Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Next Level Combo
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3
(12-30-2022, 01:18 PM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-30-2022, 12:44 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]I have not studied rookie prospects yet at IOL. 

Funny you mention the TexTech kid. I brought him up in a draft thread yesterday as a 3-4 end candidate.
Tyree Wilson? 
Seems we are of a similar mind here. 

Smart draft picks to keep cap in check are indeed a must.

Yes..Tyree Wilson.

I did some research on him about 3 weeks earlier.  I liked what I saw.

Just "discovered" Clark Phillips III out of Utah.  He may be a very good prospect at CB who would be a good fit opposite Campbell.  Strikes me as a zone CB capable of playing man.  But he plays the ball as well and had great hands for the INT.

 https://youtu.be/BrrgRNG90EY

Phillips is one of my top corners in the draft.  I wouldnt play him opposite Campbell though as he played in the slot a ton this year and is great there.  Id keep Williams outside where he is best and was a big part of the Rams SB defense as an outside corner opposite of Ramsey.  Williams isnt very good when moved inside but a damn good outside corner.
Not sure why you think Trevor will fall off some. Add Ridley, better protection, and another year in scheme I think he only gets better.
(12-30-2022, 02:36 PM)NoShoes Wrote: [ -> ]Not sure why you think Trevor will fall off some. Add Ridley, better protection, and another year in scheme I think he only gets better.

Exactly. Trevor is already pretty elite when it comes to his tools and how he is steadily improving; and will be a genuine MVP candidate imo when he gets the things you mention.
(12-30-2022, 10:14 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]Big bodies. We need big men on both sides. Switch back to 43, put Walker with this hand in the dirt at RDE with Allen at Sam. You've already got the LBs for this with Foye, Lloyd and Muma. Clean up our questions at DE, G, OT and find a mid-rounder at DT to rotate with our current two. Yes we would love a Deion or Diggs at CB, but they guys we have are showing to be serviceable; it's time to focus on the trenches.

Diggs isn't anywhere close to Deion level of CB play. Diggs is vastly overrated. Sure he had one season with 11 INTs (only 3 in each of his other two seasons), but he gets beat A LOT. He gives up the most yards out of any CB in the league.
(12-30-2022, 08:25 PM)Eric1 Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-30-2022, 10:14 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]Big bodies. We need big men on both sides. Switch back to 43, put Walker with this hand in the dirt at RDE with Allen at Sam. You've already got the LBs for this with Foye, Lloyd and Muma. Clean up our questions at DE, G, OT and find a mid-rounder at DT to rotate with our current two. Yes we would love a Deion or Diggs at CB, but they guys we have are showing to be serviceable; it's time to focus on the trenches.

Diggs isn't anywhere close to Deion level of CB play. Diggs is vastly overrated. Sure he had one season with 11 INTs (only 3 in each of his other two seasons), but he gets beat A LOT. He gives up the most yards out of any CB in the league.
Preach.

He’s no Ram…. Nope nope. Not gonna do it.
Brunell gets far too much credit for what he was. Dude was surrounded by a HOF LT, a should be HOF WR and should be HOF RB and not to mention Keenan Mccardell. I know stats back then for QBs were a lot different than todays game but still, comparing him to others in that time frame he was mid at best.
Need to build a defense and shore up the O line. I read a post on Facebook (via Twitter) that Ramsey wants to play for Jacksonville again.
I don't want to derail the thread, but I would like to mention one thing that I have been thinking about lately.  In reference to the QB-HC duo, it's nice to have a great HC and a great QB, but it seems to me that the ultimate HC-QB duo involves a HC that is the de facto offensive coordinator.  When the HC is designing and calling the plays, along with a great QB, that is the most stable combination you can have, because you can maintain year to year continuity in your offensive system, even if you lose your offensive coordinator to a head coaching job somewhere else.  For example, if the Jags lost Press Taylor to a head coaching job somewhere else, our offense wouldn't change.  We would maintain the same system, the same plays, the same play-calling.      Kansas City has the same thing with Andy Reid and Patrick Mahomes.  It's the ideal combination of HC and QB.  But look what happened in New England when they lost Josh McDaniels.  New England is floundering around, still trying to figure out who should be running the offense.  But if KC lost Eric Bieniemy, would that happen?  No, because it's Andy Reid's offense, and he also calls the plays.  Same thing here in Jacksonville.  We won't have another team pull the brains out of our offense by hiring away our offensive coordinator to be their head coach.  Because our head coach, Doug Pederson, is actually the offensive coordinator.

