Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

(11-30-2020, 05:31 PM)SamusAranX Wrote: [ -> ]I am not opposed to Baalke. He helped build the 49ers into a contender, and I don't think he was here long enough to be "fruit of the poisonous tree".

(11-30-2020, 05:51 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-30-2020, 05:31 PM)SamusAranX Wrote: [ -> ]I am not opposed to Baalke. He helped build the 49ers into a contender, and I don't think he was here long enough to be "fruit of the poisonous tree".

#cleansweep

(11-30-2020, 09:41 PM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not even entertaining the thought of keeping Baalke.

(12-01-2020, 01:28 AM)maddenisfordorks Wrote: [ -> ]Some of us need to face the fact we may be dead before the Jags become a .500 ball club.

(11-30-2020, 03:22 PM)Dimson Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-30-2020, 03:18 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]The Jags message board would have certainly drafted better than Caldwel and Gene Smith these last 10+ years.

That would be awesome if we got to run the draft.

(11-30-2020, 03:42 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]We would have to get someone neutral to read off the pick because if not, it would go something like this:

"With their 1st pick of the 2021 NFL Draft, the Jacksonville Jaguars forum makes the most idiotic short-sighted selection in the history of the team. Some of us tried to talk sense into the fanboys with stars in their eyes, but noOoOoo, they had to go with meaningless numbers on a low ceiling player. *sigh* But anyway..."

(12-01-2020, 01:28 AM)maddenisfordorks Wrote: [ -> ]Some of us need to face the fact we may be dead before the Jags become a .500 ball club.

(11-30-2020, 05:51 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-30-2020, 05:31 PM)SamusAranX Wrote: [ -> ]I am not opposed to Baalke. He helped build the 49ers into a contender, and I don't think he was here long enough to be "fruit of the poisonous tree".

#cleansweep

(12-01-2020, 04:25 PM)SamusAranX Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-30-2020, 05:51 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]#cleansweep

So even thought he has a track record of success, and has only been here a short time, he shouldn’t be considered at all? I’m not directly advocating for him, but I won’t have a meltdown if he ends being the GM either.

(12-01-2020, 04:55 PM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-01-2020, 04:25 PM)SamusAranX Wrote: [ -> ]So even thought he has a track record of success, and has only been here a short time, he shouldn’t be considered at all? I’m not directly advocating for him, but I won’t have a meltdown if he ends being the GM either.

I think Baalke's success with the 9ers was pretty minimal. He was fired in Jan 2017. Their rebirth under Jimmy G and the elite D started after his departure.
He had his hands in the good Jim Harbaugh/Greg Roman/Kap years... but that was pretty short lived. By 2015 4 years after he was hired they were trash. And Baalke hired Tomsula and Chip Kelly as successors to Harbaugh.

Personally... I'm in the "no retread" category of fans.
Give me an up and comer, some new blood. Not some GM that has had some mild success yet ended up not panning out elsewhere.

(12-01-2020, 04:25 PM)SamusAranX Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-30-2020, 05:51 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]#cleansweep

So even thought he has a track record of success, and has only been here a short time, he shouldn’t be considered at all? I’m not directly advocating for him, but I won’t have a meltdown if he ends being the GM either.

(12-01-2020, 05:09 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-01-2020, 04:25 PM)SamusAranX Wrote: [ -> ]So even thought he has a track record of success, and has only been here a short time, he shouldn’t be considered at all? I’m not directly advocating for him, but I won’t have a meltdown if he ends being the GM either.

Nope, everybody out of the pool.

(12-01-2020, 10:50 PM)Senor Fantastico Wrote: [ -> ]Only guy I'd even consider keeping is Keenan.

(12-02-2020, 10:06 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]Dorsey is apparently linked to Bienemy.

Not sure how I feel about that. Love Bienemy but not a fan of Dorsey.