(08-26-2018, 08:38 PM)MojoKing Wrote: [ -> ]not gonna read the thread (just read this 5th page and it’s already derailed) but...
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck...
Flynn
Manafort
Page
Cohen
Papadopoulos
Roger Stone
Felix Slater
All tied to Russia or pleaded guilty to an illegal activity
And that’s just off the top of my head.
Don Jr. should be worried.
Forget collusion, this is treason
Don't worry, we can tell u didn't read the thread.
Anybody on this thread want to double down on their foolishness, cuz Michael Cohen just doubled-down on his!
(08-26-2018, 09:57 AM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-25-2018, 07:28 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]So I'm on the hook for your stupid decisions? Pardon me for being offended for how other people use my time, effort, and life without my consent. No, it's your problem, leave me out of it.
That's nice. Especially how I'm selfish for wanting to keep what's mine. Jackass.
It's your lack of compassion for people that makes you such a nasty individual.
Hang on, he said he didn't support the Clean needle exchange program, that makes him a non compassionate person?
I don't support any form of federal welfare, I assure you I have plenty of compassion but welfare is not compassion. As for the clean needle exchange you can argue a form of prevention that is better than rective legislation but you can't argue that it doesn't encourage narcotic use.
Sounds like this got personal for you, take a step back.
(08-24-2018, 10:01 PM)Jamies_fried_chicken Wrote: [ -> ] (08-24-2018, 08:43 AM)jj82284 Wrote: [ -> ]Was reading through my pocket constitution this morning, didn't see the right to illegal intravenous drug use. What am I missing?
And if his citizens are taxed then he should advocate for their money back
The needle exchange program doesn’t endorse drug use. It’s goal just like the HIV/ AIDS crisis of the 80’s was to slow the spread of the virus through contaminated needles. The common theme between Regan and Pence was their “morals” conflicted with how to respond to the epidemic. That’s what you are missing.
He can’t asked for money back because he promised HIP (Healthy Indiana Plan) will remain even if it’s repealed.
Good try on the deflection.
It has nothing to do with morals, it's called comon sense. Supplying junkies with clean needles and saying it deosnt encourage narcotic use is ridiculous. I don't care what the goal is the out come is easier narcotic use.
Listen I don't have a problem with narcotics. Someone wants to shoot up go for it, just do it at home and don't ask me to pay for your treatment when your done, and for damn sure don't ask me to pay for you supplies to do it lol. If that's your definition of selfish then by golloy your selfish because you won't provide me with free smokes today at work! Oh and I want free lighters it's not fair that I have to buy those. By gosh you better pay for my cancer treatment one day.
(11-30-2018, 07:04 AM)EricC85 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-24-2018, 10:01 PM)Jamies_fried_chicken Wrote: [ -> ]The needle exchange program doesn’t endorse drug use. It’s goal just like the HIV/ AIDS crisis of the 80’s was to slow the spread of the virus through contaminated needles. The common theme between Regan and Pence was their “morals” conflicted with how to respond to the epidemic. That’s what you are missing.
He can’t asked for money back because he promised HIP (Healthy Indiana Plan) will remain even if it’s repealed.
Good try on the deflection.
It has nothing to do with morals, it's called comon sense. Supplying junkies with clean needles and saying it deosnt encourage narcotic use is ridiculous. I don't care what the goal is the out come is easier narcotic use.
Listen I don't have a problem with narcotics. Someone wants to shoot up go for it, just do it at home and don't ask me to pay for your treatment when your done, and for damn sure don't ask me to pay for you supplies to do it lol. If that's your definition of selfish then by golloy your selfish because you won't provide me with free smokes today at work! Oh and I want free lighters it's not fair that I have to buy those. By gosh you better pay for my cancer treatment one day.
Supplying needles doesn't encourage or enable increased drug use, it just makes it safer. No junkie is going to skip a fix because a needle is dirty, and believe me, they'll have a needle.
(11-30-2018, 11:03 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ] (11-30-2018, 07:04 AM)EricC85 Wrote: [ -> ]It has nothing to do with morals, it's called comon sense. Supplying junkies with clean needles and saying it deosnt encourage narcotic use is ridiculous. I don't care what the goal is the out come is easier narcotic use.
Listen I don't have a problem with narcotics. Someone wants to shoot up go for it, just do it at home and don't ask me to pay for your treatment when your done, and for damn sure don't ask me to pay for you supplies to do it lol. If that's your definition of selfish then by golloy your selfish because you won't provide me with free smokes today at work! Oh and I want free lighters it's not fair that I have to buy those. By gosh you better pay for my cancer treatment one day.
Supplying needles doesn't encourage or enable increased drug use, it just makes it safer. No junkie is going to skip a fix because a needle is dirty, and believe me, they'll have a needle.
I dont care to pay to make your vice safer. And participating in your vice by providing a neccessary mechanism is absolutely condoning it, which removes the stigma and encourages the behavior.
(11-30-2018, 11:03 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ] (11-30-2018, 07:04 AM)EricC85 Wrote: [ -> ]It has nothing to do with morals, it's called comon sense. Supplying junkies with clean needles and saying it deosnt encourage narcotic use is ridiculous. I don't care what the goal is the out come is easier narcotic use.
Listen I don't have a problem with narcotics. Someone wants to shoot up go for it, just do it at home and don't ask me to pay for your treatment when your done, and for damn sure don't ask me to pay for you supplies to do it lol. If that's your definition of selfish then by golloy your selfish because you won't provide me with free smokes today at work! Oh and I want free lighters it's not fair that I have to buy those. By gosh you better pay for my cancer treatment one day.
Supplying needles doesn't encourage or enable increased drug use, it just makes it safer. No junkie is going to skip a fix because a needle is dirty, and believe me, they'll have a needle.
Fair point it probably doesn't make it any easier but what's the argument that as a tax payer I should subsidize any recreational activity not to mention an illegal activity?
(11-30-2018, 06:58 AM)EricC85 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-26-2018, 09:57 AM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]It's your lack of compassion for people that makes you such a nasty individual.
Hang on, he said he didn't support the Clean needle exchange program, that makes him a non compassionate person?
I don't support any form of federal welfare, I assure you I have plenty of compassion but welfare is not compassion. As for the clean needle exchange you can argue a form of prevention that is better than rective legislation but you can't argue that it doesn't encourage narcotic use.
Sounds like this got personal for you, take a step back.
Lol. Okay. I haven't said a word to him about this since the post you're replying to and it's been awhile. I'm pretty sure I let it go a day or so after I posted it.
(12-02-2018, 04:25 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-30-2018, 06:58 AM)EricC85 Wrote: [ -> ]Hang on, he said he didn't support the Clean needle exchange program, that makes him a non compassionate person?
I don't support any form of federal welfare, I assure you I have plenty of compassion but welfare is not compassion. As for the clean needle exchange you can argue a form of prevention that is better than rective legislation but you can't argue that it doesn't encourage narcotic use.
Sounds like this got personal for you, take a step back.
Lol. Okay. I haven't said a word to him about this since the post you're replying to and it's been awhile. I'm pretty sure I let it go a day or so after I posted it.
Wait wait wait...you let it go?
You let it GO????
LET.
IT.
GO?!?!?!?!?
I gotta work harder.
(12-02-2018, 05:04 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2018, 04:25 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]Lol. Okay. I haven't said a word to him about this since the post you're replying to and it's been awhile. I'm pretty sure I let it go a day or so after I posted it.
Wait wait wait...you let it go?
You let it GO????
LET.
IT.
GO?!?!?!?!?
I gotta work harder.
Dude, trust me when I say you don't.
You're still a burr in my saddle on 99% of everything you say. I hope that helps you feel better. Lol.
Uninformed threads like these never fail to bring me the lulz.