So, bottom line, what I am trying to say is, the ideal combination of HC and QB is when the HC is actually, in fact if not in name, the offensive coordinator.
(12-31-2022, 08:56 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]I don't want to derail the thread, but I would like to mention one thing that I have been thinking about lately.  In reference to the QB-HC duo, it's nice to have a great HC and a great QB, but it seems to me that the ultimate HC-QB duo involves a HC that is the de facto offensive coordinator.  When the HC is designing and calling the plays, along with a great QB, that is the most stable combination you can have, because you can maintain year to year continuity in your offensive system, even if you lose your offensive coordinator to a head coaching job somewhere else.  For example, if the Jags lost Press Taylor to a head coaching job somewhere else, our offense wouldn't change.  We would maintain the same system, the same plays, the same play-calling.      Kansas City has the same thing with Andy Reid and Patrick Mahomes.  It's the ideal combination of HC and QB.  But look what happened in New England when they lost Josh McDaniels.  New England is floundering around, still trying to figure out who should be running the offense.  But if KC lost Eric Bieniemy, would that happen?  No, because it's Andy Reid's offense, and he also calls the plays.  Same thing here in Jacksonville.  We won't have another team pull the brains out of our offense by hiring away our offensive coordinator to be their head coach.  Because our head coach, Doug Pederson, is actually the offensive coordinator.


So, bottom line, what I am trying to say is, the ideal combination of HC and QB is when the HC is actually, in fact if not in name, the offensive coordinator.
Point taken.

Stated another way, you ideally want schematic continuity in the offense.

When Bill Walsh left the 49ers in 1988, they won the Super Bowl the next year and continued to be among the best in the league offensively for another decade because they ran the same offense.

Dallas didn't ascend to the playoffs in the 1990s until they dumped Shula's son as offensive coordinator after 1990 and hiring Norv Turner in 1991.  Turner instilled a Don Coryell type system and Dallas made the playoffs in 1991, won the Super Bowl in 1992 and 1993.  Jimmy Johnson and Norv Turner left in 1994.  Barry Switzer (who was a colege coach that ran the freaking wishbone offense for most of his college career became head coach in 1994.  He hired Ernie Zampeze, who was another long time Don Coryell offensive coordinator and kept the same offensive scheme, and the Cowboys went back to the Super Bowl in 1995 and the playoffs in 1996.  In the Dallas example, the HC had a defensive philosophy that remained constant from his college career to the NFL.  He had to find the right offensse later, but once h found the right offense, they had continuity and extended their success.

As for New England, Belichick and Brady won thei first three Super Bowls in 2001, 2003 and 2004.  Charlie Weis was their offensive coordinator during that time.  He left after that (becoming head coach at Kansas, IIRC).  In 2005, there was no OC., but in 2006 Josh McDaniels became OC and, they maintained the same schemes and overall philosophy.

Tampa is an illustration of the defensive continuity.  They rose to a serious super Bowl contender in 1998 using Tony Dungy's Cover 2 approach.  However, because the offense could not generate enough points to get over the hump, the Bucs eventually fired Dungly and replaced him with Gruden, who brought in a WCO approach, but kept the same defense that enabled the defense to dominate.

Bottom line is the teams are sticking with what philosophies  has proven to work with their personnel.  It's not necessarily dependent on whether it's the HC is calling the plays, etc.  It helps, but if the schematic continuity is the same, you could have a change in the HC and still maintain success
(12-31-2022, 08:56 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]I don't want to derail the thread, but I would like to mention one thing that I have been thinking about lately.  In reference to the QB-HC duo, it's nice to have a great HC and a great QB, but it seems to me that the ultimate HC-QB duo involves a HC that is the de facto offensive coordinator.  When the HC is designing and calling the plays, along with a great QB, that is the most stable combination you can have, because you can maintain year to year continuity in your offensive system, even if you lose your offensive coordinator to a head coaching job somewhere else.  For example, if the Jags lost Press Taylor to a head coaching job somewhere else, our offense wouldn't change.  We would maintain the same system, the same plays, the same play-calling.      Kansas City has the same thing with Andy Reid and Patrick Mahomes.  It's the ideal combination of HC and QB.  But look what happened in New England when they lost Josh McDaniels.  New England is floundering around, still trying to figure out who should be running the offense.  But if KC lost Eric Bieniemy, would that happen?  No, because it's Andy Reid's offense, and he also calls the plays.  Same thing here in Jacksonville.  We won't have another team pull the brains out of our offense by hiring away our offensive coordinator to be their head coach.  Because our head coach, Doug Pederson, is actually the offensive coordinator.

So, bottom line, what I am trying to say is, the ideal combination of HC and QB is when the HC is actually, in fact if not in name, the offensive coordinator.

I think it is an advantage to have this dynamic in place.

I will point out that this playbook (while reflective of Pederson's prior efforts) is unique in some ways. And I think that comes down to an interesting collaboration. 

Pederson pointed out in two separate pressers (Summer and Fall) that the group that collectively built this playbook comprise the most talented offensive hive he's ever been a part of. 

