Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Quote:You mean Information that is already widely known, and published?  

 

Speculation vs Confirmation. 

Not a big deal at all. This is information you could have gotten from Wikipedia.


Check the date on this article I found after a quick Google search.

Quote:

U.S. presidents are currently given a four-minute window to decide whether or not to initiate an irreversible apocalypse. Sad!

<a class="bbc_url" href='http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/08/05/our-nuclear-procedures-are-crazier-than-trump/'>http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/08/05/our-nuclear-procedures-are-crazier-than-trump/</a>

That was not what she said. Her comment was four minutes after the president gives an order it is executed.

Quote:You mean Information that is already widely known, and published?

  

Quote:Speculation vs Confirmation.

The second post answers the first. Of course, as much of a liar Clinton is it's probably not even accurate.

Quote:Not a big deal at all. This is information you could have gotten from Wikipedia.

Check the date on this article I found after a quick Google search.
<a class="bbc_url" href='http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/08/05/our-nuclear-procedures-are-crazier-than-trump/'>http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/08/05/our-nuclear-procedures-are-crazier-than-trump/</a>

Because Wikipedia is a bastion of accurate information.

Quote:The second post answers the first. Of course, as much of a liar Clinton is it's probably not even accurate.

 

If that information was not accurate it would not have been caught by the debate fact checkers. It was not mentioned once on those sites. So yes, she is correct about four minutes.

Quote:Because Wikipedia is a bastion of accurate information.

It just linked to the article which is hardly the only place our nuclear response time is outlined. This is much ado about nothing.

Quote:If that information was not accurate it would not have been caught by the debate fact checkers. It was not mentioned once on those sites. So yes, she is correct about four minutes.

And that's why she had no business saying it. More failure from one of the worst politicians of all time.

Quote:And that's why she had no business saying it. More failure from one of the worst politicians of all time.

She had no business saying something that anyone with Google can locate. Better shut down the internet to protect us from jihadists.

Quote:It just linked to the article which is hardly the only place our nuclear response time is outlined. This is much ado about nothing.

Trump supporters are embarrassing themselves about matters they are ignorant to. It's to be expected if you really pay attention to the supporters he attracts.

Quote:Trump supporters are embarrassing themselves about matters they are ignorant to. It's to be expected if you really pay attention to the supporters he attracts.

And what kind of supporters does Trump attract in your opinion?

Quote:And what kind of supporters does Trump attract in your opinion?

The kind that regularly click Breitbart.

Quote:The kind that regularly click Breitbart.

I support Trump and have maybe been on there once during this election.

Quote:I support Trump and have maybe been on there once during this election.

That doesn't change facts. That a large portion of his support get their views from the hate machine Bannon runs.


I mean he appointed their leader his CEO, Trump is paying Andrews video editor to make fake videos. Rudy G repeats Breitbart headlines at ever stop he makes.

Quote:Because Wikipedia is a bastion of accurate information.

<a class="bbc_url" href='https://youtu.be/oTKOqH0mF9c'>https://youtu.be/oTKOqH0mF9c</a>


Fast forward to the 9:30 mark.


This was in interview done in 1979 by Zbigniew Brzezinski who was President Jimmy Carter’s national security advisor.


1979.


Again this information has been widely available for a long time.

Quote:The kind that regularly click Breitbart.

I'm not a Trump supporter by any means. And I guess I have to go see what this Breitbart is since I have no freaking clue.

Quote:It just linked to the article which is hardly the only place our nuclear response time is outlined. This is much ado about nothing.

 

 

Quote:<a class="bbc_url" href='https://youtu.be/oTKOqH0mF9c'>https://youtu.be/oTKOqH0mF9c</a>


Fast forward to the 9:30 mark.


This was in interview done in 1979 by Zbigniew Brzezinski who was President Jimmy Carter’s national security advisor.

1979.


Again this information has been widely available for a long time.

I think it's pretty jacked up something that sensitive is so easily found. I guess because it has to do with national security and it's nuclear it should be a closely guarded secret. Thanks for the clarification.

Quote:I think it's pretty jacked up something that sensitive is so easily found. I guess because it has to do with national security and it's nuclear it should be a closely guarded secret. Thanks for the clarification.

 

You are missing the point. Everyone is telling you there is nothing wrong with Hillary Clinton saying what has never been a closely guarded secret because many Americans already know it anyway. Whether it should be a top secret or not is, according to everyone except you, irrelevant.

Quote:The parts I don't watch.


So all of it.


I pity those who are prolonging their agony here. This election was over the day Trump accepted the GOP nomination. Just cast your vote for Gary Johnson and prepare for four years of Queen Hillary.

Been saying it for months. Thank you. 8 years of Hillary is probably more correct tho-

Quote:That doesn't change facts. That a large portion of his support get their views from the hate machine Bannon runs.


I mean he appointed their leader his CEO, Trump is paying Andrews video editor to make fake videos. Rudy G repeats Breitbart headlines at ever stop he makes.

QFT