Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Trump Declares National Emergency: Assets Blocked

#1

Hillary rolled doubles 3 times lock her up!
This Order having been enacted by other presidents, but trump has  this one finely tuned to put the shackles on Hillary 
Buy the way she has an injured right ankle is it hiding an ankle bracket to track her movement
“You may never know what results come of your actions, but if you do nothing, there will be no results.”
“If you find a way to motivate an idiot you have a motivated idiot”
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

(12-29-2017, 03:49 PM)13Coronas Wrote: Hillary rolled doubles 3 times lock her up!
This Order having been enacted by other presidents, but trump has  this one finely tuned to put the shackles on Hillary 
Buy the way she has an injured right ankle is it hiding an ankle bracket to track her movement

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-...orruption/
“You may never know what results come of your actions, but if you do nothing, there will be no results.”
“If you find a way to motivate an idiot you have a motivated idiot”
Reply

#3

I thought this is what the OFAC list was for?
Reply

#4

Yes the OFAC are the ones that will do this
But the Executive order points to
B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in

Ie Hillary
“You may never know what results come of your actions, but if you do nothing, there will be no results.”
“If you find a way to motivate an idiot you have a motivated idiot”
Reply

#5

(12-29-2017, 03:49 PM)13Coronas Wrote: This Order having been enacted by other presidents, but trump has  this one finely tuned to put the shackles on Hillary 

Good luck putting shackles on those cankles.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

(12-29-2017, 03:49 PM)13Coronas Wrote: Hillary rolled doubles 3 times lock her up!
This Order having been enacted by other presidents, but trump has  this one finely tuned to put the shackles on Hillary 
Buy the way she has an injured right ankle is it hiding an ankle bracket to track her movement

Here ya go

https://www.care.com/writing-tutors/jacksonville-fl
Reply

#7

I don't get it.
Reply

#8

(12-29-2017, 05:08 PM)13Coronas Wrote: Yes the OFAC are the ones that will do this
But the Executive order  points to
B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in

Ie Hillary

Trump has jack [BLEEP] nothing to gain by going after Hillary at this point. His 32% would chant in the streets about it, but the other 68% of the country would tell him to get a [BLEEP] life, and if the GOP badly underperforms in the 2018 elections because he grandstands to fail miserably in an attempt to put an old political foe behind bars, he just might find himself with lots and lots of free time on his hands.

Also, using the justice system to systematically target political opponents is pushing the boundaries of yet another impeachable offense.
Reply

#9

(12-29-2017, 07:38 PM)TJBender Wrote:
(12-29-2017, 05:08 PM)13Coronas Wrote: Yes the OFAC are the ones that will do this
But the Executive order  points to
B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in

Ie Hillary

Trump has jack [BLEEP] nothing to gain by going after Hillary at this point. His 32% would chant in the streets about it, but the other 68% of the country would tell him to get a [BLEEP] life, and if the GOP badly underperforms in the 2018 elections because he grandstands to fail miserably in an attempt to put an old political foe behind bars, he just might find himself with lots and lots of free time on his hands.

Also, using the justice system to systematically target political opponents is pushing the boundaries of yet another impeachable offense.

If they have evidence of crimes by the previous administration and do nothing then you would deride them for that.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

(12-29-2017, 07:47 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:
(12-29-2017, 07:38 PM)TJBender Wrote: Trump has jack [BLEEP] nothing to gain by going after Hillary at this point. His 32% would chant in the streets about it, but the other 68% of the country would tell him to get a [BLEEP] life, and if the GOP badly underperforms in the 2018 elections because he grandstands to fail miserably in an attempt to put an old political foe behind bars, he just might find himself with lots and lots of free time on his hands.

Also, using the justice system to systematically target political opponents is pushing the boundaries of yet another impeachable offense.

If they have evidence of crimes by the previous administration and do nothing then you would deride them for that.

Personally? Yes.

Politically? Trump has nothing to gain by going after a miserable old woman. Dredging that back up wouldn't add anyone to the 32% of the country that still licks the turd from his boots, but it would further alienate the smaller and smaller block of voters in the center that are inclined to support Republicans in 2018. If he tries to manufacture a Hillary Clinton show trial at this point, she'll be wrongfully exonerated and he'll be laughed out of office for killing the GOP.
Reply

#11

(12-29-2017, 07:38 PM)TJBender Wrote: Also, using the justice system to systematically target political opponents is pushing the boundaries of yet another impeachable offense.