Mike McCoy, and JB Cooter have 45 years experience between them and have both directed very prolific passing attacks in the league. 
Press Taylor is the young up and comer of the bunch and clearly has garnered respect. He must have helped Pederson bring Wentz along in some way during their time in Philly  - something that caught Doug's eye. 
It will be interesting to see how many stick around.
(12-31-2022, 09:33 AM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-31-2022, 08:56 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]I don't want to derail the thread, but I would like to mention one thing that I have been thinking about lately.  In reference to the QB-HC duo, it's nice to have a great HC and a great QB, but it seems to me that the ultimate HC-QB duo involves a HC that is the de facto offensive coordinator.

...
...


So, bottom line, what I am trying to say is, the ideal combination of HC and QB is when the HC is actually, in fact if not in name, the offensive coordinator.
Point taken.

Stated another way, you ideally want schematic continuity in the offense.

When Bill Walsh left the 49ers in 1988, they won the Super Bowl the next year and continued to be among the best in the league offensively for another decade because they ran the same offense.

...

...

Bottom line is the teams are sticking with what philosophies  has proven to work with their personnel.  It's not necessarily dependent on whether it's the HC is calling the plays, etc.  It helps, but if the schematic continuity is the same, you could have a change in the HC and still maintain success

To the bolded:
I think this is important.

Pederson won't be able to maintain his staff long term if  they have prolonged success, but if the "architect" remains at the helm, then the right  rotating cast underneath should have some continuity.
(12-31-2022, 08:56 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]I don't want to derail the thread, but I would like to mention one thing that I have been thinking about lately.  In reference to the QB-HC duo, it's nice to have a great HC and a great QB, but it seems to me that the ultimate HC-QB duo involves a HC that is the de facto offensive coordinator.  When the HC is designing and calling the plays, along with a great QB, that is the most stable combination you can have, because you can maintain year to year continuity in your offensive system, even if you lose your offensive coordinator to a head coaching job somewhere else.  For example, if the Jags lost Press Taylor to a head coaching job somewhere else, our offense wouldn't change.  We would maintain the same system, the same plays, the same play-calling.      Kansas City has the same thing with Andy Reid and Patrick Mahomes.  It's the ideal combination of HC and QB.  But look what happened in New England when they lost Josh McDaniels.  New England is floundering around, still trying to figure out who should be running the offense.  But if KC lost Eric Bieniemy, would that happen?  No, because it's Andy Reid's offense, and he also calls the plays.  Same thing here in Jacksonville.  We won't have another team pull the brains out of our offense by hiring away our offensive coordinator to be their head coach.  Because our head coach, Doug Pederson, is actually the offensive coordinator.

So, bottom line, what I am trying to say is, the ideal combination of HC and QB is when the HC is actually, in fact if not in name, the offensive coordinator.
Let me assure you I don't believe you have derailed/hijacked the thread.  I think there is a definite link between building a championship team and sustaining that success once built.  But that subtle shift raises issues in my mind that, while related to the topics at hand, could, at least serve as something of a buzz kill.  Given how the fan base is feeling optimistic about the team for the first time in ages, I don't raise these issues/concerns lightly.

With that said, I would caution those who want to continue to feel good about the future prospects for this team and continue to bask in the current glow to avoid this post.  This post will be on the longer side, so if you are averse to my "novels" to avoid it.

These caveats aside, I would submit another key to sustaining the success initiated by the HC/QB combo is sustaining the level of talent needed to achieve the success.  Back in 2020  I posted this thread on the board detailing the roster purge of our last playoff team and the effects of that purge.  Here is that post.  https://www.duvalpride.com/showthread.ph...+of+Terror

Like the 2017 team's ascent to contention and descent to liquidation, free agency played a large role- perhaps an outsized role, in the possible ascent of this team.  This year, we've added the following veterans:

WR Christian Kirk
WR Zay Jones
WR Calvin Ridley (trade)
TE Evan Engram
G Brandon Scherff
DT Foley Fatukasi
LB Oluakon
SS Rayshawn Jenkins
CB Darious Williams

That's at least 9 starters/major contributors whose contracts will have expired by Trevor Lawrence's 5th year, or will be in their 30s by then.  This doesn't factor in other possible free agent departures, retirements, and other needed replacements/upgrades.  If we win a Super Bowl with this nucleus, while some free agents may be more willing to sign with us at a lower price, it'll be harder to do as heavily with Trevor Lawrence's new deal. We'll need cheaper players.

That will mean rookies with rookie contracts.

If we draft as poorly as we did between 2019 and 2020...if 2023, 2024 and 2025 don't adequately upgrade and replenish the talent we'll be in also ran status even with Trevor Lawrence firmly established as a lifelong Jaguar on a Hall of Fame trajectory.  We'd end up with our window of success prematurely shut.  It would represent a betrayal of Trevor Lawrence, Doug Pederson, the fans, and everyone on the team committed to winning.  Starting this next draft, the draft will have increasing importance even though we found the QB.  We have to hit on those picks.  We ca'nt deplete the talent on the roster as we did between 2019 and 2020.
All highly valid points. Another factor to consider is usage of talent available. Not just by the HC, but by the QB as well.

