01-15-2019, 08:17 PM
(01-15-2019, 06:25 PM)knarnn Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/zach_goodall/status/...89440?s=21
isn't the nfl minimum salary 'north of 6 figures' 6 figures is 100k.
(01-15-2019, 06:25 PM)knarnn Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/zach_goodall/status/...89440?s=21
(01-15-2019, 07:27 PM)shadowjag01 Wrote: [ -> ]Take note that almost every play on that video is 4th quarter garbage plays. I would love for him to be the one. But who knows.
(01-15-2019, 08:36 PM)ATLjag Wrote: [ -> ]He's a better QB than Tanner Lee, and will give Kessler good competition for the backup role. Not a Super Bowl move, but gives the backend roster a guy with developmental upside.
(01-15-2019, 08:17 PM)HandsomeRob86 Wrote: [ -> ]It's a reserve/futures contract. Basically he has a contract to show up for minicamp and offseason workouts. If they like him, they will sign him to a real contract before camp starts.(01-15-2019, 06:25 PM)knarnn Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/zach_goodall/status/...89440?s=21
isn't the nfl minimum salary 'north of 6 figures' 6 figures is 100k.
(01-15-2019, 09:28 PM)jaglyn Wrote: [ -> ]"Camp arm"
We're gonna say that now, but just watch: Come October or November, when our starting QB stinks it up, we're gonna be asking to give this guy a shot to start
(01-16-2019, 12:11 AM)The Eleventh Doctor Wrote: [ -> ](01-15-2019, 09:28 PM)jaglyn Wrote: [ -> ]"Camp arm"
We're gonna say that now, but just watch: Come October or November, when our starting QB stinks it up, we're gonna be asking to give this guy a shot to start
And three games later we'll be begging for Bortles back.
(01-15-2019, 11:13 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ](01-15-2019, 08:17 PM)HandsomeRob86 Wrote: [ -> ]isn't the nfl minimum salary 'north of 6 figures' 6 figures is 100k.It's a reserve/futures contract. Basically he has a contract to show up for minicamp and offseason workouts. If they like him, they will sign him to a real contract before camp starts.
Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk
(01-16-2019, 09:21 AM)Jags02 Wrote: [ -> ](01-15-2019, 11:13 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ]It's a reserve/futures contract. Basically he has a contract to show up for minicamp and offseason workouts. If they like him, they will sign him to a real contract before camp starts.
Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk
There's is no such thing as a contract to just show up for the OTAs. A reserve/futures contract means he's signed for the future, as in the 2019 season. There wouldn't be any new contract.
As for the minimum, the NFL minimum salary for rookies this season is $495,000, and he's still considered a rookie since he's only played in Preseason games to date. You'd have to be a 10+ year vet for your minimum salary to be north of six figures.
It's hard to judge him on those games since it was in Preseason garbage time vs 3rd and 4th stringers where he didn't appear to face any real pressure, however, it was clear that he's got a beautiful arc on his passes and at least has the ability to nail some deeper throws.
(01-16-2019, 12:19 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ](01-16-2019, 09:21 AM)Jags02 Wrote: [ -> ]There's is no such thing as a contract to just show up for the OTAs. A reserve/futures contract means he's signed for the future, as in the 2019 season. There wouldn't be any new contract.
As for the minimum, the NFL minimum salary for rookies this season is $495,000, and he's still considered a rookie since he's only played in Preseason games to date. You'd have to be a 10+ year vet for your minimum salary to be north of six figures.
It's hard to judge him on those games since it was in Preseason garbage time vs 3rd and 4th stringers where he didn't appear to face any real pressure, however, it was clear that he's got a beautiful arc on his passes and at least has the ability to nail some deeper throws.
Futures contracts often really do end up being merely an off-season addition - but they don’t have to be.
When the season ends (for any teams not continuing in the postseason) front offices begin a flurry of futures deals. Players on any team’s practice squad as well as free agents not currently signed are all fair game. And most importantly - none of these deals count against your 53. So you are adding against your 90 man offseason roster count. For that reason - many of these players don’t outlast camp cuts.
To put this in perspective - NFL Teams have collectively signed 273 players to futures deals since the regular season ended. This happens every year.
The VAST majority of those players are being treated as “camp invites.” Most of them will not survive cuts.
Maybe the Jags see more in this QBs future than camp, maybe not.
(01-16-2019, 08:03 PM)Jags02 Wrote: [ -> ](01-16-2019, 12:19 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]Futures contracts often really do end up being merely an off-season addition - but they don’t have to be.
When the season ends (for any teams not continuing in the postseason) front offices begin a flurry of futures deals. Players on any team’s practice squad as well as free agents not currently signed are all fair game. And most importantly - none of these deals count against your 53. So you are adding against your 90 man offseason roster count. For that reason - many of these players don’t outlast camp cuts.
To put this in perspective - NFL Teams have collectively signed 273 players to futures deals since the regular season ended. This happens every year.
The VAST majority of those players are being treated as “camp invites.” Most of them will not survive cuts.
Maybe the Jags see more in this QBs future than camp, maybe not.
Sure these players often fail to make it through the roster cuts, but that's not what we were talking about. The post I replied to was suggesting that if he made it he'd get a new contract. That's simply not the case. Also, regarding the guys who often get cut, you don't see that happen all that much with players on a futures contract making north of six figures.
(01-16-2019, 11:28 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]He can't be any worse than Kessler was last year, can he?
(01-16-2019, 08:16 PM)jessepeck1213 Wrote: [ -> ]Guy looks like he has some talent to play with.