(07-13-2024, 08:13 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]From looking at the videos Trump turned his head to the right. That just may have saved his life.
(07-13-2024, 08:55 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]We have a few video review guys on this board, Take a look at the video. My opinion is just before we hear the pop Trump turns his head to his right to look at the crowd. If he doesn't do this he is dead.
(07-13-2024, 08:57 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (07-13-2024, 08:55 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]We have a few video review guys on this board, Take a look at the video. My opinion is just before we hear the pop Trump turns his head to his right to look at the crowd. If he doesn't do this he is dead.
Divine intervention is the only explanation at this point.
The way I'm seeing the layout is the shooter was on that side. From the camera angles, the fans seated to the right, Trump's left, were the ones shot. He waited until Trump looked that way to fire, probably because of his TDS and wanting to see Trump. It probably did save Trump because if he was looking forward, it doesn't end that way.
Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
(07-13-2024, 07:23 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Joe said this just last week.
“It’s time to put Trump in a bullseye.”
It was an official act, so Biden's covered.
(07-13-2024, 09:35 PM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ] (07-13-2024, 07:23 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Joe said this just last week.
“It’s time to put Trump in a bullseye.”
It was an official act, so Biden's covered.
It's just this kind of divisive idiocy which fuels this.
You're not stupid. Stop acting like it.
(07-13-2024, 09:41 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ] (07-13-2024, 09:35 PM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ]It was an official act, so Biden's covered.
It's just this kind of divisive idiocy which fuels this.
You're not stupid. Stop acting like it.
You give them too much credit.
BBC has the best information. Seems our guys are not mentioning it.
(07-13-2024, 09:41 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ] (07-13-2024, 09:35 PM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ]It was an official act, so Biden's covered.
It's just this kind of divisive idiocy which fuels this.
You're not stupid. Stop acting like it.
Be cool. Just projecting what the LWNJ's are saying.
This locked it up for Trump..
I can already see where the MSM is going to take the narrative up to the election:
'Extra security and precautions are being taken with President Biden in anticipation of MAGA retaliation...'
MAGA retaliation
MAGA retaliation
MAGA retaliation
(07-13-2024, 09:56 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]This locked it up for Trump..
100%. Dems were wishing / praying for Biden to no longer be the lead story.
Be careful what you wish for.
(07-13-2024, 08:22 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: [ -> ] (07-13-2024, 08:20 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]"it's time to stop talking about these debates, and put Trump in a crosshair".
Bullseye, not crosshair. But same difference.
If this had been voiced by Repubs, it would have been labeled terror speech.
(07-13-2024, 09:59 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]I can already see where the MSM is going to take the narrative up to the election:
'Extra security and precautions are being taken with President Biden in anticipation of MAGA retaliation...'
MAGA retaliation
MAGA retaliation
MAGA retaliation
I think it's a cover for what they intend to do to pudding brain and where blame will be shifted.
(07-13-2024, 09:35 PM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ] (07-13-2024, 07:23 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Joe said this just last week.
“It’s time to put Trump in a bullseye.”
It was an official act, so Biden's covered.
That wasn't an order.
But yes, if it was an order, Biden could not be prosecuted for that.
It would be an unlawful order, an order that must not be followed, but Biden would be immune from prosecution.
Impeachment would be the remedy.
That is, until Senators start caterwauling and saying that it's not their issue and it really should be a criminal matter.
All a game.
I’m switching back and forth between different channels right now. CBS has called out the SS for not protecting the former president better than this! Who would have thunk it?
Wait, never mind. They are back to their usual selves. They just said he was wrong for not telling his followers to not retaliate in his statement.
(07-13-2024, 10:06 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: [ -> ]I’m switching back and forth between different channels right now. CBS has called out the SS for not protecting the former president better than this! Who would have thunk it?
Could have been one of the SS going rogue.
(07-13-2024, 10:09 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (07-13-2024, 10:06 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: [ -> ]I’m switching back and forth between different channels right now. CBS has called out the SS for not protecting the former president better than this! Who would have thunk it?
Could have been one of theirs going rogue.
A couple of them have said it.
![[Image: StR2B.jpg]](https://s10.gifyu.com/images/StR2B.jpg)