For a very long time the Patriots were able to continually bring in less than glamorous FA players and make them fit a scheme. I not only credit Belichick’s coaching and scouting abilities, but the core talent of that team, mainly the GOAT, for its ability to draw the required talent from their FA acquisitions. They played hard for a team they believed in. We need that atmosphere in Jacksonville to establish a consistent winning result as the talent pool churns. I think Doug and Trevor are just the guys to do it.
(12-31-2022, 02:58 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]All highly valid points. Another factor to consider is usage of talent available. Not just by the HC, but by the QB as well.

For a very long time the Patriots were able to continually bring in less than glamorous FA players and make them fit a scheme. I not only credit Belichick’s coaching and scouting abilities, but the core talent of that team, mainly the GOAT, for its ability to draw the required talent from their FA acquisitions. They played hard for a team they believed in. We need that atmosphere in Jacksonville to establish a consistent winning result as the talent pool churns. I think Doug and Trevor are just the guys to do it.

Yes.  I think the coach and FO have to be completely in synch when it comes to talent acquisition.
(12-31-2022, 02:41 PM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-31-2022, 08:56 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]I don't want to derail the thread, but I would like to mention one thing that I have been thinking about lately.  In reference to the QB-HC duo, it's nice to have a great HC and a great QB, but it seems to me that the ultimate HC-QB duo involves a HC that is the de facto offensive coordinator.  When the HC is designing and calling the plays, along with a great QB, that is the most stable combination you can have, because you can maintain year to year continuity in your offensive system, even if you lose your offensive coordinator to a head coaching job somewhere else.  For example, if the Jags lost Press Taylor to a head coaching job somewhere else, our offense wouldn't change.  We would maintain the same system, the same plays, the same play-calling.      Kansas City has the same thing with Andy Reid and Patrick Mahomes.  It's the ideal combination of HC and QB.  But look what happened in New England when they lost Josh McDaniels.  New England is floundering around, still trying to figure out who should be running the offense.  But if KC lost Eric Bieniemy, would that happen?  No, because it's Andy Reid's offense, and he also calls the plays.  Same thing here in Jacksonville.  We won't have another team pull the brains out of our offense by hiring away our offensive coordinator to be their head coach.  Because our head coach, Doug Pederson, is actually the offensive coordinator.

So, bottom line, what I am trying to say is, the ideal combination of HC and QB is when the HC is actually, in fact if not in name, the offensive coordinator.
Let me assure you I don't believe you have derailed/hijacked the thread.  I think there is a definite link between building a championship team and sustaining that success once built.  But that subtle shift raises issues in my mind that, while related to the topics at hand, could, at least serve as something of a buzz kill.  Given how the fan base is feeling optimistic about the team for the first time in ages, I don't raise these issues/concerns lightly.

With that said, I would caution those who want to continue to feel good about the future prospects for this team and continue to bask in the current glow to avoid this post.  This post will be on the longer side, so if you are averse to my "novels" to avoid it.

These caveats aside, I would submit another key to sustaining the success initiated by the HC/QB combo is sustaining the level of talent needed to achieve the success.  Back in 2020  I posted this thread on the board detailing the roster purge of our last playoff team and the effects of that purge.  Here is that post.  https://www.duvalpride.com/showthread.ph...+of+Terror

Like the 2017 team's ascent to contention and descent to liquidation, free agency played a large role- perhaps an outsized role, in the possible ascent of this team.  This year, we've added the following veterans:

WR Christian Kirk
WR Zay Jones
WR Calvin Ridley (trade)
TE Evan Engram
G Brandon Scherff
DT Foley Fatukasi
LB Oluakon
SS Rayshawn Jenkins
CB Darious Williams

That's at least 9 starters/major contributors whose contracts will have expired by Trevor Lawrence's 5th year, or will be in their 30s by then.  This doesn't factor in other possible free agent departures, retirements, and other needed replacements/upgrades.  If we win a Super Bowl with this nucleus, while some free agents may be more willing to sign with us at a lower price, it'll be harder to do as heavily with Trevor Lawrence's new deal. We'll need cheaper players.

That will mean rookies with rookie contracts.

