If you ever questioned PFF's grading on linemen, Cann giving up a sack and grading out above his peers should give you food for additional thought.
(08-15-2021, 03:49 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]If you ever questioned PFF's grading on linemen, Cann giving up a sack and grading out above his peers should give you food for additional thought.
Lol, well said.
The only people who can accurately grade a player are his coaches. They're the only ones who know if the player carried out his assignment or not.
My eyes told me that Hyde was bad, whiffing on a pass pro for a sack and lack of any burst in his 2 runs. Glad to see a poor grade to confirm my eyes.
I am not impressed with any of the RBs on the roster outside of Robinson and Etienne. I am hoping a camp cut can improve the bottom of this position, and Meyer forgets that Hyde played for him at Ohio State.
Idk how the grades work because giving up a sack should be pretty harsh, but Cann did have a pretty good game except the first play especially in the run game he was dominant.
Just because a player gets a minus on one play doesn't me he cannot get a plus on every other play. I generally agree that their exercise has some error range without know perfectly who has what assignment, but their methodology is reasonable within their time contraints without say training a massive supercomputer to process every play. But they are only part of the picture. The Jaguars and others should not completely assess a player based on just on a few stats or calculations.