Some of you will be extremely disappointed when this comes to an end (which will likely be soon) and it's not anything close to what you were expecting it to be.
Mueller says he can prove that Trump's campaign manager was in regular contact with a member of the Russian military hacking team that broke into the DNC emails, before the hack, after the hack, and after the election. Drip drip.
(12-07-2018, 09:02 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Mueller says he can prove that Trump's campaign manager was in regular contact with a member of the Russian military hacking team that broke into the DNC emails, before the hack, after the hack, and after the election. Drip drip.
Yeah, OK.
Assange has said, multiple times, that he was willing to prove that Russia wasn't involved. Mueller, of course, doesn't want that information.
(12-07-2018, 09:26 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: [ -> ] (12-07-2018, 09:02 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Mueller says he can prove that Trump's campaign manager was in regular contact with a member of the Russian military hacking team that broke into the DNC emails, before the hack, after the hack, and after the election. Drip drip.
Yeah, OK.
Assange has said, multiple times, that he was willing to prove that Russia wasn't involved. Mueller, of course, doesn't want that information.
That dog won't hunt.
Assange has made his name by announcing that he has confidential information and then releasing it to the entire public in a matter of weeks.
It would be completely unlike him to acquire proof and not disclose it by now.
(12-07-2018, 09:26 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: [ -> ] (12-07-2018, 09:02 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Mueller says he can prove that Trump's campaign manager was in regular contact with a member of the Russian military hacking team that broke into the DNC emails, before the hack, after the hack, and after the election. Drip drip.
Yeah, OK.
Assange has said, multiple times, that he was willing to prove that Russia wasn't involved. Mueller, of course, doesn't want that information.
So now we trust Assange, who has been implicated from the very beginning?
Impeachment is a political act. I know it's all cloaked in BS about "high crimes and misdemeanors," but in reality, it's political. And with the Senate controlled by the Republicans, the house might impeach him, but the senate won't convict him.
UNLESS, the economy goes south, and his base shrinks. Then, some Republicans might start thinking he can't get re-elected, and then, impeachment with conviction comes into play.
(12-07-2018, 11:29 PM)TJBender Wrote: [ -> ] (12-07-2018, 09:26 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah, OK.
Assange has said, multiple times, that he was willing to prove that Russia wasn't involved. Mueller, of course, doesn't want that information.
So now we trust Assange, who has been implicated from the very beginning?
Assange deserves the death penalty for releasing top secret information that resulted in the deaths of US informants.
But Wikileaks has always leaked real information, it is never made up. Assange appears to value the truth, even when it causes harm, and he has no reason to lie in this matter. It's not as if supporting Trump and Trump's agenda would gain him anything.
(12-08-2018, 10:54 AM)MalabarJag Wrote: [ -> ] (12-07-2018, 11:29 PM)TJBender Wrote: [ -> ]So now we trust Assange, who has been implicated from the very beginning?
Assange deserves the death penalty for releasing top secret information that resulted in the deaths of US informants.
But Wikileaks has always leaked real information, it is never made up. Assange appears to value the truth, even when it causes harm, and he has no reason to lie in this matter. It's not as if supporting Trump and Trump's agenda would gain him anything.
But wikileaks has never said that it has the goods and then failed to deliver them.
CIA Crimes: How John Brennan Weaponized the CIA and FBI, and Conspired with Russia and Harry Reid to Frame Trump—PART A
There are 8 parts to this extremely detailed timeline of events.
https://chaletbooks.com/chaletreports/?p=1362
(12-08-2018, 11:08 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]But wikileaks has never said that it has the goods and then failed to deliver them.
Wikileaks has never outed a confidential source. But he offered the information to Mueller's team, who had no interest in it. Of course Mueller knows Seth Rich was the leaker and Podesta ordered the hit. Does everyone forget what was actually IN the leaked emails? Like the one about making an example out of the leaker? Or the one about Antonin Scalia going to Texas and never returning?