(01-13-2022, 06:51 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]USA Today Deletes Tweet on How Not All Pedophiles Abuse Kids (mediaite.com)
Well, "progressives" do say they want to empty the prisons.
USA Today is CNN's print cousin. They've gone so far left that if it weren't for airports and hotels handing out their garbage for free, they would be defunct.
![[Image: Screen-Shot-2022-01-12-at-9.30.47-AM.jpg]](https://am11.mediaite.com/med/cnt/uploads/2022/01/Screen-Shot-2022-01-12-at-9.30.47-AM.jpg)
I am speechless. I cannot imagine anyone except a pedophile even attempting to float that idea.
That's not really a defense. That's just a clarification.
I know a guy who downloaded and distributed that stuff. I only know because the feds caught him and convicted him of it. You would have had no idea, he wasn't weird or anything. He didn't abuse anyone, but he might have eventually. He was probably abused when he was a kid. He's going to be in a halfway house of sorts for the rest of his life. Good, I say.
(01-13-2022, 07:42 PM)copycat Wrote: [ -> ] (01-13-2022, 06:51 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]USA Today Deletes Tweet on How Not All Pedophiles Abuse Kids (mediaite.com)
Well, "progressives" do say they want to empty the prisons.
USA Today is CNN's print cousin. They've gone so far left that if it weren't for airports and hotels handing out their garbage for free, they would be defunct.
I am speechless. I cannot imagine anyone except a pedophile even attempting to float that idea.
There have been multiple tweets and stories like this. They are trying to make it acceptable now for some reason. Maybe they are afraid of Maxwell talking or something.
Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
(01-13-2022, 07:46 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]That's not really a defense. That's just a clarification.
I know a guy who downloaded and distributed that stuff. I only know because the feds caught him and convicted him of it. You would have had no idea, he wasn't weird or anything. He didn't abuse anyone, but he might have eventually. He was probably abused when he was a kid. He's going to be in a halfway house of sorts for the rest of his life. Good, I say.
If you’re downloading and distributing the stuff, you’re supporting and encouraging the abuse of children.
Good gawd. Seriously? Do the rest of the left really buy this [BLEEP]?
(01-13-2022, 07:46 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]That's not really a defense. That's just a clarification.
I know a guy who downloaded and distributed that stuff. I only know because the feds caught him and convicted him of it. You would have had no idea, he wasn't weird or anything. He didn't abuse anyone, but he might have eventually. He was probably abused when he was a kid. He's going to be in a halfway house of sorts for the rest of his life. Good, I say.
He wasn’t weird at all. He just likes to download images of children. What the actual [BLEEP]? I know you like to take the inarguable sides of things like in that move “A perfect murder”. But this is just asinine. Anyone that looks at children in that way is a [BLEEP]. Anyone defending it is also one. Don’t make excuses. Don’t try to be the smartest man in the room. Take a side. This “I’m a Republican”….but… [BLEEP] has gone too far.
(01-13-2022, 07:57 PM)Jags Wrote: [ -> ]Good gawd. Seriously? Do the rest of the left really buy this [BLEEP]?
It's the next step with all the LGBQ stuff. They won't openly admit it yet, but gay men especially need to groom young boys before nature takes over.
Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
(01-13-2022, 07:52 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: [ -> ] (01-13-2022, 07:46 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]That's not really a defense. That's just a clarification.
I know a guy who downloaded and distributed that stuff. I only know because the feds caught him and convicted him of it. You would have had no idea, he wasn't weird or anything. He didn't abuse anyone, but he might have eventually. He was probably abused when he was a kid. He's going to be in a halfway house of sorts for the rest of his life. Good, I say.
If you’re downloading and distributing the stuff, you’re supporting and encouraging the abuse of children.
Yes. Just a softer form of trafficking.
(01-13-2022, 08:14 PM)NewJagsCity Wrote: [ -> ] (01-13-2022, 07:52 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: [ -> ]If you’re downloading and distributing the stuff, you’re supporting and encouraging the abuse of children.
Yes. Just a softer form of trafficking.
Soft, my [BLEEP]. It’s [BLEEP] to be even do it in the first place.
(01-13-2022, 07:46 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]That's not really a defense. That's just a clarification.
I know a guy who downloaded and distributed that stuff. I only know because the feds caught him and convicted him of it. You would have had no idea, he wasn't weird or anything. He didn't abuse anyone, but he might have eventually. He was probably abused when he was a kid. He's going to be in a halfway house of sorts for the rest of his life. Good, I say.
