10-22-2018, 08:52 AM
With this offensive line, this team needs a mobile QB. We still have time to turn it around. He would fit well with what we run on offense. Or go the expensive route and trade a 2nd for Nick Foles
(10-22-2018, 09:05 AM)TravC59 Wrote: [ -> ]QB's are tough to go out and get, mostly due to contracts and the money involved. If I had my druthers, I would say go out and try to get Bridgewater or Bradford. Right now Bradford isn't even being dressed on Game days. They are sticking with the rookie and not allowing Bradford to come close to incentives built in to his deal.
(10-22-2018, 08:52 AM)BklynJag Wrote: [ -> ]With this offensive line, this team needs a mobile QB. We still have time to turn it around. He would fit well with what we run on offense. Or go the expensive route and trade a 2nd for Nick Foles
(10-22-2018, 10:33 AM)HURRICANE!!! Wrote: [ -> ](10-22-2018, 08:52 AM)BklynJag Wrote: [ -> ]With this offensive line, this team needs a mobile QB. We still have time to turn it around. He would fit well with what we run on offense. Or go the expensive route and trade a 2nd for Nick Foles
Kind of sad when we're looking to the Cleveland backups for help. Sad but very true.
(10-22-2018, 10:11 AM)Krayz_Jville_D Wrote: [ -> ]what we should have done instead of trading for hyde was trade a 7th for tyrod taylor, who I believe is a FA after this season so he doesnt tie up our future cap
we traded for a RB who didnt even get to play this week, and may only play 1 game before fournette is "back"
those of you who dont think tyrod taylor would be an upgrade here are once again wrong.. is he a future franchise QB? not even close.. but he's exactly what a bad O-line team needs.. a mobile QB who could use his legs to make plays and would make defenses have to account for that which opens up other things, think of how it is for us vs mobile qb's.. that strain and stress would be put on other teams, and the playaction roll out with taylor or even the read option would help us a ton
but hey, keep on pretending we are qb situation isnt as bad as it is
(10-22-2018, 11:25 AM)JagsFanClubOfMD Wrote: [ -> ](10-22-2018, 10:11 AM)Krayz_Jville_D Wrote: [ -> ]what we should have done instead of trading for hyde was trade a 7th for tyrod taylor, who I believe is a FA after this season so he doesnt tie up our future cap
we traded for a RB who didnt even get to play this week, and may only play 1 game before fournette is "back"
those of you who dont think tyrod taylor would be an upgrade here are once again wrong.. is he a future franchise QB? not even close.. but he's exactly what a bad O-line team needs.. a mobile QB who could use his legs to make plays and would make defenses have to account for that which opens up other things, think of how it is for us vs mobile qb's.. that strain and stress would be put on other teams, and the playaction roll out with taylor or even the read option would help us a ton
but hey, keep on pretending we are qb situation isnt as bad as it is
I actually think we already traded next year’s 7th to the Browns for Kessler. Also, I doubt they would take a seventh for Tyrod, what if Mayfield gets injured? The Browns have actually been in every game this year with the exception of the Chargers game. They are still in the wild card discussion.
The other two relevant questions are do we think this team wins a Super Bowl with Tyrod Taylor at QB this year and what would be his role going forward?
I say no and he may not even be on the team after this year. I’d rather roll with what we have this year and draft our guy next year.
(10-22-2018, 11:26 AM)Krayz_Jville_D Wrote: [ -> ](10-22-2018, 11:25 AM)JagsFanClubOfMD Wrote: [ -> ]I actually think we already traded next year’s 7th to the Browns for Kessler. Also, I doubt they would take a seventh for Tyrod, what if Mayfield gets injured? The Browns have actually been in every game this year with the exception of the Chargers game. They are still in the wild card discussion.
The other two relevant questions are do we think this team wins a Super Bowl with Tyrod Taylor at QB this year and what would be his role going forward?
I say no and he may not even be on the team after this year. I’d rather roll with what we have this year and draft our guy next year.
it's very possible next year there is no QB worth drafting in the 1st round
we could be stuck in this mess a long time because we refused to get involved in the kirk cousins or alex smith sweepstakes
and no he wouldnt get us to the superbowl, but taylor would MAYBE give us a chance at the playoffs by winning the division, but you are right, chances are that ship has sailed and we should probably just play it the rest the way and get our early draft pick so we can pick another bust
(10-22-2018, 11:28 AM)iHaunting Raven Wrote: [ -> ](10-22-2018, 11:26 AM)Krayz_Jville_D Wrote: [ -> ]it's very possible next year there is no QB worth drafting in the 1st round
we could be stuck in this mess a long time because we refused to get involved in the kirk cousins or alex smith sweepstakes
and no he wouldnt get us to the superbowl, but taylor would MAYBE give us a chance at the playoffs by winning the division, but you are right, chances are that ship has sailed and we should probably just play it the rest the way and get our early draft pick so we can pick another bust
Or because we thought it was smart to refuse to bring any real competition for Bortles, or to draft fragile Fournette over Mahomes or even Watson.
(10-22-2018, 10:41 AM)iHaunting Raven Wrote: [ -> ]Sign Matt Moore, what can we lose? Pretty sure he is better than Bortles.