(11-14-2024, 10:23 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]https://x.com/stillgray/status/185724345...ScpSA&s=19
He's talking about a recess appointment being appropriate if Democrats try to abuse the filibuster power. He did not discuss what he would do if four Republicans defect and there is no Senate majority for confirmation.
(11-14-2024, 10:58 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (11-14-2024, 10:23 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]https://x.com/stillgray/status/185724345...ScpSA&s=19
He's talking about a recess appointment being appropriate if Democrats try to abuse the filibuster power. He did not discuss what he would do if four Republicans defect and there is no Senate majority for confirmation.
You know he met with all 3 candidates and already got their word, correct?
Per Rick Scott
(11-14-2024, 11:02 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ] (11-14-2024, 10:58 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]He's talking about a recess appointment being appropriate if Democrats try to abuse the filibuster power. He did not discuss what he would do if four Republicans defect and there is no Senate majority for confirmation.
You know he met with all 3 candidates and already got their word, correct?
Per Rick Scott
You know there has to be a vote about whether there's a recess or not, right? It's not just something the majority leader can dictate to the other 99.
(11-14-2024, 11:52 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ] (11-14-2024, 11:49 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]You know there has to be a vote about whether there's a recess or not, right? It's not just something the majority leader can dictate to the other 99.
Simple majority
Right and if you have 4 Republican senators who disagree about one of the appointments there will not be a simple majority to recess.
(11-14-2024, 03:05 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ] (11-14-2024, 03:01 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]The Matt Gaetz investigations failed to find anything. It was an info war run by the current establishment which quietly they abandoned.
If they would have found anything, and I mean N-E-Thing on Gaetz in the last handful of years, dude would have been in prison already..
You know how the leftists operate.. Blame others, for what you are guilty of..
Also phrased "every accusation is a confession"
(11-15-2024, 12:00 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (11-14-2024, 11:52 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]Simple majority
Right and if you have 4 Republican senators who disagree about one of the appointments there will not be a simple majority to recess.
It is called crossing that bridge when you cross it. What is amazing, after the last 4 years the behavior of the Democratic party has done something I never would have thought possible. The Republicans are of one mind. I have never seen that.
(11-13-2024, 09:30 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ] (11-13-2024, 08:20 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]Remember when that guy said he had proof Trump colluded with Russia?
To be fair, that’s pretty much P_rushing with every single claim he’s ever made on this board
“Just wait until the new drops tomorrow. I can’t show you now but you’ll see tomorrow.”
I don't claim anything. If something is rumors and/or nothing to back it up I will say that. If it's stuff from non-MSM that has multiple different sources and can be backed up, I'll post it but you won't click on the link so I'm not wasting time saving a link to post later.
(11-14-2024, 10:15 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]It takes the same number of votes to recess as it does to confirm an appointment. You keep getting distracted by whatever shiny object the fakers dangle in front of you on Twitter. Whether it's "spying on campaigns" in 2018 or "recess appointments" in 2024...
And by the way Thomas Massive isn't a senator.
Trump has the power to decide when to recess under specific scenarios.
(11-14-2024, 10:23 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]https://x.com/stillgray/status/185724345...ScpSA&s=19
(11-14-2024, 11:02 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ] (11-14-2024, 10:58 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]He's talking about a recess appointment being appropriate if Democrats try to abuse the filibuster power. He did not discuss what he would do if four Republicans defect and there is no Senate majority for confirmation.
You know he met with all 3 candidates and already got their word, correct?
Per Rick Scott
While he is saying this now, Turtle and all the other RINO leaders have said the same thing in the past. Then they all go and work behind the scenes to do the opposite. Someone with a F rating shouldn't be the majority leader.
Unless Trump has all the blackmail on him, this is not going to be a good outcome. The confirmations will be the first test but I see it going the same way as last time. He will claim this is how the Senate works, people have to be approved, go through the process, etc.
Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
(11-15-2024, 12:16 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-15-2024, 12:00 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Right and if you have 4 Republican senators who disagree about one of the appointments there will not be a simple majority to recess.
It is called crossing that bridge when you cross it. What is amazing, after the last 4 years the behavior of the Democratic party has done something I never would have thought possible. The Republicans are of one mind. I have never seen that.
It's just Trump and his voters. The Dems have nothing to do with it. The Republicans who tried to stand up to Trump lost re-election almost every time.