He wasn't weird?!
Kind of like how Ted Bundy was such a nice guy? Because that's what everyone said about him, to include his parents who had no clue he was a sociopath and a murderer until he was arrested and the truth started to come out.
The guy you knew 100% abused everyone whose photos he downloaded as well as the filth/people he distributed it to who in turn 100% abused those victims again. Supply and demand.
Your moral compass is way off course if you think that guy was "not weird." And don't bother trying to argue the point. It will just make you look worse than you already do. If you found out he downloaded pictures of your kids would you be so blase about it?
(01-13-2022, 08:29 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ] (01-13-2022, 07:46 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]That's not really a defense. That's just a clarification.
I know a guy who downloaded and distributed that stuff. I only know because the feds caught him and convicted him of it. You would have had no idea, he wasn't weird or anything. He didn't abuse anyone, but he might have eventually. He was probably abused when he was a kid. He's going to be in a halfway house of sorts for the rest of his life. Good, I say.
He wasn't weird?!
Kind of like how Ted Bundy was such a nice guy? Because that's what everyone said about him, to include his parents who had no clue he was a sociopath and a murderer until he was arrested and the truth started to come out.
The guy you knew 100% abused everyone whose photos he downloaded as well as the filth/people he distributed it to who in turn 100% abused those victims again. Supply and demand.
Your moral compass is way off course if you think that guy was "not weird." And don't bother trying to argue the point. It will just make you look worse than you already do. If you found out he downloaded pictures of your kids would you be so blase about it?
Mike is a hardcore democrat no matter what he tries to [BLEEP] in our ears/eyes. I can totally believe he thinks this is “ok”.
(01-13-2022, 08:35 PM)Jags Wrote: [ -> ] (01-13-2022, 08:29 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]He wasn't weird?!
Kind of like how Ted Bundy was such a nice guy? Because that's what everyone said about him, to include his parents who had no clue he was a sociopath and a murderer until he was arrested and the truth started to come out.
The guy you knew 100% abused everyone whose photos he downloaded as well as the filth/people he distributed it to who in turn 100% abused those victims again. Supply and demand.
Your moral compass is way off course if you think that guy was "not weird." And don't bother trying to argue the point. It will just make you look worse than you already do. If you found out he downloaded pictures of your kids would you be so blase about it?
Mike is a hardcore democrat no matter what he tries to [BLEEP] in our ears/eyes. I can totally believe he thinks this is “ok”.
People who defend something like what he did have deeper issues than the party they align with politically. Pedophiles aren't automatically democrats anymore than Christians are automatically conservatives.
(01-13-2022, 08:55 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ] (01-13-2022, 08:35 PM)Jags Wrote: [ -> ]Mike is a hardcore democrat no matter what he tries to [BLEEP] in our ears/eyes. I can totally believe he thinks this is “ok”.
People who defend something like what he did have deeper issues than the party they align with politically. Pedophiles aren't automatically democrats anymore than Christians are automatically conservatives.
I’ll be open minded enough to agree with that. But can we all agree that Mikesez is an idiot?
I definitely did not say it was OK.
I said no one knew or thought he was weird. I mean everyone's a little weird, of course, but this guy's weirdness was in the normal range. He was not weird around kids. Didn't seem attracted to them at all. Had a wife. She seemed normal too. Both of them were really nice.
His wife filed for divorce as soon as she could and made sure he would never see their kids again. And he won't, not until they're 18 anyhow.
You guys really love rushing to conclusions about people. He lost his wife, his kids, and all of his friends and he'll be on parole basically for the rest of his life, and I think that's a good thing.
I don't condone his online activity at all. But it is different from actually touching kids. Which he did not do, as far as we know today.
(01-13-2022, 09:01 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]I definitely did not say it was OK.
I said no one knew or thought he was weird. I mean everyone's a little weird, of course, but this guy's weirdness was in the normal range. He was not weird around kids. Didn't seem attracted to them at all. Had a wife. She seemed normal too. Both of them were really nice.
His wife filed for divorce as soon as she could and made sure he would never see their kids again. And he won't, not until they're 18 anyhow.
You guys really love rushing to conclusions about people. He lost his wife, his kids, and all of his friends and he'll be on parole basically for the rest of his life, and I think that's a good thing.
I don't condone his online activity at all. But it is different from actually touching kids. Which he did not do, as far as we know today.
