01-29-2018, 11:41 AM
With Dez Bryant potentially being available, there you go? I'm kidding because Tom Coughlin wouldn't go the Bad Moon route again. I could see Dallas letting Bryant go and engaging for AR.
(01-29-2018, 11:37 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]Great QB's can "create" an elite receiver.
(01-29-2018, 11:31 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Which is why we need to sign our proven #1 WR. The Jags can not walk into next season with Cole or Westbrook as the #1.(01-29-2018, 11:25 AM)FBT Wrote: [ -> ]The offense missed Robinson the entire year. To say we did just fine without him is pretty shortsighted.
I agree that we missed a true #1 WR this season.
I am a little worried that fans are getting a little too comfortable with the success we had and think it is going to repeat pretty easily.
(01-29-2018, 11:34 AM)Ronster Wrote: [ -> ]This is the most short sighted post in a while. I wonder why the Pats have proven success without true #1 WRs.....(01-29-2018, 11:25 AM)FBT Wrote: [ -> ]The offense missed Robinson the entire year. To say we did just fine without him is pretty shortsighted.
You are entitled to your opinion and me mine. And it is not short sighted, it is looking at the big picture. We need to keep our defense intact as much as possible, our offense will always be junk as long as Bortles is the QB. Hell our running back doesn't even understand to put his hands out to catch a ball. I could care less about A-Rob. All those teams with super star receivers are doing what this next Sunday? That's right, watching the game on T.V. The Patriots prove year after year that you need functional receivers that are able to hold on to the ball. Save the money, get some line help on the offense and solidify our defense.
(01-29-2018, 11:37 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]Great QB's can "create" an elite receiver.
(01-29-2018, 11:37 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]Great QB's can "create" an elite receiver.
(01-29-2018, 12:08 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: [ -> ](01-29-2018, 11:37 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]Great QB's can "create" an elite receiver.
Great QBs are harder to find than great receivers.
Of course, Robinson will want a lot guaranteed, but I wonder if we can give him an incentive first year. Which, when met, guarantees a lot in the second year and beyond. Start with a decent base (around $8mil) with incentives up to $15mil.
He may not think he can meet his incentives with Bortles. I wouldn’t be surprised if he doesn’t want to be here at all.
(01-29-2018, 12:19 PM)UTheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ](01-29-2018, 12:08 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: [ -> ]Great QBs are harder to find than great receivers.
Of course, Robinson will want a lot guaranteed, but I wonder if we can give him an incentive first year. Which, when met, guarantees a lot in the second year and beyond. Start with a decent base (around $8mil) with incentives up to $15mil.
He may not think he can meet his incentives with Bortles. I wouldn’t be surprised if he doesn’t want to be here at all.
That does not diminish the fact that we need to find, at least a good QB. We've been getting by with a pedestrian one.
(01-29-2018, 11:41 AM)MoJagFan Wrote: [ -> ]With Dez Bryant potentially being available, there you go? I'm kidding because Tom Coughlin wouldn't go the Bad Moon route again. I could see Dallas letting Bryant go and engaging for AR.
(01-29-2018, 12:23 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: [ -> ](01-29-2018, 12:19 PM)UTheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]That does not diminish the fact that we need to find, at least a good QB. We've been getting by with a pedestrian one.
I’m fine with still looking at QB in the draft. I’m fine with signing someone at QB if they’re better than Bortles. I just don’t think anyone fits that criteria this year... except Cousins who I don’t think we’ll sign. Bortles wasn’t great but he certainly wasn’t pedestrian.
We assign a lot of blame against Bortles when he fails, but we ignore when QBs like Smith do the same. Since I don’t think anyone better than a bortles is available, we should instead spend the money on helping him be better.
(01-29-2018, 11:23 AM)FBT Wrote: [ -> ](01-29-2018, 10:45 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]Yep. I'm not gonna get myself tied to a player I'm not confident in. I will address the need for a big WR in the draft, but I wanna keep our defense together as long as possible and to do that, we have to be smart with our free agent spending from here on out.
ACLs are not the career impacting injuries they used to be. If anything, that knee will come back stronger than before the injury.
I’d be inclined to franchise him. The tag would give the team time to work out a long term deal before the season starts.
(01-29-2018, 11:37 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]Great QB's can "create" an elite receiver.
(01-29-2018, 10:30 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ](01-29-2018, 09:45 AM)Jaxson Wrote: [ -> ]Allen Robinson: 'Main focus' is recovery, not contract
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000...t-contract
With Allen Robinson's contract expiring when the new league year begins this March, what will the Jacksonville Jaguars be willing to offer the wideout who's coming off a serious knee injury.
I'd only offer a modest, 1 year prove it deal. Shew he's at least better than how he performed in 2016. I wouldn't expect him to return to his 2015 form so soon after the injury, but he'd at least have to be better than 2016 ARob. We don't need that.
(01-29-2018, 11:31 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ](01-29-2018, 11:25 AM)FBT Wrote: [ -> ]The offense missed Robinson the entire year. To say we did just fine without him is pretty shortsighted.
I agree that we missed a true #1 WR this season.
I am a little worried that fans are getting a little too comfortable with the success we had and think it is going to repeat pretty easily.