You're probably right that he doesn't have much to gain from it, but the amount of corruption and criminal behavior from Clinton shouldn't go investigated. He should do it for no other reason than to show that no one is above the law. 

Also, in no way whatsoever is going after a criminal like Clinton even close to being an impeachable offense. Just because she's a political opponent, it doesn't give her impunity under the guise that he's "systematically targeting political opponents". There's actually legitimate evidence showing Clinton has committed crimes. It's the FBI's job to pursue these investigation, and there's reasons to believe that they intentionally mishandled that investigation.
Reply

#12

What do you mean, iam confused
“Clinton shouldn’t go Investigated.”

Returned critique slap
“You may never know what results come of your actions, but if you do nothing, there will be no results.”
“If you find a way to motivate an idiot you have a motivated idiot”
Reply

#13

“Comey chose to avoid a “massive (bad word removed )storm,” as the agent said, that would’ve resulted from exposing the entire globalist power structure.”

Trey Gowdy sums it up saying that it’s a whole lot worse than we ever imagined.
What do you think?

I say
Cry havoc Let loose the dogs of war

Lock her up
“You may never know what results come of your actions, but if you do nothing, there will be no results.”
“If you find a way to motivate an idiot you have a motivated idiot”
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14

(12-29-2017, 04:00 PM)13Coronas Wrote:
(12-29-2017, 03:49 PM)13Coronas Wrote: Hillary rolled doubles 3 times lock her up!
This Order having been enacted by other presidents, but trump has  this one finely tuned to put the shackles on Hillary 
Buy the way she has an injured right ankle is it hiding an ankle bracket to track her movement

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-...orruption/

Did you actually read this?  It doesn't seem to apply to US citizens, only foreigners.
Reply

#15

(12-30-2017, 08:37 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:
(12-29-2017, 04:00 PM)13Coronas Wrote: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-...orruption/

Did you actually read this?  It doesn't seem to apply to US citizens, only foreigners.

Cut him some slack, as English appears to be his second (or third) language.
The sun's not yellow, it's chicken.
Reply

#16

Sorry I have to cut and paste the part you didn’t take the time to read and accused me of not reading
(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:

(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery
“You may never know what results come of your actions, but if you do nothing, there will be no results.”
“If you find a way to motivate an idiot you have a motivated idiot”
Reply

#17

It’s for real Trump armed this rocket at Crooked Hillary
“You may never know what results come of your actions, but if you do nothing, there will be no results.”
“If you find a way to motivate an idiot you have a motivated idiot”
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#18
(This post was last modified: 12-30-2017, 06:54 PM by The Real Marty.)

(12-30-2017, 03:34 PM)13Coronas Wrote: Sorry I have to cut and paste the part you didn’t take the time to read and accused me of not reading
(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:

(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery

(ii) any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

    (A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;
    (B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly                engaged in:
            (1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or                           the  extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or


You see the part in bold?  The parts you cited are underneath the part in bold.  Section (ii).   This applies to foreigners.  Not to Hillary Clinton.
Reply

#19

(12-30-2017, 06:52 PM)The Real Marty Wrote:
(12-30-2017, 03:34 PM)13Coronas Wrote: Sorry I have to cut and paste the part you didn’t take the time to read and accused me of not reading
(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:

(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery

(ii) any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

    (A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;
    (B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly                engaged in:
            (1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or                           the  extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or


You see the part in bold?  The parts you cited are underneath the part in bold.  Section (ii).   This applies to foreigners.  Not to Hillary Clinton.

Yep. Nothing has changed. Hillary is still above the law.




                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"
Reply

#20

(12-30-2017, 08:26 PM)MalabarJag Wrote:
(12-30-2017, 06:52 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: (ii) any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

    (A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;
    (B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly                engaged in:
            (1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or                           the  extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or


You see the part in bold?  The parts you cited are underneath the part in bold.  Section (ii).   This applies to foreigners.  Not to Hillary Clinton.

Yep. Nothing has changed. Hillary is still above the law.

Is that better of worse than Donald - who wants to be the law?
The sun's not yellow, it's chicken.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!