Doubt it. I think we're done on player moves and will be focusing on drafting players and possibly moving up or down.
I'd love to get Foles, but the price tag will be way too high.
(04-20-2018, 02:09 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]I'd love to get Foles, but the price tag will be way too high.
Or even Tannehill. But again, high price
Gronk will retire if he gets traded. He's about to do it now playing with Brady. You really think he'll play if his new QB is someone like Tyrod or Josh McCown? (Just naming random qbs)
(04-20-2018, 02:15 PM)SamusAranX Wrote: [ -> ] (04-20-2018, 02:09 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]I'd love to get Foles, but the price tag will be way too high.
Or even Tannehill. But again, high price
Not bashing you but just curious...why would you even want Tannehill? I wouldn't want him. I know he has been injured a lot but when he is healthy, he doesn't seem to show anything that would deem it a good decision to give up value for him.
Tannehill? Isn't he just a non-durable Bortles?
(04-20-2018, 02:48 PM)MoJagFan Wrote: [ -> ]Tannehill? Isn't he just a non-durable Bortles?
I would assume as a back up
I was looking more at Clay Matthews or Ansah as an OLB... or do they only fit in a 3-4 system?
(04-20-2018, 02:15 PM)SamusAranX Wrote: [ -> ] (04-20-2018, 02:09 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]I'd love to get Foles, but the price tag will be way too high.
Or even Tannehill. But again, high price
Tannehill is a good, yet not great QB with injury problems. Although I view him as a slight upgrade over Bortles when healthy, Tannehill always seems to be hurt and is unreliable. I would pass on him.
Tannehill is much more accurate than Blake, and is overall a little better. He is very close to becoming a journeyman QB tho if he doesn't produce this year. I wouldn't give much for him.
(04-20-2018, 02:40 PM)imtheblkranger Wrote: [ -> ]Gronk will retire if he gets traded. He's about to do it now playing with Brady. You really think he'll play if his new QB is someone like Tyrod or Josh McCown? (Just naming random qbs)
The NAACP and AARP Organizations are coming after you !!!
(04-21-2018, 09:49 PM)HURRICANE!!! Wrote: [ -> ] (04-20-2018, 02:40 PM)imtheblkranger Wrote: [ -> ]Gronk will retire if he gets traded. He's about to do it now playing with Brady. You really think he'll play if his new QB is someone like Tyrod or Josh McCown? (Just naming random qbs)
The NAACP and AARP Organizations are coming after you !!!
It's ok, I'm a Millennial
If the Jags get comfortable with the growth that Smoot could exhibit, it would not shock me to see them trade Fowler. I don't see them picking up the 5th year option, or signing him to a long term deal with the money his agent will demand. With a year left on his rookie deal, it would not shock me to hear TC and DC making some calls to test the trade waters.
(04-21-2018, 10:27 PM)ATLjag Wrote: [ -> ]If the Jags get comfortable with the growth that Smoot could exhibit, it would not shock me to see them trade Fowler. I don't see them picking up the 5th year option, or signing him to a long term deal with the money his agent will demand. With a year left on his rookie deal, it would not shock me to hear TC and DC making some calls to test the trade waters.
I would not be upset. We can only afford so many veteran stars on this team, and we need to start accumulating younger talent there. We NEED Smoot to develop, but we probably need a young DT that can replace Malik or Dareus. When Jack, Ramsey and Yannick get ready for a new contract we will have to replace Malik, Dareus, and Calais to afford them.
(04-22-2018, 10:15 AM)brianmsbc Wrote: [ -> ] (04-21-2018, 10:27 PM)ATLjag Wrote: [ -> ]If the Jags get comfortable with the growth that Smoot could exhibit, it would not shock me to see them trade Fowler. I don't see them picking up the 5th year option, or signing him to a long term deal with the money his agent will demand. With a year left on his rookie deal, it would not shock me to hear TC and DC making some calls to test the trade waters.
I would not be upset. We can only afford so many veteran stars on this team, and we need to start accumulating younger talent there. We NEED Smoot to develop, but we probably need a young DT that can replace Malik or Dareus. When Jack, Ramsey and Yannick get ready for a new contract we will have to replace Malik, Dareus, and Calais to afford them.
They will not have to replace
all of those guys and I don't think Jackson is even in the conversation unless he plays poorly in 2018 for some reason.
I think just drafting a replacement for one of Dareus
or Campbell - and also a replacement for Gipson may clear plenty of room to get all of those younger guys back in the building on new deals.
Wondering if TC might float a 7th rounder for Ereck Flowers as possible RG competition. He wasn't good at all at OT but may be worth it as a Guard.
(04-21-2018, 10:27 PM)ATLjag Wrote: [ -> ]If the Jags get comfortable with the growth that Smoot could exhibit, it would not shock me to see them trade Fowler. I don't see them picking up the 5th year option, or signing him to a long term deal with the money his agent will demand. With a year left on his rookie deal, it would not shock me to hear TC and DC making some calls to test the trade waters.
I agree, but on the other hand, if Smoot does indeed develop, we could have Smoot, Campbell, Ngakoue, and Fowler rushing the passer with Ramsey and Bouye behind them. I'd sure like to see that, even if it only lasts one year.
Surely Gronk might be worth a season?