Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Texas has discovered 95,000 non citizens on voter rolls

#1

This is the real crisis at the border.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/texas-s...have-voted
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2
(This post was last modified: 01-28-2019, 02:22 PM by B2hibry.)

And there are a couple hundred thousand in California. I’m sure there are other states as well but the Commission was threatened and obstructed with partisan infighting so it was forced to collapse before the investigation could even get knee deep.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/03/us/po...ssion.html
[Image: Ben-Roethlisberger_Lerentee-McCary-Sack_...ayoffs.jpg]
Reply

#3
(This post was last modified: 01-28-2019, 12:26 PM by HURRICANE!!!.)

Seriously, are you telling me they can't vote?  I thought us Dems had a great 2020 election plan up until now ....

[Image: _103924171_a64b9084-ee3f-42d3-8014-8083d57d9b73.jpg]
Reply

#4

Bogus

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/29/us/te...e=Homepage

A claim made last week by the Texas secretary of state — that 95,000 registered voters had a citizenship status that could not be determined — appeared to fall apart on Tuesday when local election officials said many of the people were known to be United States citizens.
Reply

#5

(01-30-2019, 07:13 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: Bogus

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/29/us/te...e=Homepage

A claim made last week by the Texas secretary of state — that 95,000 registered voters had a citizenship status that could not be determined — appeared to fall apart on Tuesday when local election officials said many of the people were known to be United States citizens.

You are right. The NYT is bogus.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

(01-30-2019, 07:13 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: Bogus

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/29/us/te...e=Homepage

A claim made last week by the Texas secretary of state — that 95,000 registered voters had a citizenship status that could not be determined — appeared to fall apart on Tuesday when local election officials said many of the people were known to be United States citizens.
This story and your post are misleading. Just like many of the other voter fraud investigations, some errors were discovered that showed double counts and even actual citizens on the inelegible list. Errors happen when humans are involved. Even by your own story,  those errors have accounted for 400 out of 95,000 so far. I'm sorry but .42% does not equate to "falling apart." Fraudulent voters are fraudulent voters are fraudulent.
[Image: Ben-Roethlisberger_Lerentee-McCary-Sack_...ayoffs.jpg]
Reply

#7

The announcement from the Texas Sec of State was based on weak matching of names and identifying information. It's grounds for a deeper investigation into those people. We'll see how many actually turn out to be non citizens that registered to vote. These kinds of sweeps have been done before, and often only about 1% of the flagged registrations turn out to be illegal.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

#8

(01-30-2019, 12:28 PM)mikesez Wrote: The announcement from the Texas Sec of State was based on weak matching of names and identifying information.  It's grounds for a deeper investigation into those people.  We'll see how many actually turn out to be non citizens that registered to vote.  These kinds of sweeps have been done before, and often only about 1% of the flagged registrations turn out to be illegal.
It would be interesting if the investigations were ever allowed to run the course without lawsuits and bureaucratic interference. I'm certain we all are aware that fraudulent voting is taking place in certain states but to what extent is a mystery. The is a large contingency that is really against voter IDs and any strong finding would really enforce the need for some type of federal ID voter verification. If we are honest, voting procedures and technology in the United States are stuck in the stone age. The reason why may be intereseting.
[Image: Ben-Roethlisberger_Lerentee-McCary-Sack_...ayoffs.jpg]
Reply

#9

Well, add Pennsylvania to the group.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opini...ud-is-real
[Image: Ben-Roethlisberger_Lerentee-McCary-Sack_...ayoffs.jpg]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!





Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!