Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Doge begins
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
The money is being followed. Only a matter of time before some is found to leak back into the pockets of a political party.

Four plead guilty in massive bribery scheme at agency Democrats fought to protect from DOGE

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/four-pl...-from-doge
Trump May Have Secret Weapon To Ram DOGE Cuts Past Timid GOP Senators (R.I.N.O.'s)

he White House might leverage an obscure procedural tool to push through billions in spending cuts identified by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) without the help of Congress.

In June, the GOP-controlled House approved a $9.4 billion rescissions package to reduce wasteful spending, but Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins of Maine has signaled skepticism of the package. However, a little-known mechanism known as a “pocket rescission” could allow the administration to implement tens of billions in additional cuts outlined by DOGE, all without requiring explicit approval from Congress.

Under the Impoundment Control Act (ICA) of 1974, the president can request the rescission of funds that Congress previously appropriated, effectively freezing those funds while Congress is given 45 days to approve or reject the request. A pocket rescission is a rescission request made with less than 45 days left in the fiscal year, causing any unspent funds to automatically expire because most federal funds cannot carry over into the next fiscal year.

https://ijr.com/trump-may-have-secret-we...-senators/
(06-20-2025, 08:18 PM)The Drifter Wrote: [ -> ]Trump May Have Secret Weapon To Ram DOGE Cuts Past Timid GOP Senators  (R.I.N.O.'s)

he White House might leverage an obscure procedural tool to push through billions in spending cuts identified by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) without the help of Congress.

In June, the GOP-controlled House approved a $9.4 billion rescissions package to reduce wasteful spending, but Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins of Maine has signaled skepticism of the package. However, a little-known mechanism known as a “pocket rescission” could allow the administration to implement tens of billions in additional cuts outlined by DOGE, all without requiring explicit approval from Congress.

Under the Impoundment Control Act (ICA) of 1974, the president can request the rescission of funds that Congress previously appropriated, effectively freezing those funds while Congress is given 45 days to approve or reject the request. A pocket rescission is a rescission request made with less than 45 days left in the fiscal year, causing any unspent funds to automatically expire because most federal funds cannot carry over into the next fiscal year.

https://ijr.com/trump-may-have-secret-we...-senators/

So basically the same as a pocket veto
(06-20-2025, 08:18 PM)The Drifter Wrote: [ -> ]Trump May Have Secret Weapon To Ram DOGE Cuts Past Timid GOP Senators  (R.I.N.O.'s)

he White House might leverage an obscure procedural tool to push through billions in spending cuts identified by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) without the help of Congress.

In June, the GOP-controlled House approved a $9.4 billion rescissions package to reduce wasteful spending, but Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins of Maine has signaled skepticism of the package. However, a little-known mechanism known as a “pocket rescission” could allow the administration to implement tens of billions in additional cuts outlined by DOGE, all without requiring explicit approval from Congress.

Under the Impoundment Control Act (ICA) of 1974, the president can request the rescission of funds that Congress previously appropriated, effectively freezing those funds while Congress is given 45 days to approve or reject the request. A pocket rescission is a rescission request made with less than 45 days left in the fiscal year, causing any unspent funds to automatically expire because most federal funds cannot carry over into the next fiscal year.

https://ijr.com/trump-may-have-secret-we...-senators/
 
He can ram it through all he wants but if he just going to replace Dem spending with Trump spending then we all lose.  Elon is right on this.
(06-21-2025, 04:55 PM)copycat Wrote: [ -> ]
(06-20-2025, 08:18 PM)The Drifter Wrote: [ -> ]Trump May Have Secret Weapon To Ram DOGE Cuts Past Timid GOP Senators  (R.I.N.O.'s)

he White House might leverage an obscure procedural tool to push through billions in spending cuts identified by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) without the help of Congress.

In June, the GOP-controlled House approved a $9.4 billion rescissions package to reduce wasteful spending, but Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins of Maine has signaled skepticism of the package. However, a little-known mechanism known as a “pocket rescission” could allow the administration to implement tens of billions in additional cuts outlined by DOGE, all without requiring explicit approval from Congress.

Under the Impoundment Control Act (ICA) of 1974, the president can request the rescission of funds that Congress previously appropriated, effectively freezing those funds while Congress is given 45 days to approve or reject the request. A pocket rescission is a rescission request made with less than 45 days left in the fiscal year, causing any unspent funds to automatically expire because most federal funds cannot carry over into the next fiscal year.

https://ijr.com/trump-may-have-secret-we...-senators/
 
He can ram it through all he wants but if he just going to replace Dem spending with Trump spending then we all lose.  Elon is right on this.

Agree this.  If he was to use this method to enact the DOGE cuts it would be a political gambit. He doesn't have to run for re election, while many Senate and House members do.  If he uses this tactic there is no worry about negative election ads for voting for it. Some of these items have local impact on those constituents.
[Image: 502909262-24678749155047822-8555443087669114953-n.jpg]
Poor old Andrea Mitchell. Bless her biased faux journalist heart. 

https://youtu.be/bjURdh5RGzE?si=-1lz0vOTgSPr3hTR
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21