Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

(02-17-2022, 05:27 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-17-2022, 10:45 AM)NewJagsCity Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe we can all get together and take a group IQ test.  Playing with blocks can be fun!

Count me in as someone who couldn't care less about IQ scores. My cousin is a legit genius but has no common sense. It's not impressive. 

I prefer people who are genuine. I may not agree with 99.99% of what Ronster says but we all know where he stands on everything.

Descartes said everyone has common sense but that an enlightened skeptic, such as himself, does not rely on their own common sense when seeking after deeper or higher truths.

Also, as I've already said, you're confusing a lack of nuance with authenticity.

Lol.

https://youtu.be/O2KhiDfqeLI

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

(02-15-2022, 05:11 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-15-2022, 04:32 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]Why do you guys have such a hard time with Mike?  I don't get it.

Because direct evidence is there to support the claim that his then candidate's (Hillary) campaign not only illegally spied on the presidential candidate who was her opponent (Trump), and it continued even after he was a sitting president.  The fact that the MSM here in the US largely ignores this should be disturbing to all.  Why is it only being reported by right-leaning media here in the US and a few select over-seas media outlets?

Beyond the usual right wing website conspiracy theories, there's absolutely no evidence to support those claims. The main stream media is not ignoring it, in fact they are debunking the claims on a pretty regular basis. See below for a few examples.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasrei...explained/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/...ent-trump/
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/20...ion-claim/
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/02/...use-spying
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/14/politics/...index.html

The Alfa Bank thing was incorrect information, but Hillary's people didn't know it was incorrect at the time. They were really desperate to bolster the Russia narrative and we're seeing what would stick.

But let's not insinuate that this means the entire Mueller investigation was based on those lies. What became the Mueller investigation started in mid 2016, before all this. If Trump had lost, the investigation would have wound down and we would have heard very little about it. Trump winning meant the investigation had to be spun off to a special counsel which is a very public process.

If Hillary had won, there would have been a special counsel appointed to continue the investigation of the irregularities in her campaign.

Russell Brand is a right-wing conspiracy theorist?

(02-19-2022, 12:10 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]Russell Brand is a right-wing conspiracy theorist?

He's nutty enough to be one.

Anyone who declares themselves as a relatively liberal and centrist person politically are typically deemed as a nutter by either side. Jesse Ventura is another guy that comes to mind. They're so damn centered politically that neither side really wants anything to do with them because they're actually a major believer in injecting something into politics that politicians cannot stand.

Honesty. Integrity. Morals. Less Geopolitical interference. Less Big Government getting in your way on a daily basis. We can't have that in today's political arena. It's not allowed. It's not possible. I mean, eventually? It'll be possible. Once we've allowed the actual nutters in charge to blow us all to hell during WWIII. It's a shame really.

We, the people. We allowed this clear cut Plutocracy to infest our Democracy. Such a shame.