Clinton even close to being an impeachable offense. Just because she's a political opponent, it doesn't give her impunity under the guise that he's "systematically targeting political opponents". There's actually legitimate evidence showing Clinton has committed crimes. It's the FBI's job to pursue these investigation, and there's reasons to believe that they intentionally mishandled that investigation.
What do you mean, iam confused
“Clinton shouldn’t go Investigated.”
Returned critique slap
“Comey chose to avoid a “massive (bad word removed )storm,” as the agent said, that would’ve resulted from exposing the entire globalist power structure.”
Trey Gowdy sums it up saying that it’s a whole lot worse than we ever imagined.
What do you think?
I say
Cry havoc Let loose the dogs of war
Lock her up
(12-29-2017, 04:00 PM)13Coronas Wrote: [ -> ] (12-29-2017, 03:49 PM)13Coronas Wrote: [ -> ]Hillary rolled doubles 3 times lock her up!
This Order having been enacted by other presidents, but trump has this one finely tuned to put the shackles on Hillary
Buy the way she has an injured right ankle is it hiding an ankle bracket to track her movement
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-...orruption/
Did you actually read this? It doesn't seem to apply to US citizens, only foreigners.
Sorry I have to cut and paste the part you didn’t take the time to read and accused me of not reading
(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:
(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery
It’s for real Trump armed this rocket at Crooked Hillary
(12-30-2017, 03:34 PM)13Coronas Wrote: [ -> ]Sorry I have to cut and paste the part you didn’t take the time to read and accused me of not reading
(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:
(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery
(ii)
any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:
(A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;
(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:
(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or
You see the part in bold? The parts you cited are underneath the part in bold. Section (ii). This applies to foreigners. Not to Hillary Clinton.
(12-30-2017, 06:52 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ] (12-30-2017, 03:34 PM)13Coronas Wrote: [ -> ]Sorry I have to cut and paste the part you didn’t take the time to read and accused me of not reading
(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:
(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery
(ii) any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:
(A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;
(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:
(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or
You see the part in bold? The parts you cited are underneath the part in bold. Section (ii). This applies to foreigners. Not to Hillary Clinton.
Yep. Nothing has changed. Hillary is still above the law.
(12-30-2017, 08:26 PM)MalabarJag Wrote: [ -> ] (12-30-2017, 06:52 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ](ii) any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:
(A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;
(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:
(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or
You see the part in bold? The parts you cited are underneath the part in bold. Section (ii). This applies to foreigners. Not to Hillary Clinton.
Yep. Nothing has changed. Hillary is still above the law.
Is that better of worse than Donald - who wants to
be the law?