(11-15-2024, 08:07 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (11-15-2024, 12:16 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]It is called crossing that bridge when you cross it. What is amazing, after the last 4 years the behavior of the Democratic party has done something I never would have thought possible. The Republicans are of one mind. I have never seen that.
It's just Trump and his voters. The Dems have nothing to do with it. The Republicans who tried to stand up to Trump lost re-election almost every time.
The Democratic party has since he left office waged a war on DJT. They have harassed anyone that supports him and used the DOJ to attack him. The Lawfare I believe is what tipped the scales and galvanized the Republican party. No the Democrats had everything to do with it.
(11-15-2024, 09:27 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-15-2024, 08:07 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]It's just Trump and his voters. The Dems have nothing to do with it. The Republicans who tried to stand up to Trump lost re-election almost every time.
The Democratic party has since he left office waged a war on DJT. They have harassed anyone that supports him and used the DOJ to attack him. The Lawfare I believe is what tipped the scales and galvanized the Republican party. No the Democrats had everything to do with it.
Lol. You keep forgetting that this isn't actually professional wrestling. It just looks like professional wrestling. In reality these are adults, in both parties, who don't need big daddy government to stand up for them.
DJT wasn't harassed. He was indicted in four separate criminal cases and two civil cases. Three of the four criminal cases and one of the civil cases was totally legitimate.
Good people don't use charity funds to buy paintings to hang in their personal living space.
Good people don't send fake electoral votes to Congress.
Good people don't ask election officials to magically find more votes.
Good people don't store nuclear codes in a golf club bathroom.
He deserves most of what he got. Just because that truth is unpopular, only means that our popularly elected government can't act on it. The unpopularity of the truth doesn't make it untrue.
(11-15-2024, 09:54 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (11-15-2024, 09:27 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]The Democratic party has since he left office waged a war on DJT. They have harassed anyone that supports him and used the DOJ to attack him. The Lawfare I believe is what tipped the scales and galvanized the Republican party. No the Democrats had everything to do with it.
Lol. You keep forgetting that this isn't actually professional wrestling. It just looks like professional wrestling. In reality these are adults, in both parties, who don't need big daddy government to stand up for them.
DJT wasn't harassed. He was indicted in four separate criminal cases and two civil cases. Three of the four criminal cases and one of the civil cases was totally legitimate.
Good people don't use charity funds to buy paintings to hang in their personal living space.
Good people don't send fake electoral votes to Congress.
Good people don't store nuclear codes in a golf club bathroom.
He deserves most of what he got. Just because that truth is unpopular, only means that our popularly elected government can't act on it. The unpopularity of the truth doesn't make it untrue.
Respectfully what you wrote is your opinion. That does not make it true or factual. We can go down the list in detail but that is a waste of time for both of us. You wanted to know the straw that broke the camel's back and unified the party I told you. I believe after all is said and done more people have my opinion than yours. Peace out.
(11-15-2024, 10:01 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-15-2024, 09:54 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Lol. You keep forgetting that this isn't actually professional wrestling. It just looks like professional wrestling. In reality these are adults, in both parties, who don't need big daddy government to stand up for them.
DJT wasn't harassed. He was indicted in four separate criminal cases and two civil cases. Three of the four criminal cases and one of the civil cases was totally legitimate.
Good people don't use charity funds to buy paintings to hang in their personal living space.
Good people don't send fake electoral votes to Congress.
Good people don't store nuclear codes in a golf club bathroom.
He deserves most of what he got. Just because that truth is unpopular, only means that our popularly elected government can't act on it. The unpopularity of the truth doesn't make it untrue.
Respectfully what you wrote is your opinion. That does not make it true or factual. We can go down the list in detail but that is a waste of time for both of us. You wanted to know the straw that broke the camel's back and unified the party I told you. I believe after all is said and done more people have my opinion than yours. Peace out.
Respectfully what you wrote is your opinion. That does not make it true or factual. We can go down the list in detail but that is a waste of time for both of us. You wanted to know the straw that broke the camel's back and unified the party I told you. I believe after all is said and done my opinion is
based on facts, while yours is based on a desire to blame others for your own actions. Peace out.
Sounds like Fauci has some questions he'll need to answer..