If we draft as poorly as we did between 2019 and 2020...if 2023, 2024 and 2025 don't adequately upgrade and replenish the talent we'll be in also ran status even with Trevor Lawrence firmly established as a lifelong Jaguar on a Hall of Fame trajectory.  We'd end up with our window of success prematurely shut.  It would represent a betrayal of Trevor Lawrence, Doug Pederson, the fans, and everyone on the team committed to winning.  Starting this next draft, the draft will have increasing importance even though we found the QB.  We have to hit on those picks.  We ca'nt deplete the talent on the roster as we did between 2019 and 2020.
You are correct that the Jaguars must draft well going forward in order to maintain their success. Pederson and Lawrence would be the first to say that it takes more than a great quarterback and coach to maintain success in the NFL. The Jaguars overall performance in the draft since their playoff win against the Steelers in 2008 until Baalke became GM in 2020 was historically awful. Of the 14 number 1 draft picks during this period, it is not farfetched to say that 10 were busts! The abysmal ten are bookended by Derrick Harvey in 2008 and the dynamic duo of Henderson and Chaisson in 2020. Sandwiched in between were Gabbert, Blackmon, Joeckel, Bortles, Fowler, Fournette and Bryan. One may quibble over Bortles and Fowler being on this list, but both were very bad picks. Fournette is included despite being mediocre considering they could have taken Mahomes or McCaffrey. Josh Allen, Alualu, and Eugene Monroe were the best picks and one could say that all 3 were disappointments despite having their moments. I'm not including Ramsay (most hated Jaguar ever) because he turned out to be such a negative influence on the team.

It is way too early to judge Baalke's draft choices in his two seasons as GM. He deserves zero credit for Lawrence since there has never been an easier pick. I believe that Walker, Lloyd, Cisco, Etienne and Campbell have the potential to be very good, although Campbell is the only one who has played at a consistently high level. If Walker Little is able to be a consistent starting tackle and Fortner continues to develop Baalke's two year grade will be a solid B, at the worst. He certainly has his issues, but so far he has been far superior to Shack Harris, Gene Smith and Dave Caldwell. He owes them a debt of gratitude for setting the bar so low!

Let's enjoy the likely success this team should have over the next 3 seasons and hope that Baalke continues what appears to be a successful two years of drafts!
(12-31-2022, 04:49 PM)jaglou53 Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-31-2022, 02:41 PM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]Let me assure you I don't believe you have derailed/hijacked the thread.  I think there is a definite link between building a championship team and sustaining that success once built.  But that subtle shift raises issues in my mind that, while related to the topics at hand, could, at least serve as something of a buzz kill.  Given how the fan base is feeling optimistic about the team for the first time in ages, I don't raise these issues/concerns lightly.

With that said, I would caution those who want to continue to feel good about the future prospects for this team and continue to bask in the current glow to avoid this post.  This post will be on the longer side, so if you are averse to my "novels" to avoid it.

These caveats aside, I would submit another key to sustaining the success initiated by the HC/QB combo is sustaining the level of talent needed to achieve the success.  Back in 2020  I posted this thread on the board detailing the roster purge of our last playoff team and the effects of that purge.  Here is that post.  https://www.duvalpride.com/showthread.ph...+of+Terror

Like the 2017 team's ascent to contention and descent to liquidation, free agency played a large role- perhaps an outsized role, in the possible ascent of this team.  This year, we've added the following veterans:

WR Christian Kirk
WR Zay Jones
WR Calvin Ridley (trade)
TE Evan Engram
G Brandon Scherff
DT Foley Fatukasi
LB Oluakon
SS Rayshawn Jenkins
CB Darious Williams

That's at least 9 starters/major contributors whose contracts will have expired by Trevor Lawrence's 5th year, or will be in their 30s by then.  This doesn't factor in other possible free agent departures, retirements, and other needed replacements/upgrades.  If we win a Super Bowl with this nucleus, while some free agents may be more willing to sign with us at a lower price, it'll be harder to do as heavily with Trevor Lawrence's new deal. We'll need cheaper players.

That will mean rookies with rookie contracts.

If we draft as poorly as we did between 2019 and 2020...if 2023, 2024 and 2025 don't adequately upgrade and replenish the talent we'll be in also ran status even with Trevor Lawrence firmly established as a lifelong Jaguar on a Hall of Fame trajectory.  We'd end up with our window of success prematurely shut.  It would represent a betrayal of Trevor Lawrence, Doug Pederson, the fans, and everyone on the team committed to winning.  Starting this next draft, the draft will have increasing importance even though we found the QB.  We have to hit on those picks.  We ca'nt deplete the talent on the roster as we did between 2019 and 2020.
You are correct that the Jaguars must draft well going forward in order to maintain their success. Pederson and Lawrence would be the first to say that it takes more than a great quarterback and coach to maintain success in the NFL. The Jaguars overall performance in the draft since their playoff win against the Steelers in 2008 until Baalke became GM in 2020 was historically awful. Of the 14 number 1 draft picks during this period, it is not farfetched to say that 10 were busts! The abysmal ten are bookended by Derrick Harvey in 2008 and the dynamic duo of Henderson and Chaisson in 2020. Sandwiched in between were Gabbert, Blackmon, Joeckel, Bortles, Fowler, Fournette and Bryan. One may quibble over Bortles and Fowler being on this list, but both were very bad picks. Fournette is included despite being mediocre considering they could have taken Mahomes or McCaffrey. Josh Allen, Alualu, and Eugene Monroe were the best picks and one could say that all 3 were disappointments despite having their moments. I'm not including Ramsay (most hated Jaguar ever) because he turned out to be such a negative influence on the team.

