Many give PFF flack but I find them much more accurate then inaccurate:

Offensive grades:

https://twitter.com/_John_Shipley/status...99936?s=20

Defensive Grades:

https://twitter.com/_John_Shipley/status...00546?s=20

---

If you ever questioned PFF's grading on linemen, Cann giving up a sack and grading out above his peers should give you food for additional thought.

---

If you ever questioned PFF's grading on linemen, Cann giving up a sack and grading out above his peers should give you food for additional thought.

Lol, well said.

---

https://twitter.com/QuazDaMotor/status/1...77511?s=19

---

The only people who can accurately grade a player are his coaches. They're the only ones who know if the player carried out his assignment or not.

---

My eyes told me that Hyde was bad, whiffing on a pass pro for a sack and lack of any burst in his 2 runs. Glad to see a poor grade to confirm my eyes.

I am not impressed with any of the RBs on the roster outside of Robinson and Etienne. I am hoping a camp cut can improve the bottom of this position, and Meyer forgets that Hyde played for him at Ohio State.

---

Wow Cann...

---

Idk how the grades work because giving up a sack should be pretty harsh, but Cann did have a pretty good game except the first play especially in the run game he was dominant.

---

[img]blob:https://www.duvalpride.com/1a8a2498-9833-4b7d-8cc7-5e45aa36d9f6[/img][img=648x560]blob:https://www.duvalpride.com/cfd7a344-8206-4fed-a4c4-6536e150b1a7[/img]

Just because a player gets a minus on one play doesn't me he cannot get a plus on every other play. I generally agree that their exercise has some error range without know perfectly who has what assignment, but their methodology is reasonable within their time contraints without say training a massive supercomputer to process every play. But they are only part of the picture. The Jaguars and others should not completely assess a player based on just on a few stats or calculations.

---