![[Image: Sy1gn.jpg]](https://s11.gifyu.com/images/Sy1gn.jpg)
(11-15-2024, 12:02 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (11-15-2024, 10:01 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]Respectfully what you wrote is your opinion. That does not make it true or factual. We can go down the list in detail but that is a waste of time for both of us. You wanted to know the straw that broke the camel's back and unified the party I told you. I believe after all is said and done more people have my opinion than yours. Peace out.
Respectfully what you wrote is your opinion. That does not make it true or factual. We can go down the list in detail but that is a waste of time for both of us. You wanted to know the straw that broke the camel's back and unified the party I told you. I believe after all is said and done my opinion is based on facts, while yours is based on a desire to blame others for your own actions. Peace out.
Good people don't store nuclear codes in a golf club bathroom.
First how many good people do you know that have nuclear codes?
Where do you store your nuclear codes?
Where have past presidents stored nuclear codes?
Maybe he just followed Hillary's lead when she stored the illegal email server in her bathroom that was serviced by foreign nationals that fled the country.
Everyone knows you store nuclear codes in a hermetically sealed mason jar stored under Funk & Wagnalls porch.
As for the indictments yea you can indict people. All the cases face certain death after the Chevron case was decided by the supreme court since the prosecutor no longer gets to interpret the law. The one conviction of the misdemeanor charge in New York that convicted him of a felony is also dead upon appeal as the judge allowed evidence that is constitutionally illegal into the record.
We have already discussed these. Old news and a factor in the reason people voted for Trump. All I can say is thank you in the accent of Latka Gravas from Taxi. (the sitcom)
Facts?
(11-15-2024, 02:16 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-15-2024, 12:02 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Respectfully what you wrote is your opinion. That does not make it true or factual. We can go down the list in detail but that is a waste of time for both of us. You wanted to know the straw that broke the camel's back and unified the party I told you. I believe after all is said and done my opinion is based on facts, while yours is based on a desire to blame others for your own actions. Peace out.
Good people don't store nuclear codes in a golf club bathroom.
First how many good people do you know that have nuclear codes?
Where do you store your nuclear codes?
Where have past presidents stored nuclear codes?
Maybe he just followed Hillary's lead when she stored the illegal email server in her bathroom that was serviced by foreign nationals that fled the country.
Everyone knows you store nuclear codes in a hermetically sealed mason jar stored under Funk & Wagnalls porch.
As for the indictments yea you can indict people. All the cases face certain death after the Chevron case was decided by the supreme court since the prosecutor no longer gets to interpret the law. The one conviction of the misdemeanor charge in New York that convicted him of a felony is also dead upon appeal as the judge allowed evidence that is constitutionally illegal into the record.
We have already discussed these. Old news and a factor in the reason people voted for Trump. All I can say is thank you in the accent of Latka Gravas from Taxi. (the sitcom)
Facts?
Hillary should have been indicted and prevented from running for office.
A man who is no longer in office should no longer keep assembly or detonation instructions for nuclear weapons. And certainly not in a bathroom in a public building.
(11-15-2024, 02:23 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (11-15-2024, 02:16 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]Good people don't store nuclear codes in a golf club bathroom.
First how many good people do you know that have nuclear codes?
Where do you store your nuclear codes?
Where have past presidents stored nuclear codes?
Maybe he just followed Hillary's lead when she stored the illegal email server in her bathroom that was serviced by foreign nationals that fled the country.
Everyone knows you store nuclear codes in a hermetically sealed mason jar stored under Funk & Wagnalls porch.
As for the indictments yea you can indict people. All the cases face certain death after the Chevron case was decided by the supreme court since the prosecutor no longer gets to interpret the law. The one conviction of the misdemeanor charge in New York that convicted him of a felony is also dead upon appeal as the judge allowed evidence that is constitutionally illegal into the record.
We have already discussed these. Old news and a factor in the reason people voted for Trump. All I can say is thank you in the accent of Latka Gravas from Taxi. (the sitcom)
Facts?
Hillary should have been indicted and prevented from running for office.
A man who is no longer in office should no longer keep assembly or detonation instructions for nuclear weapons. And certainly not in a bathroom in a public building.
First you said CODES which I assumed launch codes. My bad. What you say now are assembly or denotation
instructions which are a way different thing. No need for them to be in a in a hermetically sealed mason jar stored under Funk & Wagnalls porch. Next is it assembly or is it detonation or both?
If they had indicted Hillary she would have won just like Trump did this time. Just a guess.