It is way too early to judge Baalke's draft choices in his two seasons as GM. He deserves zero credit for Lawrence since there has never been an easier pick. I believe that Walker, Lloyd, Cisco, Etienne and Campbell have the potential to be very good, although Campbell is the only one who has played at a consistently high level. If Walker Little is able to be a consistent starting tackle and Fortner continues to develop Baalke's two year grade will be a solid B, at the worst. He certainly has his issues, but so far he has been far superior to Shack Harris, Gene Smith and Dave Caldwell. He owes them a debt of gratitude for setting the bar so low!

Let's enjoy the likely success this team should have over the next 3 seasons and hope that Baalke continues what appears to be a successful two years of drafts!
While I will nt get into the comparison between Jaguars' GMs, I agree with the analysis that it's too early to gauge how well Baalke has done, though you could argue that simply by virtue of drafting Trevor Lawrence, he's already a success.  But, since this team is a year removed from a league wrst 3-14 record, and two removed from 1-15. the presumption this is not a complete team from a talent standpoint seems safe.

That said, based on where we are right now, and assuming we win the last two games of the regular season and ultimately the division, how many new starters do  we need going into the next season to be a Super Bowl team?  Based on what has been discussed in this thread, OL (2-RT to perhaps replace Jawaan Taylor-depending on how the team feels about Walker Little- and an upgrade at LG), Edge rusher and CB 1-2) are safe assumptions.  So maybe 3-5 quality starters to upgrade the positions listed?  f we aree unable to retain Engram, that's another.  How likely is that, especially given our lower draft position?  Baalke and company are going to have to hit big on some mid round draft picks to reach that 3-5 quality starters level.  That doesn't even get into depth.

How likely is it to expect that much positive impact in one draft?
(12-31-2022, 02:58 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]All highly valid points. Another factor to consider is usage of talent available. Not just by the HC, but by the QB as well.

For a very long time the Patriots were able to continually bring in less than glamorous FA players and make them fit a scheme. I not only credit Belichick’s coaching and scouting abilities, but the core talent of that team, mainly the GOAT, for its ability to draw the required talent from their FA acquisitions. They played hard for a team they believed in. We need that atmosphere in Jacksonville to establish a consistent winning result as the talent pool churns. I think Doug and Trevor are just the guys to do it.

One thing I feel....the coming years are going to be fun!  Banana
(01-01-2023, 11:43 AM)Mowerguy Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-31-2022, 02:58 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]All highly valid points. Another factor to consider is usage of talent available. Not just by the HC, but by the QB as well.

For a very long time the Patriots were able to continually bring in less than glamorous FA players and make them fit a scheme. I not only credit Belichick’s coaching and scouting abilities, but the core talent of that team, mainly the GOAT, for its ability to draw the required talent from their FA acquisitions. They played hard for a team they believed in. We need that atmosphere in Jacksonville to establish a consistent winning result as the talent pool churns. I think Doug and Trevor are just the guys to do it.

One thing I feel....the coming years are going to be fun!  Banana

[Image: giphy.gif]
(01-01-2023, 10:15 AM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-31-2022, 04:49 PM)jaglou53 Wrote: [ -> ]You are correct that the Jaguars must draft well going forward in order to maintain their success. Pederson and Lawrence would be the first to say that it takes more than a great quarterback and coach to maintain success in the NFL. The Jaguars overall performance in the draft since their playoff win against the Steelers in 2008 until Baalke became GM in 2020 was historically awful. Of the 14 number 1 draft picks during this period, it is not farfetched to say that 10 were busts! The abysmal ten are bookended by Derrick Harvey in 2008 and the dynamic duo of Henderson and Chaisson in 2020. Sandwiched in between were Gabbert, Blackmon, Joeckel, Bortles, Fowler, Fournette and Bryan. One may quibble over Bortles and Fowler being on this list, but both were very bad picks. Fournette is included despite being mediocre considering they could have taken Mahomes or McCaffrey. Josh Allen, Alualu, and Eugene Monroe were the best picks and one could say that all 3 were disappointments despite having their moments. I'm not including Ramsay (most hated Jaguar ever) because he turned out to be such a negative influence on the team.

It is way too early to judge Baalke's draft choices in his two seasons as GM. He deserves zero credit for Lawrence since there has never been an easier pick. I believe that Walker, Lloyd, Cisco, Etienne and Campbell have the potential to be very good, although Campbell is the only one who has played at a consistently high level. If Walker Little is able to be a consistent starting tackle and Fortner continues to develop Baalke's two year grade will be a solid B, at the worst. He certainly has his issues, but so far he has been far superior to Shack Harris, Gene Smith and Dave Caldwell. He owes them a debt of gratitude for setting the bar so low!

