04-21-2022, 05:13 PM
(04-21-2022, 04:05 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]Look at the numbers, dude. They don't make sense.
They make sense if you look here:
https://twitter.com/realLizUSA/status/15...6149417984
(04-21-2022, 04:05 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]Look at the numbers, dude. They don't make sense.
(04-21-2022, 07:17 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ](04-21-2022, 05:04 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]What did the person telling you present as evidence?
The fact that they actually produced, distributed, and counted ballots?
(04-21-2022, 11:04 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ](04-21-2022, 07:17 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]The fact that they actually produced, distributed, and counted ballots?
Right, right, right. And you saw each one, validated chain of custody, and vouch for the integrity of each person involved. Or you just believed what you were told?
(04-22-2022, 08:51 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]What if those people are old? What if they don't speak English as their primary language?
(04-21-2022, 10:15 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]Oy vey
(04-22-2022, 10:00 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ](04-22-2022, 08:51 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]What if those people are old? What if they don't speak English as their primary language?
Enough time has passed that significant numbers of people have forgotten which method they used to vote.
People who sincerely thought there were provable problems with the vote count could have embarked on this project the week or the month of the election when memories were fresh.
We have to presume that some did, and that those people failed to find anything.
(04-22-2022, 09:23 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ](04-22-2022, 10:00 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Enough time has passed that significant numbers of people have forgotten which method they used to vote.
People who sincerely thought there were provable problems with the vote count could have embarked on this project the week or the month of the election when memories were fresh.
We have to presume that some did, and that those people failed to find anything.
Lol, do we? We need to presume that some people looked into it and didn't find anything. There is video after video of people dumping ballots. There's verifiable track record of corporate money being used to redirect oversight of voting procedures that resulted in staggering changes to the vote total in 6 key swing states. There's bragging coming from the media and the establishment in the form of "WE DID IT," as it pertains to the ousting of Trump. There's proof that the FBI aided and encouraged the protests of January 6th to go further than necessary, and a track record of them persecuting all Trump supporters. You really think this group is doing outstanding investigations into the integrity of the vote? The election numbers are staggeringly out of line with anything we've seen in previous elections. It was obvious to me as soon as the totals started coming in.
Is there not even the slightest possibility in your mind that people found him a big enough threat to the stability of the establishment that they all turned a blind eye to corruption of the voting procedures in this instance? It certainly appears that way in GA. I don't think Republicans were ever supposed to lose the house, but they did, and the same people who swore up and down the election was secure moved to change the voting laws to "fix" it.
(04-22-2022, 09:35 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ](04-22-2022, 09:23 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]Lol, do we? We need to presume that some people looked into it and didn't find anything. There is video after video of people dumping ballots. There's verifiable track record of corporate money being used to redirect oversight of voting procedures that resulted in staggering changes to the vote total in 6 key swing states. There's bragging coming from the media and the establishment in the form of "WE DID IT," as it pertains to the ousting of Trump. There's proof that the FBI aided and encouraged the protests of January 6th to go further than necessary, and a track record of them persecuting all Trump supporters. You really think this group is doing outstanding investigations into the integrity of the vote? The election numbers are staggeringly out of line with anything we've seen in previous elections. It was obvious to me as soon as the totals started coming in.
Is there not even the slightest possibility in your mind that people found him a big enough threat to the stability of the establishment that they all turned a blind eye to corruption of the voting procedures in this instance? It certainly appears that way in GA. I don't think Republicans were ever supposed to lose the house, but they did, and the same people who swore up and down the election was secure moved to change the voting laws to "fix" it.
A lot of people thought the vote totals were suspicious in November 2020.
Not one person found any evidence of a fake voter placing a fake vote. Don't you think that person would have gotten to Fox News, Newsmax, OAN, and gotten the word out?
They published so many theories about the machines themselves being hacked, and they got sued for it because there was no evidence to such libelous accusations. Those cases are pending. Legal fees are stacking up. Still no credible evidence of machine problems, almost all ballots were paper. The media was definitely willing to publish all sorts of theories, evidence or not.
Yet they did not publish evidence of even one person saying, "the voting rolls say I voted, but I didn't vote." No one found a single person with that testimony. Yet, according to you, there are a quarter of a million people out there with that story.
(04-22-2022, 09:35 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ](04-22-2022, 09:23 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]Lol, do we? We need to presume that some people looked into it and didn't find anything. There is video after video of people dumping ballots. There's verifiable track record of corporate money being used to redirect oversight of voting procedures that resulted in staggering changes to the vote total in 6 key swing states. There's bragging coming from the media and the establishment in the form of "WE DID IT," as it pertains to the ousting of Trump. There's proof that the FBI aided and encouraged the protests of January 6th to go further than necessary, and a track record of them persecuting all Trump supporters. You really think this group is doing outstanding investigations into the integrity of the vote? The election numbers are staggeringly out of line with anything we've seen in previous elections. It was obvious to me as soon as the totals started coming in.
