And the Democrats have this as public enemy one if they take back the house in November. I have faith that the American people will do what is right.
The benefit is almost exclusively for the rich today. By design there is a miniscule and temporary bump. Also by design this slight increase becomes an exponential deficit over the next 10 years. Its all spelled out. Read the [BLEEP] legislation, not some dick sucking fluff piece that says this is the best thing ever.
And ask yourself.. WHY THE HELL DO THE UBER RICH NEED RELIEF WHEN MOST OF AMERICA IS PAYCHECK TO PAYCHECK?
(08-07-2018, 09:11 PM)Kotite Wrote: [ -> ]The benefit is almost exclusively for the rich today. By design there is a miniscule and temporary bump. Also by design this slight increase becomes an exponential deficit over the next 10 years. Its all spelled out. Read the [BLEEP] legislation, not some dick sucking fluff piece that says this is the best thing ever.
And ask yourself.. WHY THE HELL DO THE UBER RICH NEED RELIEF WHEN MOST OF AMERICA IS PAYCHECK TO PAYCHECK?
My My, you have such a negative outlook......
Deficit..... only if congress keeps spending like a drunken sailor
And why shouldn't the people that earn it keep it? If you take a risk, you deserve the reward not some Politician.
Why the average American is saving thru tax reform will be continued, wages will rise and they'll have even more money in their pocket.
Upward mobility is not some fairy tale, you can do it to if you have the guts and the fortitude to try.
(08-07-2018, 09:48 PM)The Drifter Wrote: [ -> ] (08-07-2018, 09:11 PM)Kotite Wrote: [ -> ]The benefit is almost exclusively for the rich today. By design there is a miniscule and temporary bump. Also by design this slight increase becomes an exponential deficit over the next 10 years. Its all spelled out. Read the [BLEEP] legislation, not some dick sucking fluff piece that says this is the best thing ever.
And ask yourself.. WHY THE HELL DO THE UBER RICH NEED RELIEF WHEN MOST OF AMERICA IS PAYCHECK TO PAYCHECK?
My My, you have such a negative outlook......
Deficit..... only if congress keeps spending like a drunken sailor
And why shouldn't the people that earn it keep it? If you take a risk, you deserve the reward not some Politician.
Why the average American is saving thru tax reform will be continued, wages will rise and they'll have even more money in their pocket.
Upward mobility is not some fairy tale, you can do it to if you have the guts and the fortitude to try.
The President could veto the budget if the deficit would be too high. That would give a government shutdown and some payments would stop. He could demand that some of that stop be permanent as a condition of re-opening government. But he won't. Why?
(08-07-2018, 09:11 PM)Kotite Wrote: [ -> ]The benefit is almost exclusively for the rich today. By design there is a miniscule and temporary bump. Also by design this slight increase becomes an exponential deficit over the next 10 years. Its all spelled out. Read the [BLEEP] legislation, not some dick sucking fluff piece that says this is the best thing ever.
And ask yourself.. WHY THE HELL DO THE UBER RICH NEED RELIEF WHEN MOST OF AMERICA IS PAYCHECK TO PAYCHECK?
Kotite, we've disagreed a lot over the years but frankly, you're better than this.
(08-08-2018, 09:37 AM)jj82284 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-07-2018, 09:11 PM)Kotite Wrote: [ -> ]The benefit is almost exclusively for the rich today. By design there is a miniscule and temporary bump. Also by design this slight increase becomes an exponential deficit over the next 10 years. Its all spelled out. Read the [BLEEP] legislation, not some dick sucking fluff piece that says this is the best thing ever.
And ask yourself.. WHY THE HELL DO THE UBER RICH NEED RELIEF WHEN MOST OF AMERICA IS PAYCHECK TO PAYCHECK?
Kotite, we've disagreed a lot over the years but frankly, you're better than this.
To be honest, this is a common problem we are seeing today. People hate Trump SO much they refuse to recognize any policy changes under him are beneficial to them. Trump Derangement Syndrome is a real thing.
Raise your hand if any of you actually read the legislation.. Bueller? Bueller?
(08-11-2018, 12:39 PM)Kotite Wrote: [ -> ]Raise your hand if any of you actually read the legislation.. Bueller? Bueller?
Was it part of the bonus packet my wife got this year?