(12-02-2024, 09:02 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2024, 12:04 AM)The_Franchise_QB Wrote: [ -> ]I’ve learned over the last couple of weeks reading comprehension is a hard thing. Especially for someone like you. Maybe you just wouldn’t understand (too poor). I said ML, meaning moneyline. Means doesn’t matter the spread. I also said it’s a great parlay starter. You probably don’t know what any of that means(too poor).
Good God. Who the hell is supposed to know ML means moneyline?
And not knowing what that means doesn't mean someone's too poor. It means they're not an idiot.
Imagine your flex being that you speak bookie...lol.
(12-02-2024, 09:37 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2024, 09:02 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]Good God. Who the hell is supposed to know ML means moneyline?
And not knowing what that means doesn't mean someone's too poor. It means they're not an idiot.
Imagine your flex being that you speak bookie...lol.
Yeah, that's pretty funny.
(12-02-2024, 09:37 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2024, 09:02 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]Good God. Who the hell is supposed to know ML means moneyline?
And not knowing what that means doesn't mean someone's too poor. It means they're not an idiot.
Imagine your flex being that you speak bookie...lol.
No doubt. I thought TGM something about an OG NBA player for the BCs, but that probably GB2F tbh.
(12-02-2024, 09:02 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2024, 12:04 AM)The_Franchise_QB Wrote: [ -> ]I’ve learned over the last couple of weeks reading comprehension is a hard thing. Especially for someone like you. Maybe you just wouldn’t understand (too poor). I said ML, meaning moneyline. Means doesn’t matter the spread. I also said it’s a great parlay starter. You probably don’t know what any of that means(too poor).
Good God. Who the hell is supposed to know ML means moneyline?
And not knowing what that means doesn't mean someone's too poor. It means they're not an idiot.
I mean anyone that gambles knows what ML means in a gambling context.
(12-01-2024, 06:06 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ] (12-01-2024, 06:03 PM)snowwolf776 Wrote: [ -> ]another loss thanks to the clown Khan,as long as he owns the team Jacksonville will Never Never Never Never Never ever win a game again,nor even come close to being a winning franchisee. Khan needs to be fired,someone rich with football knowledge needs to but the jags from the clown,idiot loser!
We will go 25 straight years winless with the new stadium. Im going to come back to this post in 25 years to prove you were right.
The forum crashes on a weekly basis, and you expect this forum to still in exist in 25 years?
Can you still view and post your SixDegrees, AIM Messages, and AOL chat board posts?
(11-12-2024, 11:06 PM)Thewitnessofsolinvictus Wrote: [ -> ] (11-12-2024, 10:39 PM)snowwolf776 Wrote: [ -> ]lets fire Khan,and have a rich person with football knowledge buy the team. shad Khan is the real problem in Loserville. until he is gone we can forget ever being winners.
Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter
If you two have a few billions to help enact that change, I'll pony up some money to help out as a minority owner.
(12-29-2024, 03:54 PM)rpr52121 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-12-2024, 11:06 PM)Thewitnessofsolinvictus Wrote: [ -> ]Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter
If you two have a few billions to help enact that change, I'll pony up some money to help out as a minority owner.
We...uhhhh....outlawed that in 1865.
I dont follow English soccer. Is Khan s team as historically bad as the Jags under his ownership?
(12-29-2024, 04:54 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (12-29-2024, 03:54 PM)rpr52121 Wrote: [ -> ]If you two have a few billions to help enact that change, I'll pony up some money to help out as a minority owner.
We...uhhhh....outlawed that in 1865.
I didn't mean that.
(12-30-2024, 11:19 AM)NewJagsCity Wrote: [ -> ]I dont follow English soccer. Is Khan s team as historically bad as the Jags under his ownership?
Actually no. They were in pretty bad shape when he bought the team, had just been designated for relegation. It took time for him to get competent organizational structure and FO, but they are now solidly back in the EPL, and in the middle of the standings/table. Being the best contenders in the EPL is much more about who has the money to buy big names who or best multilayered infrastructure (like minor leagues) down to like kid ages, so it may hard for him to get Fulham beyond that consistently. Maybe 1 season here or there they break through to qualify for the bigger cups or challenge for EPL title, but on the whole they have performed much better than the Jags relative to their peers.
(12-30-2024, 11:19 AM)NewJagsCity Wrote: [ -> ]I dont follow English soccer. Is Khan s team as historically bad as the Jags under his ownership?
No.
I've been a Fulham fan since 2018. They are the reason I've known the Khans and have become a Jags fan.
They aren't perfect, and you should have heard what some of the Fulham fans have said about Tony Khan over the years...but the team has been promoted twice and appear to have solidified themselves in the highest league in euro football. It only took them finding the right manager/coach.
I'm praying they can turn it around in American football as well.
![[Image: sesame-street-what-did-i-just-read.gif]](https://media.tenor.com/Phy9dZWFmsEAAAAM/sesame-street-what-did-i-just-read.gif)