10-30-2018, 12:49 PM
(10-30-2018, 09:14 AM)hb1148 Wrote: [ -> ](10-29-2018, 06:38 AM)JackCity Wrote: [ -> ]It's the "modern" part of the sentence that's unusual. A 3-4 isn't an innovative new scheme ready made for this era of football, it's fine if you have the pieces (like most defensive schemes) but it isn't modern.
You could say that about just about any traditional defense, like the 4-3 since it's been around since the 50s. In any case, since several teams use the 3-4 with great success it's perfectly workable in modern football.
Yeah that's what I said, it's fine if you have the pieces (like most defensive schemes) , it's just odd to call a 3-4 the "modern way to play defense", especially when the shift over the last 10 years is based around nickel and 4-2-5s.
Aside from that, I would enjoy seeing the jags in a 3-4 purely to see how it plays out. Blitz heavy defense are fun and with the talent we have on the back end you could get really creative.