You’re [BLEEP] up. Nothing about it is ok or not “as bad”.
You mean to tell me this wouldn’t have led to him actually doing something? That is unless he actually did. So he is “not that bad” until he got to that point? Then he would be, but let’s see how it plays out? [BLEEP] that
(01-13-2022, 09:03 PM)Jags Wrote: [ -> ] (01-13-2022, 09:01 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]I definitely did not say it was OK.
I said no one knew or thought he was weird. I mean everyone's a little weird, of course, but this guy's weirdness was in the normal range. He was not weird around kids. Didn't seem attracted to them at all. Had a wife. She seemed normal too. Both of them were really nice.
His wife filed for divorce as soon as she could and made sure he would never see their kids again. And he won't, not until they're 18 anyhow.
You guys really love rushing to conclusions about people. He lost his wife, his kids, and all of his friends and he'll be on parole basically for the rest of his life, and I think that's a good thing.
I don't condone his online activity at all. But it is different from actually touching kids. Which he did not do, as far as we know today.
You’re [BLEEP] up. Nothing about it is ok or not “as bad”.
Shame on you for rushing to conclusions about a dealer of kiddie porn and the people who defend them.
/sarcasm
(01-13-2022, 09:01 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]I definitely did not say it was OK.
I said no one knew or thought he was weird. I mean everyone's a little weird, of course, but this guy's weirdness was in the normal range. He was not weird around kids. Didn't seem attracted to them at all. Had a wife. She seemed normal too. Both of them were really nice.
His wife filed for divorce as soon as she could and made sure he would never see their kids again. And he won't, not until they're 18 anyhow.
You guys really love rushing to conclusions about people. He lost his wife, his kids, and all of his friends and he'll be on parole basically for the rest of his life, and I think that's a good thing.
I don't condone his online activity at all. But it is different from actually touching kids. Which he did not do, as far as we know today.
The fact that you can't see how this is not any damn different is so [BLEEP] wrong. It does not matter whether he touched them or not. They were abused just the same. He should be in prison.
It's like saying that Maxwell lady was not as bad as Epstein because she didn't sleep with the girls she trafficked. That we know of.
(01-13-2022, 08:57 PM)Jags Wrote: [ -> ] (01-13-2022, 08:55 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]People who defend something like what he did have deeper issues than the party they align with politically. Pedophiles aren't automatically democrats anymore than Christians are automatically conservatives.
I’ll be open minded enough to agree with that. But can we all agree that Mikesez is an idiot?
If we were in the same city/state I'd say let's drink to that.
(01-13-2022, 09:03 PM)Jags Wrote: [ -> ] (01-13-2022, 09:01 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]I definitely did not say it was OK.
I said no one knew or thought he was weird. I mean everyone's a little weird, of course, but this guy's weirdness was in the normal range. He was not weird around kids. Didn't seem attracted to them at all. Had a wife. She seemed normal too. Both of them were really nice.
His wife filed for divorce as soon as she could and made sure he would never see their kids again. And he won't, not until they're 18 anyhow.
You guys really love rushing to conclusions about people. He lost his wife, his kids, and all of his friends and he'll be on parole basically for the rest of his life, and I think that's a good thing.
I don't condone his online activity at all. But it is different from actually touching kids. Which he did not do, as far as we know today.
You’re [BLEEP] up. Nothing about it is ok or not “as bad”.
You mean to tell me this wouldn’t have led to him actually doing something? That is unless he actually did. So he is “not that bad” until he got to that point? Then he would be, but let’s see how it plays out? [BLEEP] that
I didn't say it was not as bad.
Nor did I say it was ok.
I just said it's different.
We should be aware of the difference. We should be aware that the number of pedophiles out there is greater than the number of abused kids. It's a bigger problem than most realize.
(01-13-2022, 09:14 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (01-13-2022, 09:03 PM)Jags Wrote: [ -> ]You’re [BLEEP] up. Nothing about it is ok or not “as bad”.
You mean to tell me this wouldn’t have led to him actually doing something? That is unless he actually did. So he is “not that bad” until he got to that point? Then he would be, but let’s see how it plays out? [BLEEP] that
I didn't say it was not as bad.
Nor did I say it was ok.
I just said it's different.
We should be aware of the difference. We should be aware that the number of pedophiles out there is greater than the number of abused kids. It's a bigger problem than most realize.
You’re a lost cause.
Part of the tweet also says that not all people that abuse kids are pedophiles. Do you agree with that?