(10-07-2018, 03:57 PM)JagFanatic24 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-07-2018, 12:25 AM)TearExtractor Wrote: [ -> ]Tayven Bryan has 0 interceptions, 0 forced fumbles, 0 passing yards, 0 kick off returns, 0 field goals.
A big fat 0 on the stat sheet, bust.
Bro he plays on an all pro defense, whose gonna sit for him to get stats?
Pretty sure he was being sarcastic.
Why did lf not travel with the team to kc?
(10-07-2018, 10:35 PM)surfon Wrote: [ -> ]Why did lf not travel with the team to kc?
Air travel is not recommended to players rehabbing injury. Pressurization and depressurization takes a toll on one's body and affects blood circulation. That's not good for a hamstring injury. If he's ruled out early in the week, no point in getting on a plane.
(10-05-2018, 03:22 PM)paksat Wrote: [ -> ] (10-04-2018, 07:08 PM)jaguarmvp Wrote: [ -> ]Pot calling the kettle black eh? Lets look at your posting history and how many times you have been wrong. I would get carpel tunnel typing out the bs coming from this guy. He has a history supporting losers on this team. I think someone takes a dump in his cheerios every morning because almost every post reeks of pms. Little guy I know you got beat up growing up but now you are a real keyboard hero. Good job
lollll yah this guy defended that bald headed dumb [BLEEP] we had for a head coach whom I won't even name for years when I called him out
to this day nothings changed, that beer bellied loser is still the worst coach in nfl history and FBT is still the worst poster on this board
oh dont get me started on FBT and how much he has been wrong and then flip flopped AFTER THE FACT to act like he was right...
were you guys even here for his gene smith days?? O LORD you should have seen the names he called me and others who realized how bad Gene Smith was real early on in the process... but man o man did he defend gene smith, and then as soon, AS SOON as gene was let go, FBT joined in the with the jokes on how bad gene smith was, as if he was in on it the entire time
dude is the flip flop master, the king of company line BS
(10-05-2018, 05:29 PM)Rico Wrote: [ -> ] (10-05-2018, 04:26 PM)paksat Wrote: [ -> ]Don't just say incorrect.
what's his stats then?
Why? Too lazy to look it up? I did. Or do you just prefer to shoot your mouth off without thinking. Actually I know the answer to that too, my bad.
wake me up when he has more than 4 sacks in a year tough guy.
dude did jack in the SEC against the actual real competition
(10-08-2018, 08:13 AM)Krayz_Jville_D Wrote: [ -> ] (10-05-2018, 03:22 PM)paksat Wrote: [ -> ]lollll yah this guy defended that bald headed dumb [BLEEP] we had for a head coach whom I won't even name for years when I called him out
to this day nothings changed, that beer bellied loser is still the worst coach in nfl history and FBT is still the worst poster on this board
oh dont get me started on FBT and how much he has been wrong and then flip flopped AFTER THE FACT to act like he was right...
were you guys even here for his gene smith days?? O LORD you should have seen the names he called me and others who realized how bad Gene Smith was real early on in the process... but man o man did he defend gene smith, and then as soon, AS SOON as gene was let go, FBT joined in the with the jokes on how bad gene smith was, as if he was in on it the entire time
dude is the flip flop master, the king of company line BS
Let's not pretend you weren't doing the same exact thing but from the opposite point of view from FBT.
He's been consistently injured for 3 and half seasons now..time to draft a starter and pretend he doesn't exist..if he can suit up on game day great but building around a RB is bad, building around a RB who can't get on the field is extra extra bad.
(10-12-2018, 07:03 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: [ -> ] (10-08-2018, 08:13 AM)Krayz_Jville_D Wrote: [ -> ]oh dont get me started on FBT and how much he has been wrong and then flip flopped AFTER THE FACT to act like he was right...
were you guys even here for his gene smith days?? O LORD you should have seen the names he called me and others who realized how bad Gene Smith was real early on in the process... but man o man did he defend gene smith, and then as soon, AS SOON as gene was let go, FBT joined in the with the jokes on how bad gene smith was, as if he was in on it the entire time
dude is the flip flop master, the king of company line BS
Let's not pretend you weren't doing the same exact thing but from the opposite point of view from FBT.
what? what does that even mean?
(10-12-2018, 11:39 PM)JackCity Wrote: [ -> ]He's been consistently injured for 3 and half seasons now..time to draft a starter and pretend he doesn't exist..if he can suit up on game day great but building around a RB is bad, building around a RB who can't get on the field is extra extra bad.