Let's enjoy the likely success this team should have over the next 3 seasons and hope that Baalke continues what appears to be a successful two years of drafts!
While I will nt get into the comparison between Jaguars' GMs, I agree with the analysis that it's too early to gauge how well Baalke has done, though you could argue that simply by virtue of drafting Trevor Lawrence, he's already a success.  But, since this team is a year removed from a league wrst 3-14 record, and two removed from 1-15. the presumption this is not a complete team from a talent standpoint seems safe.

That said, based on where we are right now, and assuming we win the last two games of the regular season and ultimately the division, how many new starters do  we need going into the next season to be a Super Bowl team?  Based on what has been discussed in this thread, OL (2-RT to perhaps replace Jawaan Taylor-depending on how the team feels about Walker Little- and an upgrade at LG), Edge rusher and CB 1-2) are safe assumptions.  So maybe 3-5 quality starters to upgrade the positions listed?  f we aree unable to retain Engram, that's another.  How likely is that, especially given our lower draft position?  Baalke and company are going to have to hit big on some mid round draft picks to reach that 3-5 quality starters level.  That doesn't even get into depth.

How likely is it to expect that much positive impact in one draft?

Before answering your question regarding new starters, I will make the following assumptions:

1. Darious Williams is kept at the 2nd corner position where he has played well as of late. He was very solid with the Rams ranking 4th in 2020 for cornerbacks according to PFF.

2. Evan Engram is re-signed during the off-season being rewarded with a multi-year deal. 

3. Walker Little is promoted to starting right tackle and will prove to be worth the 2nd round pick the Jaguars used to get him.

4. Devin Lloyd plays consistently at the level he demonstrated early this season at linebacker.


Based on these 4 positions being secure, these are the new starting positions needed for 2023:

1. Right tackle: Walker Little moves into this spot. No need to draft a starter at this position.

2. Edge rusher: Caldwell moves Trevon Walker to his more natural position on the defensive line. Chaisson is cut in the off-season. An Edge should be drafted in rounds 1 or 2 to fill this spot assuming the team remains utilizing a 3-4 as it's primary defense. The team is fortunate that there will be at least a couple of excellent options when they pick somewhere in the 20's including Jared Verse and B.J. Ojulari.

3. Left guard: Ben Bartch has yet to show he can be a reliable starter so an upgrade is necessary. A solid replacement can be found in rounds 2 or 3 of the 2023 draft. Andrew Vorhees from USC would be a great pick since he has also played some tackle and is very experienced. If he is gone, Cooper Beebe or Jarrett Patterson would be potential selections in rounds 2 or 3.

4. Nickel-back: There is a deep group of corners/nickels in this draft and an immediate starter can be found in rounds 2 or 3. Ideally, rounds 2 and 3 would be used to take guard and nickel with the best value player given priority in round 2.


These are the 4 positions requiring new starters and it is very possible it can be achieved through the 2023 draft, as indicated above. The defensive line needs to be strengthened to some degree since Smoot, Key and possibly Robertson-Harris will be gone. Ideally, they get Robertson-Harris to sign a "reasonable" deal since he has performed well as a Jaguar. If they can't afford to do this, they will likely need to add at least one rotational player on the line to support Fatukasi, Walker and Hamilton. 

If all of this can be achieved for 2023, could the Jaguars contend for the Super Bowl? That will depend on Lawrence's continued growth and the uncertainty of injuries. However, who would have predicted this team would have a better than average chance of making the 2022-23 playoffs following a combined 4 wins in 2020 and 2021? When you have an elite quarterback and the perfect guy to coach him, winning division titles and contending for Super Bowls is not an unrealistic expectation to have.
(01-01-2023, 12:16 PM)jaglou53 Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-01-2023, 10:15 AM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]While I will nt get into the comparison between Jaguars' GMs, I agree with the analysis that it's too early to gauge how well Baalke has done, though you could argue that simply by virtue of drafting Trevor Lawrence, he's already a success.  But, since this team is a year removed from a league wrst 3-14 record, and two removed from 1-15. the presumption this is not a complete team from a talent standpoint seems safe.

That said, based on where we are right now, and assuming we win the last two games of the regular season and ultimately the division, how many new starters do  we need going into the next season to be a Super Bowl team?  Based on what has been discussed in this thread, OL (2-RT to perhaps replace Jawaan Taylor-depending on how the team feels about Walker Little- and an upgrade at LG), Edge rusher and CB 1-2) are safe assumptions.  So maybe 3-5 quality starters to upgrade the positions listed?  f we aree unable to retain Engram, that's another.  How likely is that, especially given our lower draft position?  Baalke and company are going to have to hit big on some mid round draft picks to reach that 3-5 quality starters level.  That doesn't even get into depth.

How likely is it to expect that much positive impact in one draft?

Before answering your question regarding new starters, I will make the following assumptions:

1. Darious Williams is kept at the 2nd corner position where he has played well as of late. He was very solid with the Rams ranking 4th in 2020 for cornerbacks according to PFF.