Is there not even the slightest possibility in your mind that people found him a big enough threat to the stability of the establishment that they all turned a blind eye to corruption of the voting procedures in this instance? It certainly appears that way in GA. I don't think Republicans were ever supposed to lose the house, but they did, and the same people who swore up and down the election was secure moved to change the voting laws to "fix" it.
A lot of people thought the vote totals were suspicious in November 2020.
Not one person found any evidence of a fake voter placing a fake vote. Don't you think that person would have gotten to Fox News, Newsmax, OAN, and gotten the word out?
They published so many theories about the machines themselves being hacked, and they got sued for it because there was no evidence to such libelous accusations. Those cases are pending. Legal fees are stacking up. Still no credible evidence of machine problems, almost all ballots were paper. The media was definitely willing to publish all sorts of theories, evidence or not.
Yet they did not publish evidence of even one person saying, "the voting rolls say I voted, but I didn't vote." No one found a single person with that testimony. Yet, according to you, there are a quarter of a million people out there with that story.
(04-22-2022, 11:06 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ](04-22-2022, 09:35 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]A lot of people thought the vote totals were suspicious in November 2020.
Not one person found any evidence of a fake voter placing a fake vote. Don't you think that person would have gotten to Fox News, Newsmax, OAN, and gotten the word out?
They published so many theories about the machines themselves being hacked, and they got sued for it because there was no evidence to such libelous accusations. Those cases are pending. Legal fees are stacking up. Still no credible evidence of machine problems, almost all ballots were paper. The media was definitely willing to publish all sorts of theories, evidence or not.
Yet they did not publish evidence of even one person saying, "the voting rolls say I voted, but I didn't vote." No one found a single person with that testimony. Yet, according to you, there are a quarter of a million people out there with that story.
Who is looking up their vote? The kind of person who is disengaged is not typically checking to see if they voted. To your point, there was a major story about a college student who had someone vote for him. He checked out of curiosity and realize someone voted on his behalf. It made news stories for a couple days, then went away. Not that it matters, because your follow up will be that it's only one guy, am I right?
(04-23-2022, 12:23 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]There is a reason that in every election, a densely populated blue county keeps finding votes for a week after the election. When they need to get votes, they can find them by seeing who hasn't voted and getting those forms in. People who don't think they voted aren't checking that, bro. We also know they have ballot harvesters, who collect votes from people, with evidence that they are paid (seen in other videos), which is a form of vote manipulation. We have evidence of the elderly populations in retirement homes voting 100% for democrats, which is improbable. We have evidence of them doing the same thing in non-English speaking immigrant communities. This can account for a huge vote swing from people who otherwise wouldn't vote. Now, add to this the fact this happens only in blue counties, where they restrict access for review and don't tightly regulate the votes, and you have the perfect conditions to steal an election. It's not even close to being impossible.
(04-23-2022, 03:37 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]I misspoke. It was that there was 100% turnout in most of the retirement homes in swing counties. That's highly improbable. The WEC allowed changes that took away the special requirement to collect votes in retirement homes and you suddenly have a spike? That's a great coincidence, is it not? You're right in that we don't know who they voted for, but what do you think the odds are, man? I bet you think Republicans and democrats cheated an the same rate, huh. Or that these invalids who were voting just hated Trump so much, right? Lol.
"Gableman vetted the vote at 30 nursing homes in Milwaukee County, 12 in Racine County, and 24 in Dane County and found 100 percent turnout: All 2,155 registered voters in those 66 homes cast their ballots. At nine facilities in Kenosha County, the voter turnout was 97 percent. At 16 homes in Brown County, turnout was 95 percent."
There was also a sheriff that did an investigation in Racine County and came to the same result. The DA failed to prosecute because she said the people in charge of the nursing home didn't live in her district. Lol, what a joke. She didn't prosecute the other people that participated because they surely didn't understand the nuances of election law. Then the DNC releases a statement saying there was no fraud because no one was prosecuted. <------This is where you come in. You are so uninformed, man.
What evidence do you need? Who needs to present it? This is the playbook for the Dems stealing the election in Wisconsin, and there is plenty of evidence that suggests the colluded to tilt the odds in their favor.
https://www.maciverinstitute.com/2022/03...an-groups/
By way of comparison, statewide turnout was around 76 percent.