3 and a half...counting from college. OK
(10-13-2018, 02:11 PM)BritJag Wrote: [ -> ] (10-12-2018, 11:39 PM)JackCity Wrote: [ -> ]He's been consistently injured for 3 and half seasons now..time to draft a starter and pretend he doesn't exist..if he can suit up on game day great but building around a RB is bad, building around a RB who can't get on the field is extra extra bad.
3 and a half...counting from college. OK
Chronic ankle issues in college too.
Regarding Fournette, I think the offense coaches are trying to go against the grain of current trends, but didn't prepare this team for what seemed like inevitabilities.
If you want to be a true power run team, sure, but you need better run blocking over the past 16 games or so (including last year and playoffs).
They to be consistent in that identity and have a trusted back up RB that fit Fournette's style in case of injuries. If that back was not there, they needed more flexible playbook that does "limit the team" when Yeldon, Grant or other similar style runner is in the game.
Maybe they trusted Bortles would improve his consistency, but it does not feel like they had 3rd or 4th option/plan thought out.
I think these frustrations lead to issues with a first round pick at DE in Taven Bryan. He was selected instead of getting more depth/options on the offensive line that has underperformed in the running game and been killed by injuries. They did not get another rookie RB later in the draft. It is not a horrible argument, though in hindsight, as predicting injuries is always tough. However, the team did have a let go a few decent DL players on cut days and have had questions about virtually every OL and RB since camp started. I know most of the rookie OL are not contributing either.
It may still be the best pick when things are all said and done in a few years, but if you are viewing this year as the real make-it or break-it year, it could be viewed as luxury or wasted pick.
(10-13-2018, 05:25 PM)rpr52121 Wrote: [ -> ] but if you are viewing this year as the real make-it or break-it year, it could be viewed as luxury or wasted pick.
Well, the FO isn't doing that.
It's an extra bit of a gut punch seeing OJ Howard score a TD and Malik Hooker come down with an INT. What should've been...
(10-14-2018, 03:01 PM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]It's an extra bit of a gut punch seeing OJ Howard score a TD and Malik Hooker come down with an INT. What should've been...
Howard has a long way to go to appear worth a #4 pick. I didn't oppose the notion at the time, but he hasn't made me regret not landing him yet.
(10-14-2018, 03:16 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2018, 03:01 PM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]It's an extra bit of a gut punch seeing OJ Howard score a TD and Malik Hooker come down with an INT. What should've been...
Howard has a long way to go to appear worth a #4 pick. I didn't oppose the notion at the time, but he hasn't made me regret not landing him yet.
He's already PFFs #1 TE. Beast in every facet. And TE aren't supposed to be this good this fast they're typically the slow burn position.
(10-14-2018, 03:21 PM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2018, 03:16 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]Howard has a long way to go to appear worth a #4 pick. I didn't oppose the notion at the time, but he hasn't made me regret not landing him yet.
He's already PFFs #1 TE. Beast in every facet. And TE aren't supposed to be this good this fast they're typically the slow burn position.
Like I said. Hasn't shown he's worth a #4 pick yet.
(10-14-2018, 03:01 PM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]It's an extra bit of a gut punch seeing OJ Howard score a TD and Malik Hooker come down with an INT. What should've been...
Hooker isn't better than Gipson, not yet anyway. Adams is the guy we missed on
(10-14-2018, 03:27 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2018, 03:01 PM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]It's an extra bit of a gut punch seeing OJ Howard score a TD and Malik Hooker come down with an INT. What should've been...
Hooker isn't better than Gipson, not yet anyway. Adams is the guy we missed on
They're all good, I like Adams a lot but Hooker's skill set is more rare. Harrison and Hooker could have been a damn good duo for very cheap for years.
(10-14-2018, 03:34 PM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2018, 03:27 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]Hooker isn't better than Gipson, not yet anyway. Adams is the guy we missed on
They're all good, I like Adams a lot but Hooker's skill set is more rare. Harrison and Hooker could have been a damn good duo for very cheap for years.
I think Gipson and Adams >> Harrison and Hooker
Gipson is a top 7 FS imo
(10-14-2018, 03:51 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2018, 03:34 PM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]They're all good, I like Adams a lot but Hooker's skill set is more rare. Harrison and Hooker could have been a damn good duo for very cheap for years.
I think Gipson and Adams >> Harrison and Hooker
Gipson is a top 7 FS imo
In all likelihood Gipson and Church are both gone for cap purposes soon...so it's which fits better with Harrison. As much as I like Adams I'll take the Earl Thomas 2.0. single high safety that can impact the game sideline to sideline. Those guys just don't come along often.