2. Evan Engram is re-signed during the off-season being rewarded with a multi-year deal. 

3. Walker Little is promoted to starting right tackle and will prove to be worth the 2nd round pick the Jaguars used to get him.

4. Devin Lloyd plays consistently at the level he demonstrated early this season at linebacker.


Based on these 4 positions being secure, these are the new starting positions needed for 2023:

1. Right tackle: Walker Little moves into this spot. No need to draft a starter at this position.

2. Edge rusher: Caldwell moves Trevon Walker to his more natural position on the defensive line. Chaisson is cut in the off-season. An Edge should be drafted in rounds 1 or 2 to fill this spot assuming the team remains utilizing a 3-4 as it's primary defense. The team is fortunate that there will be at least a couple of excellent options when they pick somewhere in the 20's including Jared Verse and B.J. Ojulari.

3. Left guard: Ben Bartch has yet to show he can be a reliable starter so an upgrade is necessary. A solid replacement can be found in rounds 2 or 3 of the 2023 draft. Andrew Vorhees from USC would be a great pick since he has also played some tackle and is very experienced. If he is gone, Cooper Beebe or Jarrett Patterson would be potential selections in rounds 2 or 3.

4. Nickel-back: There is a deep group of corners/nickels in this draft and an immediate starter can be found in rounds 2 or 3. Ideally, rounds 2 and 3 would be used to take guard and nickel with the best value player given priority in round 2.


These are the 4 positions requiring new starters and it is very possible it can be achieved through the 2023 draft, as indicated above. The defensive line needs to be strengthened to some degree since Smoot, Key and possibly Robertson-Harris will be gone. Ideally, they get Robertson-Harris to sign a "reasonable" deal since he has performed well as a Jaguar. If they can't afford to do this, they will likely need to add at least one rotational player on the line to support Fatukasi, Walker and Hamilton. 

If all of this can be achieved for 2023, could the Jaguars contend for the Super Bowl? That will depend on Lawrence's continued growth and the uncertainty of injuries. However, who would have predicted this team would have a better than average chance of making the 2022-23 playoffs following a combined 4 wins in 2020 and 2021? When you have an elite quarterback and the perfect guy to coach him, winning division titles and contending for Super Bowls is not an unrealistic expectation to have.

I might be a bit too much of a homer, and maybe I'm just really high on the fact that we look so good...

But I think our Secondary looks OK for another year...  Tyson Campbell, Montaric Brown, Darius Williams, Chris Claybrooks, hell with Trey Herndon in there as back up along with Trevaugn Cambell?  I think of the 3 corps of the defense, the secondary seems to be the one with depth and talent that we can ride into 2023.  

Now, let's consider the total collapse in October.  That month, our entire team was exposed.  Many focused on Lawrence.  But many of us also started calling for our DC's ouster.  I, was one of them.  The secondary look lost.  The LB'ers look lost.  And our D-Line was playing on roller blades.  All that to say that it wasn't just the secondary that was the problem in October.  However, there were issues in the secondary that looked really bad.  Tyson Cambell was the only shining light.  But since October, the entire secondary has looked very good.  It's possible that this unit isn't as talent voided as we thought.  And it's possible Caldwell's system is beginning to take hold on the players.

I agree that Key and Smoot are going to be an issue as Unrestricted Free Agents (UFAs).  Smoot of course, tore his achilles.  He won't be even ready to play untill November at the earliest.  And Key, who I really like is a UFA that will probably try to test the market.  I hope we can sign him, but we don't have the cap space to pay him unless he takes a team friendly deal.  But Robertson Harris is under contract, we may cut him, actually instead of resigning him depending on what we decide to do. 

And that's the thing.  If you look at the depth chart, we run a hybrid 3-4.  And we have lots of issues that need to be addressed regarding DE "edge" rushers versus DT type edge setters... The jaguars.com depth chart shows key in multiple positions.  He's very valuable in terms of depth and talent.  Safe to say we have a lot of hybrid type talent that can be moved around in a 3-4.

I think the point is that if you want to shore up the D, I don't think it's the Secondary you focus on in this off-season.  

Personally, I think the primary focus should be the O-Line.  Cam Robinson is out at LT, Taylor is UFA as RT...  The entire success of this team is because of Trevor Lawrence.  Walker Little looks good and will fix one of the tackles.  But we need to fix the other tackle...  Cam wasn't all that great to begin with...  Dude is more inconsistent that my 12 year old daughter determining what she's going to wear out to go grab some ice cream at Baskin Robbins.  And Taylor is probably going to be bought out by another team that has unlimted cap space.  

So assume Little is one Tackle, Cam may or may not be back by November, and Taylor is gone.  So we now have major issues on the O-Line.  The one group that protects our QB.  You gotta focus on the O-Line this draft.  You gotta get at least 1 starter and then a couple depth...  Draft O-Line...  Protect the next 20 years.
Pages: 1 2 3