https://www.si.com/nfl/2018/04/27/draft-...rius-guice
61. Jacksonville: Anthony Miller, WR, Memphis
You’ll have to find a role for him, but he’s competitive and produced, and seems like Doug Marrone’s kind of guy.
I wouldnt be upset at all with this pick if the draft fell that way. Miller or Smith would be my top 2 guys
Miller is going to be a star. As much as WR is low on my list, I wouldn't mind this selection at all...B.A.P.
(04-27-2018, 05:11 PM)JaG4LyFe Wrote: [ -> ]Miller is going to be a star. As much as WR is low on my list, I wouldn't mind this selection at all...B.A.P.
My thought as well
If we are going WR sign me up for Milller at that spot.
He is my favorite WR so while I prefer OL I could hold off another round for him.
I'd rather St. Brown, we need a dynamic and big WR...but Miller is very good if not a bit redundant to what we have skill wise.
Wow. Rudolph the pick before and Brown the pick after. Nuts.
I hope it doesn't go this way. All the top OG's are gone.
I want us to address the offensive line but wouldn't be upset with this. Really, I could be convinced for any position other than maybe LB or S.
(04-27-2018, 06:07 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]I hope it doesn't go this way. All the top OG's are gone.
Braden Smith is available
(04-27-2018, 06:12 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ] (04-27-2018, 06:07 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]I hope it doesn't go this way. All the top OG's are gone.
Braden Smith is available
He's a good run blocker, but his pass protection is not that great.
(04-27-2018, 06:14 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ] (04-27-2018, 06:12 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]Braden Smith is available
He's a good run blocker, but his pass protection is not that great.
its not bad, good value imo at the end of the 2nd. Played RG too which is a plus
(04-27-2018, 06:15 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ] (04-27-2018, 06:14 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]He's a good run blocker, but his pass protection is not that great.
its not bad, good value imo at the end of the 2nd. Played RG too which is a plus
It's not good. You'd basically be trading one weakness, (Cann's run blocking) for another, (Smith's pass protection).
(04-27-2018, 06:24 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ] (04-27-2018, 06:15 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]its not bad, good value imo at the end of the 2nd. Played RG too which is a plus
It's not good. You'd basically be trading one weakness, (Cann's run blocking) for another, (Smith's pass protection).
Hes better than Price in pass protection. He is a day 1 starter at G, its the bottom of the 2nd round, you wont find a flawless prospect
(04-27-2018, 06:32 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ] (04-27-2018, 06:24 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]It's not good. You'd basically be trading one weakness, (Cann's run blocking) for another, (Smith's pass protection).
Hes better than Price in pass protection. He is a day 1 starter at G, its the bottom of the 2nd round, you wont find a flawless prospect
No.
(04-27-2018, 06:59 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ] (04-27-2018, 06:32 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]Hes better than Price in pass protection. He is a day 1 starter at G, its the bottom of the 2nd round, you wont find a flawless prospect
No.
yes, here is a chart to help you out
http://www.1500espn.com/vikings-2/2018/0...lly-price/
(04-27-2018, 07:10 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ] (04-27-2018, 07:09 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]I don't need a chart to tell me what my eyes see.
lol, you need glasses, didnt even have Barkley in your top 50
Braden Smith gave up 2 sacks against Clemson.
(04-27-2018, 07:20 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ] (04-27-2018, 07:10 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]lol, you need glasses, didnt even have Barkley in your top 50
Braden Smith gave up 2 sacks against Clemson.
You might die on that Barkley sword my friend lol