Exactly. The same sort of thing that would have you declaring there being widespread voter fraud if it was democrat voter.
I imagine there was probably more pro Trump fraud in the last election due to his rhetoric beforehand.
Lol. Dude. I would never think that voter fraud was widespread without the numbers being so off. No story would surprise me when it came to the election. I think Republicans would try to cheat, too. They just don't have the same capacity to shape the narrative.
"The Real Big Lie seeks to suppress the fact that all 29 of the lawsuits over the presidential election that addressed the integrity or constitutionality of the electoral counting process were left un-adjudicated. They were not heard for process reasons: late filing, lack of time to hear them, the wrong defendant, the procedural finding that challenges had to begin at the lowest courts and wend their way upwards, or lack of standing to hear the cases. Most of these objections were spurious and cowardly. The fact is, the judiciary abdicated its duty as a coequal branch of American government. It presumably did so for political reasons as overturning a presidential election result would indeed have been extremely controversial."
https://donsurber.blogspot.com/2021/05/t...sumes.html
https://justthenews.com/accountability/s...judges-feb
I'm asking a friend of mine, who is a network engineer, about the legitimacy of the claims of county officials that this would compromise their networks. As far as I can tell, the only purpose the routers would serve is to show if the machines where online at the time and where the data was going if that turns out to be the case. Seems worthy of investigation.
(05-24-2021, 04:11 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]https://justthenews.com/accountability/s...judges-feb
I'm asking a friend of mine, who is a network engineer, about the legitimacy of the claims of county officials that this would compromise their networks. As far as I can tell, the only purpose the routers would serve is to show if the machines where online at the time and where the data was going if that turns out to be the case. Seems worthy of investigation.
The routers, depending on the type and model could be highly sensitive up to the point of being "classified material". It would be one thing if the routers were used solely for election purposes. It's another thing if they handled other types of traffic. IF they are turned over as evidence they would need to be handled with the upmost security practices. Many people don't understand just how much valuable information can be obtained from examining certain kinds of routers.
I used to be a network engineer, but I've forgotten most of it. I get that they contain sensitive information, but I can almost guarantee they already outsource that information to a different company. I don't get why it would be that difficult to get a crew from Cyber Ninjas that has clearance to look at them. These companies deal with sensitive information all the time.
(05-24-2021, 04:11 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]https://justthenews.com/accountability/s...judges-feb
I'm asking a friend of mine, who is a network engineer, about the legitimacy of the claims of county officials that this would compromise their networks. As far as I can tell, the only purpose the routers would serve is to show if the machines where online at the time and where the data was going if that turns out to be the case. Seems worthy of investigation.
(05-24-2021, 04:26 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ] (05-24-2021, 04:11 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]https://justthenews.com/accountability/s...judges-feb
I'm asking a friend of mine, who is a network engineer, about the legitimacy of the claims of county officials that this would compromise their networks. As far as I can tell, the only purpose the routers would serve is to show if the machines where online at the time and where the data was going if that turns out to be the case. Seems worthy of investigation.
The routers, depending on the type and model could be highly sensitive up to the point of being "classified material". It would be one thing if the routers were used solely for election purposes. It's another thing if they handled other types of traffic. IF they are turned over as evidence they would need to be handled with the upmost security practices. Many people don't understand just how much valuable information can be obtained from examining certain kinds of routers.
The router doesn't contain any sensitive data. The router doesn't store packet data. At most you could show routing tables, from and to ip addresses, and any firewall rules. You aren't going to have packet level data though, so there is no chance of any sensitive data about people being leaked. You could discover some potential undercover person connecting to their network or something like that but that would be highly suspect. These are not live routers, they just want to prove the traffic that was flowing went through them.
Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
John Fredericks says Georgia officials are alleging that up to 30,000 of the ballots are fraudulent.
“Six affidavits now, we had four, now it’s six. Six affidavits of veteran election officials are alleging that up to 30,000 of these 147 [thousand] ballots are fake,” said Fredericks. “Somebody printed them up on a machine and ran them through the vote counting machines. They’re not real. They’re not attached to anybody.” Another revelation was that the ballots were unfolded and printed on a different paper than the regular absentee ballots, according to Fredericks.
“Number one, they’re on different paper. What kind of paper are they on? Why isn’t it the same paper that everything else is on? Number two, they’re not folded. Well, what do you mean they’re not folded? In order to get an absentee ballot, you have to get it in the mail. Which means that the Department of Elections in Georgia machine folded the ballot, you can’t have a ballot in an envelope that you mail back, or dropbox back, that’s not folded. You either got it folded, or you send it back folded, or both with an envelope. So why aren’t they folded?”
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/30...-not-real/
When we have a "President" that obviously has a difficult time communicating with the press and the general public, I find it hard to believe that he won in a "landslide" with more votes than Obama.
When a supposedly "moderate" democrat "President" signs off on the far left agenda, I have a difficult time believing that he won in a "landslide".
I get the "anyone but Trump" voters, there were probably many.... but not that many.
It should be pretty obvious to anybody watching without the partisan blinders on that Joe Biden is not the one in control. The massive tax hikes being proposed, the crisis at the border and the out of control inflation that we are seeing right now should be concerning to sane people. Throw in the new "woke" culture being crammed down our throats and it's disgusting.
In just a few short months this administration regime has thrown us on a wild path towards being a third world country.
(05-29-2021, 07:11 PM)Ronster Wrote: [ -> ]“Smoking gun” proving fraud in NH
https://www.oann.com/n-h-voter-integrity...ion-fraud/
(05-30-2021, 10:22 PM)KodiakJag Wrote: [ -> ] (05-29-2021, 07:11 PM)Ronster Wrote: [ -> ]“Smoking gun” proving fraud in NH
https://www.oann.com/n-h-voter-integrity...ion-fraud/
Finally, “proof.”
Now let’s see how far this gets in the courts.
The whole audit is a setup for the deep state and they are still finding things that prove the machines and ballots were design to take votes from Republicans.
The fat slob and his friend are deep state plants that have ties to left wing groups and I think I saw one was paid with Soros money at some point.
They aren't even doing a forensic audit, so they won't find much fraud. This guy who deleted the card data also invited the person who sold the county the machines to the audit.
It's a clown show but it is still producing results.
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk