Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Texas has discovered 95,000 non citizens on voter rolls
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
This is the real crisis at the border.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/texas-s...have-voted
And there are a couple hundred thousand in California. I’m sure there are other states as well but the Commission was threatened and obstructed with partisan infighting so it was forced to collapse before the investigation could even get knee deep.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/03/us/po...ssion.html
Seriously, are you telling me they can't vote?  I thought us Dems had a great 2020 election plan up until now ....

[Image: _103924171_a64b9084-ee3f-42d3-8014-8083d57d9b73.jpg]
Bogus

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/29/us/te...e=Homepage

A claim made last week by the Texas secretary of state — that 95,000 registered voters had a citizenship status that could not be determined — appeared to fall apart on Tuesday when local election officials said many of the people were known to be United States citizens.
(01-30-2019, 07:13 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]Bogus

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/29/us/te...e=Homepage

A claim made last week by the Texas secretary of state — that 95,000 registered voters had a citizenship status that could not be determined — appeared to fall apart on Tuesday when local election officials said many of the people were known to be United States citizens.

You are right. The NYT is bogus.
(01-30-2019, 07:13 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]Bogus

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/29/us/te...e=Homepage

A claim made last week by the Texas secretary of state — that 95,000 registered voters had a citizenship status that could not be determined — appeared to fall apart on Tuesday when local election officials said many of the people were known to be United States citizens.
This story and your post are misleading. Just like many of the other voter fraud investigations, some errors were discovered that showed double counts and even actual citizens on the inelegible list. Errors happen when humans are involved. Even by your own story,  those errors have accounted for 400 out of 95,000 so far. I'm sorry but .42% does not equate to "falling apart." Fraudulent voters are fraudulent voters are fraudulent.
The announcement from the Texas Sec of State was based on weak matching of names and identifying information. It's grounds for a deeper investigation into those people. We'll see how many actually turn out to be non citizens that registered to vote. These kinds of sweeps have been done before, and often only about 1% of the flagged registrations turn out to be illegal.
(01-30-2019, 12:28 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]The announcement from the Texas Sec of State was based on weak matching of names and identifying information.  It's grounds for a deeper investigation into those people.  We'll see how many actually turn out to be non citizens that registered to vote.  These kinds of sweeps have been done before, and often only about 1% of the flagged registrations turn out to be illegal.
It would be interesting if the investigations were ever allowed to run the course without lawsuits and bureaucratic interference. I'm certain we all are aware that fraudulent voting is taking place in certain states but to what extent is a mystery. The is a large contingency that is really against voter IDs and any strong finding would really enforce the need for some type of federal ID voter verification. If we are honest, voting procedures and technology in the United States are stuck in the stone age. The reason why may be intereseting.
Well, add Pennsylvania to the group.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opini...ud-is-real